User talk:Robert McClenon

Other archives
Problem Archive
Famekeeper Archive
FuelWagon Archive
Jack User Archive
John Carter Archive Why was my notcieboard post closed? I desperately need your mediation help?
PhiladelphiaInjustice Archive
78 Archive
DIRECTIVEA113 Archive

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Death of Michelle Go on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tytus Woyciechowski on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Stephen Harper on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States courts and judges on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Greased piglet on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Caste system in India on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Violet B. Haas on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Please respond to my third opinion request

I made another third opinion request and even ping Hunan201p. I want someone to tell me what's wrong because I don't even know it myself and Hunan201p doesn't tell me either.Ghizz Archus (talk) 17:38, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Ghizz Archus - I do not see another Third Opinion request. I cannot respond to a request that is not there. If you are planning to make a third opinion request in the near future, please do not ask me to review it before you post it. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 Italian regional elections on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Still no news in the dispute between me and the other user continues to impose himself

Hello. I listened to your advice you gave me here on my first attempt at the "dispute resulution", I opened the same discussion that I had already opened to the related projects, but without obtaining participation, in the talk of the skier Federica Brignone from which the dispute was born. And nothing... only he replied to me, giving me reason that the statistic of podiums in World Cup races is an important data, but that should be put as a table in the body of the article and not in the infobox. Which, as you can see, I did for Federica Brignone, but it is very difficult to do it in all the skiers' pages, when instead it would be enough to put it in the infobox as it is in other Wikipedias. In my opinion the "excuse" that the "medaltemplates" as it is called "medaltemplates" cannot be used to count the podiums because the medal is not awarded in the World Cup, it is childish and laughable and the guy repeated it to me for the umpteenth time. At this point for me the only one is to return to "dispute resolution" to avoid (for now) the ANI what do you say? --Kasper2006 (talk) 04:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Kasper2006 - You have only made one post to the article talk page, and that post isn't clear. It is not clear to me what you are asking for. Neither I nor any other volunteer will be able to help you if we don't know what you want. You say that the other user continues to impose himself, but I don't know what the problem is. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:13, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

I would like that if I put the podium table in the infobox that guy doesn't make me revert. I don't want an edit war and I don't want to bring it to ANI, you deleted the post to the dispute resolution. You tell me what to do? --Kasper2006 (talk) 08:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Kasper2006 - Try discussing it further at the article talk page. Ask for advice at the Teahouse. I don't have any other advice, except to agree that you should avoid WP:ANI. Try asking for advice at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:56, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Theahouse already done. I believe that when I decide the only one is the ANI. --Kasper2006 (talk) 06:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

"Principality of Ongal" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Principality of Ongal and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 25#Princedom of Ongal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:19, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Editing news 2022 #2

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

The [subscribe] button shortens response times.

The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

New Page Review

Hello,

I've added more 3rd party sources to Draft:Kleiner Device Labs. What else would improve this article? Stupac88 (talk) 06:26, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

TVAM 3rd Opinion

Thank you for taking the time to look at the talk page and highlight this option is not possible, I will try a different course of action. For your information, I was able to work out which parts of the main paragraph the other users ( thought it was only one) were not happy about and I was able to included it in the main page but else where with a ref. However that wasn't the bit which caused the issues I wished to raise. It was the following two statements.

• "After only two editions on air, Ford was struck with flu and Michael Parkinson stepped in to cover for her. The ratings slide was halted for the first time since the launch and even edged slightly up in the second week of the new team. As Parkinson was hosting the weekend show, sports reporter Nick Owen stepped in for Parkinson on Fridays and Mondays.
• Peter Jay asked her to step aside as the combination of Parkinson, Rippon and Owen was worth continuing to help the ratings. Ford refused, stating that if she stepped down, it would be too easy for the media to pin the disastrous start to the station on her. Rippon's behaviour and Ford's refusal to step aside caused great anger with the TV-am board and director Jonathan Aitken believed Jay incompetent for not removing them both.

However the other users are not forthcoming with discussion about the above two points which contradictory to other points on the page and would rather just make up strange statements. I might try Dispute resolution noticeboard, which might be the best course of action. Crazyseiko (talk) 13:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Crazyseiko - If you want me to comment on an article content dispute, it would be helpful to provide a link for me to where any previous discussion was, and even more helpful to tell me what article the dispute was about. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Crazyseiko - I see that the article content dispute is about TV-am. I also see that you have been told by two editors that you are adding material that is in need of copy-editing for grammar. It appears that they are removing it because it is hard to follow, and that you are putting it back with a long angry edit summary. That isn't helpful. Please do not post material that is in need of copy-editing for grammar. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

talk Thank you for your two comments, here and on my talk page. However Ive only seen one editor SovalValtos highlight the grammar point, so I'm not sure where the second one come in on TVAM. To answer your original point, there was one paragraph on the page which was questionable, I took it out and put it on the talk so people could look at it and improve it, nothing was forthcoming. One editor dislike this fact without explaining why, and after doing some digging I was able to restore that sentence elsewhere in the page. That just left the rest of the paragraph, so I removed the incorrect details and added in alot of new ref and plus additional new details to prove it was incorrect. I also added more ref and details to another part to make it correct. I don't believe there is any issues now with the main page. ( expect grammar points) --Crazyseiko (talk) 17:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

talk That isn't the reason this all started, but somehow ended up here over, copy-editing for grammar issues. The paragraph on the page which was questionable is not gone and replaced. I just need to deal with copy-editing now --Crazyseiko (talk) 20:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

RfC on Draft:OnionShare

If you want a 3RR:

• https://www.wired.com/2014/06/the-troubling-truth-of-why-its-still-so-hard-to-share-files-directly/
• https://www.wired.com/2014/05/onionshare/
• https://fossbytes.com/share-files-anonymouslytors-darknet-onionshare/

Onionshare is the only application that has a focus on File Sharing over for network. Along with book and article sources, you may also see these results for notability: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=OnionShare Greatder (talk) 07:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Greatder - I declined the draft because it does not speak for itself and explain to a reader why OnionShare is notable. It isn't helpful to send me links for background reading on the application. A reviewer shouldn't accept an article based on information that isn't in the article. The article should contain all of the information that the reader will need to know what is notable about OnionShare. Please expand the article to include any information that will tell the reader why OnionShare is notable. If you want another editor to look at the draft, you may ask for advice at the Teahouse, and they are likely to advise you to expand the draft to contain any information that you think is important. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sinn Féin on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Nataša Pirc Musar

Thank you for your helpful comment. I removed the mention of her candidacy from the lead paragraph and added information about numerous notable cases and books. This person is notable for her work and political posts over the last two decades, not for the candidacy. Could you please review and reconsider. Topjur01 (talk) 14:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Topjur01 - If I give the draft a detailed review, I will probably decline it. I am not reviewing it at this time, only commenting. I am advising that you ask for advice at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

If she is a candidate for President of Slovenia, then that fact should be in the lede of the article if there is an article. Just taking that fact out of the lede doesn't make her stop being a candidate for President. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your time and response. I will follow the path you mentioned when you wrote "The originator has the right to contest the draftification by moving this draft back into article space. If so, it will almost certainly be nominated for deletion, and the community will decide whether to keep it If the community." If the community will decide to delete it, then let it be. Topjur01 (talk) 17:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Update: Phase II of DS reform now open for comment

You were either a participant in WP:DS2021 (the Arbitration Committee's Discretionary Sanctions reform process) or requested to be notified about future developments regarding DS reform. The Committee now presents Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions/2021-22_review/Phase_II_consultation, and invites your feedback. Your patience has been appreciated. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you!

SmartScience (talk) 06:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Where did "movement" come from?

Hey Robert. I saw your comment asking where the idea of a "Wikimedia movement" came from and I was curious myself. I came along after the term was already in widespread use so never thought about it. It looks like it was coined by Anthere (Florence) back in 2009. Not here to argue about agreeing if it should exist as a term or not, just wanted to provide some context. :) Ckoerner (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	For the patience and guidance with the exceptionally long case of Manipulation (psychology), well done! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Iazyges - What was unusual about that long-running case was that the users were neutral to each other rather than hostile or passive-aggressive. The last long dispute before this one was the Italian political parties. You may recall that I had to fail it, and then the two principals wound up being topic-banned. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Stoke City F.C. on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:American Cochlear Implant Alliance

Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "American Cochlear Implant Alliance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Liz - Hmmm. First, I think that I have already asked whether the person who originally put this in their sandbox could be notified. But second, I see that this title has already been deleted as G13 three times. Is there some way that we can determine who is repeatedly creating this draft in a sandbox and then not doing anything with it? Maybe they should be given some sort of a trout for useless contributions? Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Liz - I've asked at the Idea Lab, and it may become another abandoned topic there. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Duplicate drafts

Hi Robert. Do you know the best way to deal with Draft:Shaheda Yesmin and Draft:Shaheda yesmin? Same person created them both and my guess is that they did so because they either didn't know how or wweren't able to MOVE the page to fix the lowercase used in the last name. They seem identical, but one has been submitted to AfC and declined. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

When there are two drafts, as when there are two entries in article space, the less complete one can be redirected to the more complete one if the more complete one has the correct title. The more complete one is the one with the AFC history, but it had the capitalization error. So I have round-robin-swapped them, and Draft:Shaheda Yesmin is now a declined draft where the originator can improve it. Draft:Shaheda yesmin is a redirect. If the article is accepted, I think that a bot will fix the double redirect. I don't know what happens to the redirect if the draft dies of old age, but it will be the end of winter in the northern hemisphere then. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Robert for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Marchjuly - It doesn't matter. The originator was a sockpuppet of the subject of the article, and both versions have been deleted as G5. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Draft comment

Can you please provide some instructions/suggestions on how to improve my Draft:List of Indian Soups and Stews and reasons on why it might be rejected! Lord kai07 (talk) 04:51, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Lord kai07 - At this point, the draft is not at risk of being rejected. It appears that it was sent back from article space to draft space because it did not have references. You may ask the reviewer, User:DaxServer, whether there was another reason why it was sent back, and it is always a good idea to ask the reviewer who sends an article to draft space why they sent it back. At this point it has the needed references. (Do not add more references.) Robert McClenon (talk) 06:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Dax server moved it yesterday before I started editing it. But now the editing is complete. So I don't really understand the reason for its rejection. Lord kai07 (talk) 07:26, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Lord kai07 - It hasn't been rejected. It is waiting for a another review. As the notice says, this may take anywhere from a few days to a few months. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:22, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm requesting you to review my page. Is it possible to ask reviwers like this, to make the process faster? Lord kai07 (talk) 04:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Lord kai07 - I don't normally review drafts on request. Some reviewers will review drafts on request, but most normally will not. However, I have looked at your draft in enough detail so that I am willing to accept it. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Lord kai07 (talk) 13:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Arceus

Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arceus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Well, well, User:Liz - This is one of the strangest histories I have seen on a G13 that is said to be mine. It appears that I had nothing to do with the version of the draft that died of old age. However, there was an earlier draft, and I accepted it in 2019 into article space. But then it was nominated for deletion, and was cut down to a redirect, and the redirect is still there. So the draft would have been to replace the redirect, which a reviewer would not have accepted without some reason to think that it would survive a second AFD. Well, well. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:55, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pierre Poilievre on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Erotic hypnosis on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Question about partial revert at NPOVN

I'm confused about this partial revert at NPOVN, since my understanding of WP:BLOCKEVASION is that blocked users should not be permitted to raise issues at noticeboards. Restoring the original header allows the LTA to continue to draw attention to their preferred target, and thus to continue to influence an ongoing discussion despite being blocked. You also state in your edit summary that restoring the header allows one to guess who the sockmaster was –– but I have prominently identified the sockmaster as Mikemikev in my hat summary.

Obviously this is not a huge deal, and I do not expect it to influence the current discussion one way or another. But I trust your judgement and so would like to know if my understanding of the norm surrounding block evasion is wrong in this case, or if perhaps you may have made an understandable mistake. Thanks, Generalrelative (talk) 21:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Generalrelative - First, I was trying to compromise between your collapse and rename of the thread and another editor's reverting of your actions. Second, I didn't research the policies before doing it, and so may have made a mistake. If so, however, I think that the policy as interpreted or as applied may be a little too rigid. I actually prefer what is done at WP:AN and WP:ANI, which is that posts by an editor who is then blocked for any reason, including being a sock of an already banned user, are boxed, that is, closed but left readable. So that is my reason, which is that I think that hatting a post by a sockpuppet is a little extreme, and boxing a post by a sockpuppet is sufficient. So in further thinking about it, I may have violated policy, in which case I was wrong, but I would prefer at least to leave the title in view. That is, let people see who the racist sockmaster was, and that discussion is not permitted. That's my convoluted answer. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Understood, thanks for the reply! Generalrelative (talk) 03:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

About your comment on the [Draft:Philosophical pessimism]

Hey, I saw your comment on Draft:Philosophical pessimism. I'm very much surprised by it. Haven't you seen the message that is at the top of the draft? It even includes the link to the discussion about moving the relevant information, discussion that is taking place on the original article's Talk page. I'm not sure what's the purpose of your comment there, given the above mentioned facts.

The information looks like this:

It has been suggested that parts of Pessimism (Philosophical pessimism) be moved into this page. (Discuss) Proposed since September 2022. Fantastiera (talk) 15:38, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Fantastiera - Yes. I know. I know. I was restating what it had been previously written. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

I see. Thank you for taking the time to look at my new article submission :) Fantastiera (talk) 06:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Operation London Bridge on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Responding to Your Comment On Newfold Digital Article Draft

@Robert McClenon Hello there! You left a comment on the draft of a Newfold Digital article I have been working on. Is this the best place to respond? Please let me know if I should respond in a different venue.

To answer your question, the intention behind creating the Newfold Digital article was to create a new article about the entity formed from the combination of Endurance International Group (EIG) and Web.com Group (in addition to other companies acquired by Newfold Digital since the merger). The previous Newfold Digital article was really just an EIG article with the Newfold Digital name pasted onto it, whereas Newfold Digital was actually made from two large holding companies combined into one by private equity; the other holding company's article (Web.com) retained its original name and content.

I asked for advice on the Teahouse, and came to the conclusion that the most elegant solution would be to revert the Newfold Digital article to the original EIG article, and create a fresh Newfold Digital article to better represent the company and provide clear, accurate information for interested readers (the notable brands listed in the new article that are owned by Newfold Digital also have their own articles).

I am an inexperienced editor and also have a conflict of interest (as disclosed on my user page), so I sought assistance on the Teahouse and received help from an interested editor, who helped me shape the article, build out the references, and provided a lot of advice and direction in general. The editor I worked with also reverted the Newfold Digital article to EIG in anticipation of my submission.

In terms of notability, I think given the size of the company, the number of customers it serves through its many brands, the public interest in its products and services, the fact that its notable brands already have their own articles, and the fact that both of the holding companies it now contains have their own articles, the parent company is notable. I think the best experience for a reader would be if they were able to search for a notable brand and then find the parent company (Newfold Digital) or search for the parent company and see what notable brands it owns, and read an accurate background of the company; I think the previous Newfold Digital article did not achieve this because of its inherent flaw of being an old article with a new name, and only representative of one side of the merger.

This is further complicated by the fact that Web.com was and is a public facing brand, in addition to being the previous parent company (Web.com Group) of several brands now under the Newfold Digital umbrella. (It is probably notable merely as a brand.) In the case of EIG, I imagine its greatest interest now is historical in nature; do you think replacing it entirely would make sense, or is it better to leave it in place to cover the history of the holding company that was?

As I mentioned, I am very new to all of this and I am open to all advice, guidance, and suggestions. Any help or direction you would be willing to provide would be much appreciated! Zach at Newfold (talk) 01:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Queen of the north

Hi, Robert! I've declined (for now) your speedy nomination at Queen of the north because it seems to me that the draft should not be moved there but to Queen of the North, as used in every entry in the page. Am I wrong (if so, I'll revert)? But if not, I'll delete that redirect instead to make way for the draft. The other will then presumably redirect there? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Talkspin

Template:Talkspin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Peter Cameron

Hello, would a renowned, reliable and independent source not in English (eg the Treccani Encyclopedia of Science, Letters, and Arts) be acceptable? Thanks Lucretius (talk) 08:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Lucretius - Sources are not required to be in English. I will ask the usual annoying question, which is whether you have a conflict of interest. An encyclopedia is a tertiary source, and we would prefer the use of secondary sources, but a tertiary source is much better than the non-independent sources. You may ask questions about reliable sources at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello Robert, no I do not have a conflict of interest. I don't have relations of whatever kind with Treccani nor I personally know Cameron (I just red his novels..) Lucretius (talk) 17:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello Robert, I left a comment in Draft talk:Peter Cameron (novelist). I'd appreciate if you could have a look (I tried to improve the sourcing, and although I included secondary sources the draft was rejected again). Thanks -- Lucretius (talk) 17:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Lucretius - Your draft was not rejected. It was declined. This means that you can resubmit it after addressing the concerns of the declining reviewer. If you disagree with the declining reviewer, I suggest that you ask other experienced editors to advise you and comment at the Teahouse, and in particular ask about their opinions about the sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! I posted a comment at the Teahouse and there's an ongoing discussion on the matter. -- Lucretius (talk) 08:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	For your work at dispute resolution. Andre🚐 23:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Andrevan - Thank you. The latest two disputes, about people in different parts of Eurasia, are frustrating because I don't seem to be able to get the editors to state what they disagree about. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

When I used to work mediations and I had situations like that, in the toughest content disputes, I would go one sentence and even one word at a time until we could figure out where the problem would lie. Andre🚐 00:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Andrewvan - Yes. I know. Or I think I know. And what did you do when they replied to your question about the word by saying, "The article is not NPOV"? Robert McClenon (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Eventually I usually would throw in the towel and let another mediator take a crack at it, or refer to ARBCOM. Not a very satisfying answer, I know. Several disruptive users from the mediations I worked later were indeffed, too, so there's that. Best of luck! Andre🚐 00:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Discussion at WP:THQ § Article help

 You are invited to join the discussion at WP:THQ § Article help. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Robert. Since you seem to have been the last person to review Draft:Jeff Ruby perhaps you might want to try and answer this TH question about it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Marchjuly - Thanks for the note. Replied. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Prince (2022 film)

The Draft:Prince (2022 film) is about a Tamil and Telugu movie which has enough resources for being a Page. This movie is a main stream Tamil movie dubbed into Telugu language. The movie trailers and songs have millions of views.

Tamil movie trailer : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHUZsWSwxWM

Telugu movie trailer:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6073B0sT5a0

Please review the draft again to change it to page. ~~ Rasulnrasul (talk) 12:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Rasulnrasul - The film has not yet been released, and does not satisfy film notability guidelines. If you think that the unreleased film is notable, you may ask for the advice of other experienced editors at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

DRV comment

I think your recent DRV comment has introduced some formatting errors. I'm not sure what you intended to put there otherwise I'd have fixed it myself. Stifle (talk) 10:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Stifle - Thank you. An IP fixed the error about six hours after I made the error. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lion on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Pëllumb Xhufi

At that RSN that you are moderating, user SilentResident is refering to Xhufi's views as "extremist". Pëllumb Xhufi is a living person, and WP:BLP applies. I do not think that editors should use such language when talking about a famous living person. Indeed, Xhufi is biased in several cases, but still his works have been published by or cited in works of Toulouse University, Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press etc. Xhufi is not an "extremist" at all. I think that as the moderator of the discussion, you should ask the editors to be more careful with the words they choose. Cheers, Ktrimi991 (talk) 21:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Scholarship widely refers to Xhufi as 'nationalist' (see my statments in DRN). The issue creates an ever growing controversy and yet another article has been targeted by Xhufi's extreme narrative [[1]]. We need to deal with this kind of POV. Thid partisan nature of the specific polician-historian was also witnessed by Ktrimi [[2]].Alexikoua (talk) 23:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Hey, Robert. Hope you're well. Thank you for informing me about the discussion concerning Xhufi[3]. I'm very busy IRL and can't be a participant in the discussion, hence I posted information from Xhufi's official bio in the International Union of Academies as he's currently the representative of the national academy of Albania in the institution [4]. It's concerning that some editors are using wikipedia to discuss living academics in very problematic manner under the guise of anonymity. They are aware that the rhetoric which they're employing may fall under the scope of WP:BLP as their comments about Xhufi have been redacted by other admins[5].--Maleschreiber (talk) 01:31, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Redirect massacre!

Hello, Robert,

I'm not sure how this happened, but when you moved Draft:Samsung Galaxy S to Draft space, it resulted in 67 broken redirects! (See https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:AnomieBOT_III/Broken_redirects&oldid=1116494182 here). I created a temporary redirect and redirect talk page so these pages wouldn't all be deleted and I'm not sure if it is pointed at the right target. The main space article for Samsung Galaxy S was moved to another page title, Samsung Galaxy S (2010 smartphone) before you moved it to Draft space so I just used that title as the new redirect target. Maybe it should be moved back to Samsung Galaxy S? Typically after a page move, Wikipedia's bots fix all existing redirects to point to the new target but I guess they got confused with these back-to-back article moves. It's not unusual for an article moved from main space to Draft space to result in a few broken redirects but I've never seen anything like this happen. Let me know if you figure it all out! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Liz - Weird! I'm looking at it. In retrospect, maybe I should have reverted rather than draftified. But that makes me think that restoring the redirect at Samsung Galaxy S might be in order. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Liz - I see that you sort of have the situation under control. I will look at it in more detail within 24 hours. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Liz - I see what my mistake was. I should have checked the history of the page. It looked to me, from the New Page Feed, like a new article, but it wasn't. It had a long history. So my action in draftifying was a mistake, and you cleaned it up in what seems to be the right way. Now that the page is defined as a disambiguation page, it doesn't need the references that it doesn't have.

The lesson is not to draftify a page that has a long history, even if appears in the New Page Feed. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello Robert McClenon,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

• There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
• Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
• Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
• This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
• If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen

I'm sorry but I am having a hard time understanding why Max Verstappen is the only driver on the top 10 list for Grand Prix wins to not have his own page for wins. Divers with fewer wins have their own page. But why not him? TheEarth1974 (talk) 20:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Clenixon/2000 Cyprus International Tournament

Hello, Robert McClenon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2000 Cyprus International Tournament".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Liz - Well, well. This is strange. It appears that I moved the page from user space to draft space, but it has now been deleted from user space. Well, well. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Maisie Lockwood

Hello there, Robert, and thanks for reviewing Anne or Beast?, can you please also review Draft:Maisie Lockwood? Bmona12 (talk) 11:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Phone Bhoot

The article Draft:Phone Bhoot is ready please review it. Remember you had rejected it on 21 July 2020. MNWiki845 (talk) 11:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

@MNWiki845 (talk page stalker) I very much doubt anyone will review on request. Just submit it and a reviewer will drop by when they can 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Timtrent - I often do look at drafts when it is obvious that the requester is being tendentious. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

We all do 😇. But their expectation 👀 needs to be set correctly as well 👍 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Liberland on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

GCL

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GCL. Thanks! Itay. The page "Draft:GCL" (links | edit) has been moved to "Draft:Global coordination measure". In the wikipedia GCL disambiguation page I have added the Global coordination measure value. Levyitau (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)