Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/138 (number): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:26, 17 March 2005

This number is not notable because it is notable. Extreme delete. Thue | talk 14:44, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ah, the good old interesting number paradox. Delete unless anything more can be said. sjorford →•← 15:47, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Proof that all integers are interesting (and should be kept?):

1 is intersting and notable, OK
Assume k is interesting and notable, need to prove that k+1 is interesting and notable.
If n is interesting and notable, then n+1 is interesting and notable for being one higher than an interesting and notable number.
So k+1 is interesting and notable.
By principle of induction all numbers are interesting and notable, but we do not have space for that unfortunately.
Conclusion: This article should be deleted. Sjakkalle 08:26, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 This number is not notable because it is notable. '''Extreme delete'''. [[User:Thue|Thue]] | [[User talk:Thue|talk]] 14:44, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah, the good old [[interesting number paradox]]. '''Delete''' unless anything more can be said. [[User:Sjorford|sjorford]] [[User talk:Sjorford|&rarr;&bull;&larr;]] 15:47, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
+*Proof that all integers are interesting (and should be kept?):
+#1 is intersting and notable, OK
+#Assume k is interesting and notable, need to prove that k+1 is interesting and notable.
+#If n is interesting and notable, then n+1 is interesting and notable for being one higher than an interesting and notable number.
+#So k+1 is interesting and notable.
+#By principle of induction all numbers are interesting and notable, but we do not have space for that unfortunately.
+#Conclusion: This article should be '''deleted'''. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] 08:26, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)