Jump to content

User talk:FMSky: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Reply
Line 4: Line 4:


It is impressive the amount of work you have put into the main article "Personal life of Clint Eastwood." Thank you for the link, now I understand. All the best to you and your endeavors! :) [[User:Beth Timken|Beth Timken]] ([[User talk:Beth Timken|talk]]) 14:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
It is impressive the amount of work you have put into the main article "Personal life of Clint Eastwood." Thank you for the link, now I understand. All the best to you and your endeavors! :) [[User:Beth Timken|Beth Timken]] ([[User talk:Beth Timken|talk]]) 14:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

:Stop hacking wikipedia!! [[Special:Contributions/125.136.223.164|125.136.223.164]] ([[User talk:125.136.223.164|talk]]) 11:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)


== Nomination of [[:Cringe pop]] for deletion ==
== Nomination of [[:Cringe pop]] for deletion ==

Revision as of 11:30, 13 November 2022

Clint Eastwood - Personal life

It is impressive the amount of work you have put into the main article "Personal life of Clint Eastwood." Thank you for the link, now I understand. All the best to you and your endeavors! :) Beth Timken (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop hacking wikipedia!! 125.136.223.164 (talk) 11:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cringe pop for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cringe pop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cringe pop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Python Drink (talk) 23:36, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Izzard

Hi, @fmsky. You reverted my edits re: 'rambling monologues' and I wonder if you might reconsider. I've made a note at the Talk page of the article to point out that Izzard's monologues are not rambling as they are planned and scripted, but are simply stylised to appear rambling. Could you let me know what you think? All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 10:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sid Wilson DOB

Interesting one. This is essentially a blog post directly reporting on an Instagram post. Per WP:SOCIALMEDIA, self-published sources can't be used for information about third parties (Wilson being the third party here). The question is: do we consider the "reporting" done by Revolver here (which is merely screenshotting a social media post) to validate the information given? Rift (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i replaced it with a better source from loudwire, should be ok now --FMSky (talk) 21:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the genre warring of Anonymous User #47.

Hello, FMSky. If possible, I would like to request your input on this incidents noticeboard thread regarding the genre warring edits of anonymous user 47.149.223.192. I am contacting you because you have posted on the editor's user talk page, giving the first warning against their genre meddling. Thank you. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 07:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dawg wtf

bro wtf why do u revert every edit i make bruh on some of the stuff am just re-wording and not even adding extra fr stop reverting every fuckin edit i do Autograph84 (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cause most of the edits introduce numerous grammatical or punctuation errors. seriously, did you even proofread this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Shine_On_(Humble_Pie_song)&diff=prev&oldid=1118537144

"Shine On is a song by English rock band Humble Pie. Released in 1971 from the band's album Rock On, which was also released in that same year by A&M Records. The song was written by the band's former guitarist Peter Frampton, it would also be the last album to feature Frampton. The B-side of the single is "Mister Ring", which was written by the band's bassist Greg Ridley."

see also WP:CIR --FMSky (talk) 04:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why the reverted

why you revert all my edits did you know how hard it is

Songwriter revert on John 5 page

Hello. I noticed you removed "songwriter" from the John 5 (guitarist) page under his occupation. The dictionary definition of songwriter is someone who "composes words or music or both especially for popular songs" [1]. 5 is credited with co-writing with many artists he has worked with including Zombie, Manson, Roth etc. A songwriter does not need to write lyrics to a song to be known as a songwriter. I have put this back in and added an explanation for reverting your change. EmmaJL5 13:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Up on Dana Strum page

Hello, FMSky. Thank you for cleaning up some technical issues in the article about Dana Strum. As for the information, a lot of it was removed for no good reason or any argumentation whatsoever.

  1. You removed "musician, songwriter, record producer" both from the article and music artist box under his occupation. But he doesn't only play bass, he also writes songs (both as a composer and a lyricist) and produces records for other bands/artists. Let's use some of the featured articles (which are considered to be some of the best articles Wikipedia has to offer) for reference. Paul McCartney's page states Singer, songwriter, musician, record and film producer as his occupations although he played bass in The Beatles. John Lennon's occupations are singer, songwriter, musician. Ringo Starr is a musician, singer, songwriter, actor. Mick Jagger's page has singer, songwriter, actor, film producer under his occupation although he's primarily known to be a lead singer of the Rolling Stones. Following the example of the above-mentioned pages on Wikipedia which are considered to be the best on Wikipedia, I hope you don't mind me reverting this change you made on Dana Strum's page.
  2. You removed "US-based [[hard rock]]" band Slaughter. Let me explain. There is another band called Slaughter but in Canada. To avoid the confusion, I think it's better to keep US-base in the description. As for the type of music, you replaced "hard rock" with "glam metal". The thing is the band themselves define their style as hard rock (please check their official website), so I think it will be better to keep it this way.
  3. You removed "an [[American Music Awards]] winner" for Slaughter along with the references to support that. Again, let's refer to the examples of one of the best pages on Wikipedia for Paul McCartney, John Lennon, Ringo Starr and Mick Jagger. The introductory parts of all these articles mention the awards and achievements of the bands they used to be or are still with such as inductions into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame or reaching No. 1 on the UK or US singles charts. Therefore, I believe this fact deserves to be reverted as well.
  4. You completely removed Awards & Achievement section from the article leaving "rm advertisement, these are band awards" as an explanation. I admit, most of them are awards that he got as a member of the band Slaughter, although there were also a couple of them he got as an engineer and producer of the records. Once again, let's go back to the example of the featured articles (best of the best on Wikipedia) for Paul McCartney, John Lennon, Ringo Starr and Mick Jagger. Paul McCartney#Awards and honours states the awards he received as a member of the Beatles as well as his personal awards. John Lennon#Accolades mentions the awards and achievements he got while being a member of the Beatles, not just his personal ones. The same is true for Ringo Starr#Awards and honours. Mick Jagger#Honours lists that he was inducted into the American Rock and Roll Hall of Fame alongside the other Stones. I wonder why those are not considered advertisements and why the discrimination against this page. It just makes sense that if a band gets an award, it is thanks to the collective efforts of all the band members. Let's take group sports, for instance. If a soccer, hockey or basketball team wins a championship, every single player who took part in it is considered to be a champion, not just the Team. Based on that I have to put the Awards section back.
  5. And last but not least. You put a COI (Conflict of interest) plaque on the page as I as the main contributor to the page somehow appear to be in close connection with the subject. I'm sincerely flattered but will appreciate it (and I believe it will be the right thing to do) if you could list the reasons and facts you based your conclusion on. I don't share my personal opinion on the page, more than 95% of the information on the page is backed up by references, for many of the facts I managed to cite several sources to give the most neutral point of you I could. Please consider removing the message if you can't back up your reasoning or let me know how to dispute that.
  6. I will add the above explanations when reverting your changes on Dana Strum page.

Thank you for your time,

Switch827 (talk) 03:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protection duration

I see the issues which are causing you to request protection on these BLPs, and any data you might accumulate will be helpful eventually. I wish I could make these protections more lasting, but the lack of previous protection history somewhat restrains my doing so at this time. If these regimes need extension, obviously we're going to respond, but I want to do the least harm as possible by preventing unregistered editing. Thanks for your reports, your trustworthiness, and your understanding. When I see your username attached to a report, I know protection will be needed. That helps. BusterD (talk) 18:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, unfortunately it seems like a IP range block for this obsessed user won't be possible https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ponyo/Archive_58#Pesky_IP_from_India_/_BLP_violations so this is probably the only way to deal with it for now --FMSky (talk) 18:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Which is why trusted eyes are our best defense, admins needing to sleep at least an hour or so a day... Your effort is appreciated. BusterD (talk) 18:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source for drama on Blonde (2022)

I have found a source for drama [1] João Cannabrava (talk) 19:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie Underwood's music genre

I was actually mirroring other singers' lead paragraphs, where their music genres are not stated, but rather kept in their respective infoboxes. Labeling singers, restricting them to one single genre, is a common thing among country music fans. You don't see other singers being labeled "R&B", "Pop" singers etc, do you? It's like an obsession country fans have. I don't find that to be fair, especially when Underwood has sung in multiple genres, including having a full Gospel studio album. She is not just a country singer. She's a singer and songwriter, plain and simple.

ChrisBS (talk) 19:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]