Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jews in Tunisia: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Alex '05 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
*'''Keep''' --[[User:Mrfixter|Mrfixter]] 12:16, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' --[[User:Mrfixter|Mrfixter]] 12:16, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Has potential for expansion. --[[User:Decius|Decius]] 09:21, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Has potential for expansion. --[[User:Decius|Decius]] 09:21, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. What Jmabel said. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></sup> 14:58, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:58, 17 March 2005

At first glance it looks like a disambig page. But all it has is a link to Islam and Judaism and two links to articles of groups of Jewish people. Neither of those articles mention Tunisia. This article doesn't make a lot of sense as it's currently written. DaveTheRed 08:07, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 11:07, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can only barely imagine an encyclopaedic article of this title, and can't see how to get there from here - David Gerard 13:22, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand — It appears to be part of a series of articles linked from Jews by country, many of which are substantial pages. So to me it just looks like a stub at the moment. — RJH 17:36, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. It makes no sense to create articles about Jews in different countries and then redirect users to Judaism and Islam as if Islam is synonymous with Arab countries. --Prisk 22:14, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong keep. Valid and important historical article subject. --Gene_poole 01:02, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - compare Jews in Algeria. Was well short of the stub bar, admittedly, but I've expanded it to a stub. - Mustafaa 08:04, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Concur with David, delete. Radiant! 09:02, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn jewcruft. ComCat 09:11, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Neutralitytalk 03:33, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Stubby, but has perfectly good article potential. I can't imagine why anyone would doubt the potential to write an article on almost any ethnic group with a significant history in a given country. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:50, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Eliezer 06:18, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep --Mrfixter 12:16, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Has potential for expansion. --Decius 09:21, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. What Jmabel said. Jayjg (talk) 14:58, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)