User talk:QueerEcofeminist

Scripts installed locally

Scripts Installed Globally

Scripts Localized by me

My kitchen

Things I am working on

My mistakes and learning from them

My offline wiki activities

CSD log

Earlier Discussions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Generation_Lab

Thanks so much! I really appreciate your response and your advice. I'm still a bit confused with what you'd recommend in terms of "significant amount of coverage." I'm quite sure this company has what you're describing, so I want to make sure we fully understand exactly what you'd recommend! Thanks so much again, and please stay well.

I'd love your advice -- it looks like you declined the draft I submitted (in the subject line), and I'd love to understand why that is. I was sure to include several articles written about the subject (Business Insider, Inside Higher Ed, Williams College Record, etc.), as well as substantiating every claim about the subject with verifiable sources (ex: NBC News, Axios, PBS, etc.).

Thanks so much for your attention, and hope to get your thoughts so we can successfully submit! Thanks so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CollegeTrendingNews (talk • contribs) 21:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

@CollegeTrendingNews,

There are multiple problems with this page as this is too soon we are yet to be there at notability where we can say this company is company is notable enough to have an article here. We need significant amount of coverage and contribution to the field. Which is lacking at the momement. Future plans are useless in this regard. QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 02:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Clitorophallus (also referred to as "clitoropenis")

Hi,

You left me a message about the page I'm trying to get Wikipedia to publish. I hope this is the proper way to respond. I'm not super-Wikipedia-skilled.

I didn't really create the page because it has something to do with being Queer. I'm an advocate for genital autonomy and believe that if people better understood how genitalia is basically the same regardless of sex, they may better see the hypocrisy of advocating for genital autonomy for only people on one end of the sexual spectrum.

I would certainly appreciate any suggestions you have to get it published.

Thanks! John Adkison

Definitely, I would love to and I should actually contribute to the article too. Let me see what I can do. I am still failing to understand the hypocrisy part of your statement but hopefully I will understand that in meantime QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 05:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft of Bhagwan Das Varma

Re: Draft of Bhagwan Das Varma

Thank you for taking the time to review the Bhagwan Das Varma draft. As per your suggestions, 8 cites to books and 2 cites to scholarly articles have been added. All of these additions were very helpful in improving the article. The revised article with these additions has been submitted.

New Articles cited:

• John, Kose; Ravid, S. Abraham; Sunder, Jayanthi (2017). "Managerial Ability and Success: Evidence from the Career Paths of Film Directors". Journal of Corporate Finance. Elsevier. 44: 425–439. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.11.001. ISSN 0929-1199.

• Allègre, Hadida L. (2009). "Motion Picture Performance: A Review and Research Agenda". International Journal of Management Reviews. John Wiley & Sons Limited. 11: 297–335. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00240.x. ISSN 1468-2370.

New Books cited:

• • Rajadhyaksha, Ashish (1994). Encyclopedia of Indian cinema. Taylor & Francis. p. 84. ISBN 9780195635799.

• • Akbar, Khatija (1997). Madhubala: Her Life, Her Films. Hay House. pp. 111–112. ISBN 978-93-80480-81-7.

• • Deep, Mohan (1996). The Mystery and Mystique of Madhubala. Magna Publishing Co. Ltd. pp. 52–59. ISBN 1906574219.

• • Block, Alex Ben (2010). George Lucas's Blockbusting: A Decade-by-Decade Survey of Timeless Movies Including Untold Secrets of Their Financial and Cultural Success. HarperCollins. p. 323. ISBN 9780061963452.

• • Birchard, Robert (2009). Cecil B. DeMille's Hollywood. University Press of Kentucky. p. 334. ISBN 9780813138299.

• • Bajwa, Seva Singh (2018). Facets of Indian Cinema. K. K. Publications. pp. 33–38. ISBN 978-8178443188.

• • Lev, Peter (2006). Transforming the Screen, 1950–1959. Vol. 7 of History of the American Cinema. University of California Press. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-520-24966-0.

• • Hall, Sheldon; Neale, Steve (2010). Epics, Spectacles, and Blockbusters: A Hollywood History. Wayne State University Press. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-8143-3008-1.

Scholar165 (talk) 23:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Akashanand Deshpande

Hello. I have inserted the images of Akashanand Deshpande on his website but they are deleted. Why has it happened? Can you please put them back — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaditid (talk • contribs) 12:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

I requested deletion of those images as they were copyvio. Upload only photos which you have taken or you are ready to talk to copyright owners for relicencing of those photos. thanks QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 13:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Dcypher Studios

Hi, I declined the draft article Draft:Black Note Graffiti. The new name of the draft's creator is shown in the edit history, but for some reason the AfC-submit-wizard posted the talk page message at the old username's talk page. Did a step get missed in the change of username, or is that more likely to be a problem with AfC-submit-wizard? Thanks, Storchy (talk) 06:16, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Storchy, I guess the rename happened when you rejected the draft. The same time for both the events could be the only answer to your question. Otherwise there is no reason to why your rejection warning could go to their earlier usertalkpage. QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 11:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

NPP Award for 2019

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. Also, we notice you haven't been very active here recently, and hope you will consider increasing your participation. The backlog is relatively high and we could really use your help. Regardless, thanks again for your past effort. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

1819 News Page

Hello,

I appreciate your looking at the page Draft:1819 News. I attempted to put around the same amount of information that I saw on the published page Yellowhammer News. Is that a good template to go off of our should I look to put more information. I'm trying to balance what is necessary versus what would appear to be "promotional material." Thanks so much!

Bamafan1994 Bamafan1994 (talk) 14:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Ideally you should be looking at BBC News, The New York Times, or something similar if you want to follow ideal/best scenario for style and kind of citations used and not something which is at lower rank of the sector. QueerEcofeminist🌈 14:51, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

@Bamafan1994 QueerEcofeminist🌈 14:51, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Gotcha, that makes sense.Thank you! Bamafan1994 (talk) 14:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Request on 07:57:07, 6 October 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Iris van Straten

• Iris van Straten (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:NewBe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello!

I am trying to submit a very basic article about a film production company. For some reason it keeps bouncing back stating it has are no reliable sources/references. I looked at similar companies that do have published Wikipedia articles and I honestly don't see a lot of difference. What am I doing wrong?

Iris van Straten (talk) 07:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

@Iris van Straten, I would suggest that you review Warner Bros. and Paramount Pictures and follow their style of sources. Thanks. You are supposed to follow the stalwarts and not newbies. Thanks QueerEcofeminist🌈 08:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	thank you for your continuous work That Prussian1872 (talk) 13:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Query

Hello, QueerEcofeminist,

I have a question for you as a global renamer. Occasionally, I'm looking at the Move log and I see you have moved pages for an editor you have renamed and I can see that the editor is blocked on English Wikipedia. But tonight, over the past few hours, I saw two blocked editors who were given renames! What is the policy for this? I'm not sure how global renaming works but I wouldn't think that a blocked editor would be able to request a rename. It can be confusing for admins like myself who might be keeping tabs on recently blocked editors. I'm hoping you can clarify things to me. Many thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for just username violation can be renamed but if users are blocked for more than username violation shouldn't be renamed. I am not sure which renames you are talking about. But if you provide me the links I will check with it. Users blocked for socking, promotional edit or anything else shouldn't be renamed. QueerEcofeminist🌈 11:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@Liz, additionally they are blocked locally but accounts are global and rename happens on metawiki. So though they are blocked locally they can request rename and it will be processed by renamers or stewards if it is a just username policy violation. In the case of possible coi users we do assume good faith and rename them. But those who have already done promotional edits or done bad edits, page creations should not be renamed. And we do not rename them. QueerEcofeminist🌈 11:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Both of those comments make sense. I didn't consider the fact that they could be blocked on this project but not elsewhere. I'll dig a bit deeper and try to find those two renames I came across last night. Thank you for your patient explanations! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Anytime, you can drop a message and ask for whatever you feel confusing. Obviously there is a global rename policy but it almost alignes with the acc account creation guidelines. You may go through it for further information. But yes I have been there when I first saw blocked user getting renamed. I have happy that I could be of some help to others. Thanks QueerEcofeminist🌈 09:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Elemental (2023 film)

Hello. My name is ZX2006XZ. So the trailer for Pixar's Elemental came out yesterday, alongside a new teaser poster.

Trailer link: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-cT495xKvvs&t=2s

Poster link: https://twitter.com/Pixar/status/1593292209758953475?s=20&t=bs9Jk2YZhTKeZ5CDFe7hvA

I'm requesting for Draft:Elemental (2023 film) to get a re-review, as it has been rejected for article submission by you.

ZX2006XZ (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

To add to this, and as an active editor for the draft, I believe we have enough information to at least have a chance at re-reviewing it.

If it isn't, I'd like to know what else would be needed.

Best regards, madyoshi01. Madyoshi01 (talk) 19:46, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Sorry please read the instructions posted on the draft. First it's a future film and second there are too many self published sources. Such multiple accounts pleading for the review is sign of promotional attempts. So please refrain from it. QueerEcofeminist🌈 05:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)