User talk:DrKay

"Logan" at Tuileries Palace

• Logan da dude (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Logan815 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Tuileries Palace (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I noticed you blocked an editor named Logan da dude a few months ago for block evasion. The editor was active at Tuileries Palace, which you also semi-protected for a few months due to persistent sockpuppetry.

Within a day of the semi-protection expiring, an editor named Logan815 began editing the article, making the same type of edits that Logan da dude made. Given the editing behavior and the similar usernames, I'm thinking they are probably the same person. Would you mind taking a look? (I figured I'd ask you instead of taking this to SPI since I'm not sure who the master is. However, I am open to filing an SPI case if you prefer that I go that route.) Aoi (青い) (talk) 00:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Increase in protection level

Hi DrKay. I don't know if it's possible to make an appeal directly to an administrator or not, but I think Oprah with Meghan and Harry needs to be protected immediately. It had been under protection for a year and now the occasional silliness has started to show up, with people removing stuff and making amendments as they please. This is a very sensitive topic, and rather recent, so I would urge you to do something about it, maybe by enforcing some sort of protection. Cheers. Keivan.f^Talk 19:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

As I am not doing intentionally, I have done legitimate changes that will not make problem. Because I want to contribute towards Wikepedia to make articles better and reliable. Atharva Jawalkar (talk) 03:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Section titles

Hi DrKay, I saw your edit summary regarding splitting up the over long section for Victoria and Elizabeth I. I wanted to let you know that Elizabeth II has one section dedicated to her reign despite reigning longer than any monarch before her. I would like to know if you would recommend taking out unimportant pieces of information so that the entire section regarding their reigns are not overly lengthy. Could you elaborate on whether you would support splitting up the Elizabeth II section or merging Victoria’s for Elizabeth I’s. Interstellarity (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

I don't think large sections serve the interest of readers, as they are difficult to parse and if a section, as Elizabeth I's Reign section did, has 18 sub-sections then in my opinion the article has organisational problems that do not meet FAC criterion 2b. DrKay (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi again, could you clarify if you would support splitting the section on Elizabeth II reign into sections like other monarchs? Thanks, Interstellarity (talk) 20:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

I might do, but it's difficult to comment without knowing what the new sectioning would be. DrKay (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear DrKay,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Elizabeth II cause of death

Thank you for your thoughtful comments and closure of this section. I commend you for not shutting it down sooner because that is sometimes done as a hostile act to censor discussion. Instead, it was allowed to progress for a reasonable period.

I also commend you for not saying "the cause of death was old age" but mentioning that it is listed on the death certificate. If you are really a doctor, you know that "old age" is a lay term and not a good clinical cause of death. Fine that Scotland is old fashioned and allows it on the death certificate.

On a different subject, I strongly suspect that she was a DNR Do Not Resuscitate Do Not Treat. She was not even taken to a hospital for diagnosis of a stroke or whatever she had. Even if people speculate that she died of a broken heart, that is not clinical. What is clinical is some people, faced with grief, do experience arrthymias which can lead to death.

Are you a doctor?

CandyStalnak (talk) 19:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

I am a psychiatrist, but I don't advertise the fact. I suspect that she didn't wake up in the morning and when they went in to check, she was already on the way out. It's usually easy to tell in these cases. The breathing of a dying person is very distinctive and once it starts, it's inevitable. DrKay (talk) 19:15, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Old Dan Tucker under Featured Article Review

I have nominated Old Dan Tucker for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. George Ho (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Mary, Queen of Scots#Mary I

Your attention is drawn to a straw poll, which has been inserted on the article’s talk page, with regard to the inclusion in the infobox header of an ordinal number. Regards 2A00:23C6:B808:7701:508B:990E:B913:F285 (talk) 19:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Princess Elena of Romania

Hello, I came spontaneously insert the title of Crown Princess, since her sister Margareta is childless.--MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma (write) 06:52, Tuesday 11 October 2022 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research for guidance. DrKay (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

ANI Notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—Ganesha811 (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

FAR notice

I have nominated Elizabeth II for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. John (talk) 15:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Title of the Albanian Royal Family.

Firstly, Crown Prince Leka is written with a roman II, as Leka II. Please use as reference the signature example currently on the page.

Secondly, what references do you require from me to convince you “as one single individual who uses his privileges as an editor without providing argument nor proof to undo my revisions to the page”? This is a honest question so to improve the overall quality of the Wikipedia article.

The title “of the Albanians” is the only title of the Albanian Royal Family. It is installed in the Albanian constitution. In removing this title you are showing political bais which goes against the rules of Wikipedia.

Thirdly, the title Crown Prince is fully legitimate, for two primary reasons. Leka’s father was a King as decided by an National Assembly in exile. Recognized title by the Albanian state, which held a day of mourning after his passing and a state funeral. These facts are easily verified online. And: The Head of the Albanian Royal House maintains the title “Crown Prince” unless he or she is ratified by a governing body, as was done for King Leka. I can send you a copy in English of the constitution for your review but Wikipedia doesn’t allow websites.. so please research this point and take into consideration my expertise in the protocols of the Albanian Royal Family. Albpasion (talk) 21:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

There's nothing in the Constitution about any of the above. Per Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Article titles, wikipedia refers to pretenders by their common names in reliable secondary sources, not by what they call themselves on their own websites. DrKay (talk) 07:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

The Albanian constitution of 1928 is the regulatory format of the Royal House:

Chapter II - The Executive Power

Section A - The King

Art. 50. The King of the Albanians is His Majesty Zog I, of the illustrious Albanian family of Zogu.

 Albpasion (talk) 21:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Art. 56. The King, in the. presence of Parliament, shall take the following oath : "I, - , King of the Albanians, on ascending the Throne of the Albanian Kingdom and assuming the Royal powers, swear in the presence of God Almighty that I will maintain national unity, the independence of the State, and its territorial integrity, and I will maintain and conform to the statute and laws in force, having the good of the, people always in mind. So help me God!" Albpasion (talk) 21:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Hear me out

Hi DrKay! 👋 just a request. I have a freind named Den on Wikipedia. Someone uploaded a fake image in an article. In articles of TV shows and cartoons, fake images are added. Please check Ododoapfkk (talk) 10:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)