Jump to content

User talk:92.15.144.174: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
General note: Editing tests on Bill Cosby in advertising.
Tags: Twinkle Reverted
Line 8: Line 8:


[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Cameron Dewe|Cameron Dewe]]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/92.15.144.174|your recent contributions]]&#32;to [[:Talk:Countess of Chester Hospital baby deaths]] have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]] or the [[Wikipedia:Help desk|Help desk]]. WikiProject banners are placed on talk pages because those articles are assessed to be of interest to the WikiProjects concerned. Removing the banners deprives a WikiProject of oversight of the quality of an article that is within its scope. Just because a crime has not yet been proven in this case does not mean it is not ''crime-related''. Clearly the Police think the deaths are crime related because charges have been laid against a person. That there is reasonable cause to suspect a crime has occurred is sufficient for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Crime|WikiProject Crime]] to be interested in this article.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> - [[User:Cameron Dewe|Cameron Dewe]] ([[User talk:Cameron Dewe|talk]]) 11:10, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Cameron Dewe|Cameron Dewe]]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/92.15.144.174|your recent contributions]]&#32;to [[:Talk:Countess of Chester Hospital baby deaths]] have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]] or the [[Wikipedia:Help desk|Help desk]]. WikiProject banners are placed on talk pages because those articles are assessed to be of interest to the WikiProjects concerned. Removing the banners deprives a WikiProject of oversight of the quality of an article that is within its scope. Just because a crime has not yet been proven in this case does not mean it is not ''crime-related''. Clearly the Police think the deaths are crime related because charges have been laid against a person. That there is reasonable cause to suspect a crime has occurred is sufficient for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Crime|WikiProject Crime]] to be interested in this article.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> - [[User:Cameron Dewe|Cameron Dewe]] ([[User talk:Cameron Dewe|talk]]) 11:10, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]]. An edit that you recently made to [[:Bill Cosby in advertising]] seemed to be a test and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you want to practice editing, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:Tacyarg|my talk page]]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-test1 --> [[User:Tacyarg|Tacyarg]] ([[User talk:Tacyarg|talk]]) 18:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
{{Block indent|''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself or [[Special:UserLogin|logging in with an existing account]] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->


== Have you considered making an account? ==
== Have you considered making an account? ==

Revision as of 18:36, 19 November 2022

Murthy and wealth

I've mentioned your edit here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Akshata_Murty#Personal_wealth_ranking please join the discussion. CT55555 (talk) 14:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Stanley Johnson (writer), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm Cameron Dewe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Countess of Chester Hospital baby deaths have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. WikiProject banners are placed on talk pages because those articles are assessed to be of interest to the WikiProjects concerned. Removing the banners deprives a WikiProject of oversight of the quality of an article that is within its scope. Just because a crime has not yet been proven in this case does not mean it is not crime-related. Clearly the Police think the deaths are crime related because charges have been laid against a person. That there is reasonable cause to suspect a crime has occurred is sufficient for WikiProject Crime to be interested in this article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 11:10, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Tacyarg. An edit that you recently made to Bill Cosby in advertising seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tacyarg (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Have you considered making an account?

Hi, I've noticed you working across various political articles, and you seem to be doing some good work. Have you considered creating an account? There's a few benefits, which you can see here: WP:ACCOUNT. Can I assume 92.30.72.123 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is also you? — Czello 15:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is indeed me as well! Easy to tell from the edit history. Thank you for the compliment, but I haven't considered creating an account as of now. That could change in the future, however. --92.15.144.174 (talk) 15:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! Thanks for your contributions to Premiership of Rishi Sunak. I suggest that you seriously consider creating an account, as not only does it hide your IP address (which can be used to geolocate you) but you'll also gain access to additional privileges both immediately and over time such as translation tools, the Wikipedia Library, editing protected and controversial pages, and more. Thank you again for your contributions! InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 00:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the positive feedback! And I shall definitely consider it. --92.15.144.174 (talk) 00:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Premiership of Rishi Sunak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Moops T 17:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi! You might be interested in the articles in this template. Do you agree that the "list of living spouses" should be removed from them? Surtsicna (talk) 10:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree they should be, for the same reasons as the living former prime ministers. --92.15.144.174 (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2010 Labour Party leadership election (UK)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]