Talk:The Encyclopœdia of Sexual Knowledge: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
rating |
Wolfgang8741 (talk | contribs) Assessment: banner shell, Sexology and sexuality, Books (Rater) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|class=Stub|importance=Low}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Books|class=Stub|listas=Encyclopœdia Of Sexual Knowledge|needs-infobox=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Reference works|class=stub|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Reference works|class=stub|importance=low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
Revision as of 11:54, 26 October 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Encyclopœdia of Sexual Knowledge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
lemma
Is it really Encyclopœdia, not Encyclopædia? If so, there should be a remark that the original title is misspelled.--88.73.35.217 (talk) 09:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- Stub-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Stub-Class Book articles
- Book articles without infoboxes
- WikiProject Books articles
- Unassessed Book articles
- Reference works task force articles