Jump to content

User talk:CloudSurferUK: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m November 2022: punctuation
Tag: Reverted
Tags: Reverted Reply
Line 35: Line 35:
:It was a factual edit, not an unconstructive one. Can you please explain why it was incorrect. Almost all Wikipedia articles where a name change has taken place show the name at Birth. [[User:CloudSurferUK|CloudSurferUK]] ([[User talk:CloudSurferUK#top|talk]]) 11:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
:It was a factual edit, not an unconstructive one. Can you please explain why it was incorrect. Almost all Wikipedia articles where a name change has taken place show the name at Birth. [[User:CloudSurferUK|CloudSurferUK]] ([[User talk:CloudSurferUK#top|talk]]) 11:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
::It was absolutely unconstructive. We don't gratuitously deadname people on Wikipedia. The policy can be found here: [[MOS:DEADNAME]]. Please do not do it again. [[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 12:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
::It was absolutely unconstructive. We don't gratuitously deadname people on Wikipedia. The policy can be found here: [[MOS:DEADNAME]]. Please do not do it again. [[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 12:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
:::It wasn't unconstructive, it was a fact! it just wasn't woke enough for you. Quite sad when people let their personal views interfere with factual data. [[User:CloudSurferUK|CloudSurferUK]] ([[User talk:CloudSurferUK#top|talk]]) 14:11, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:11, 19 November 2022

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, CloudSurferUK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Amalthea 10:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly been delting links relating to Pan Am 103, in particular Justiceforlockerbie.com. This website is a source of publication of official reports, information and news regarding the subject of Pan Am Flight 103. Just because you look at a name and make a decision based on that you delete it. The website is 100% relevant to the pages it is posted on so please do not remove it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CloudSurferUK (talkcontribs) 10:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I've removed the link from any page. However, there's a section on the talk page of the article about that link. If you want to keep it in the article permanently, I would strongly recommend to make your case for it there, otherwise another editor will most probably come along and remove it again. Personally, my first intuition is that we shouldn't have it in the external links section since it appears to lead to a biased, non-neutral page (see WP:External links). Opinions obviously differ though, so please go to Talk:Pan Am Flight 103 and explain what you think.
Thank you, Amalthea 10:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I owe you an apology as well, I read the contribs wrong. Sorry. :) CloudSurferUK

No worries, it happens. Cheers, Amalthea 10:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the standard Articles for Deletion templates here: [1]. TheFeds 21:29, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it for you. Cheers, Amalthea 21:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Amalthea.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Examiner.com

examiner.com is nothing more than a collection of blog posts. There is no editorial review policy. It is not a reliable source. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 03:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at India Willoughby. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 02:25, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was a factual edit, not an unconstructive one. Can you please explain why it was incorrect. Almost all Wikipedia articles where a name change has taken place show the name at Birth. CloudSurferUK (talk) 11:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was absolutely unconstructive. We don't gratuitously deadname people on Wikipedia. The policy can be found here: MOS:DEADNAME. Please do not do it again. DanielRigal (talk) 12:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't unconstructive, it was a fact! it just wasn't woke enough for you. Quite sad when people let their personal views interfere with factual data. CloudSurferUK (talk) 14:11, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]