Jump to content

User talk:Z1933: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Z1933 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Z1933 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 8: Line 8:


Multiple users on one IP address is not. [[User:Z1933|Z1933]] ([[User talk:Z1933#top|talk]]) 01:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Multiple users on one IP address is not. [[User:Z1933|Z1933]] ([[User talk:Z1933#top|talk]]) 01:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

{{unblock| This is a real account, and I’ve been nothing but respectful on the talk page. I’m being targeted for political reasons. Please unblock me. Thank you.}} [[User:Z1933|Z1933]] ([[User talk:Z1933#top|talk]]) 02:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:00, 3 November 2022

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Richinstead per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Richinstead. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 09:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not true Z1933 (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We’re a multiple Wikipedia editor address. Please stop cyberbullying us. Z1933 (talk) 13:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple users on an account is against the rules. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots16:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple users on one IP address is not. Z1933 (talk) 01:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Z1933 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is a real account, and I’ve been nothing but respectful on the talk page. I’m being targeted for political reasons. Please unblock me. Thank you.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= This is a real account, and I’ve been nothing but respectful on the talk page. I’m being targeted for political reasons. Please unblock me. Thank you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= This is a real account, and I’ve been nothing but respectful on the talk page. I’m being targeted for political reasons. Please unblock me. Thank you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= This is a real account, and I’ve been nothing but respectful on the talk page. I’m being targeted for political reasons. Please unblock me. Thank you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Z1933 (talk) 02:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]