Talk:Monandrous: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Old AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monandrous closed as merge (XFDcloser) |
Monandrous applies to humans too. |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This article is unuseful. It should redirect to stamen or orchidaceae. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Aelwyn|Aelwyn]] ([[User talk:Aelwyn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aelwyn|contribs]]) 08:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This article is unuseful. It should redirect to stamen or orchidaceae. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Aelwyn|Aelwyn]] ([[User talk:Aelwyn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aelwyn|contribs]]) 08:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:It also contradicts [[Orchidaceae]] about whether the primitive orchid had one or three stamens. I'd probably say we should redirect to wiktionary (or transwiki, or whatever the procedure is - I'm not saying the text currently at Monandrous is worth keeping). Trying to turn [[Orchidaceae]] or [[Stamen]] into a long list of term definitions is not likely to be good for those articles. [[User:Kingdon|Kingdon]] 13:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
:It also contradicts [[Orchidaceae]] about whether the primitive orchid had one or three stamens. I'd probably say we should redirect to wiktionary (or transwiki, or whatever the procedure is - I'm not saying the text currently at Monandrous is worth keeping). Trying to turn [[Orchidaceae]] or [[Stamen]] into a long list of term definitions is not likely to be good for those articles. [[User:Kingdon|Kingdon]] 13:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
What about in humans? Among my gay friends, monandrous is a preferred substitute term for monogamous. [[User:Ydhirsch|Ydhirsch]] ([[User talk:Ydhirsch|talk]]) 03:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:31, 10 November 2022
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 March 2022. The result of the discussion was merge. |
Plants Redirect‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This article is unuseful. It should redirect to stamen or orchidaceae. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelwyn (talk • contribs) 08:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- It also contradicts Orchidaceae about whether the primitive orchid had one or three stamens. I'd probably say we should redirect to wiktionary (or transwiki, or whatever the procedure is - I'm not saying the text currently at Monandrous is worth keeping). Trying to turn Orchidaceae or Stamen into a long list of term definitions is not likely to be good for those articles. Kingdon 13:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
What about in humans? Among my gay friends, monandrous is a preferred substitute term for monogamous. Ydhirsch (talk) 03:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)