User talk:Blueginger2: Difference between revisions
→Formatting of estimated dates: new section |
Notice: Not using edit summary. |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Hi! I have asked [[WP:SHIPS]] advice for the formatting of planned/estimated dates. Feel free to participate in the discussion on the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships#Formatting of planned/estimated dates — italicized or not|project talk page]]. [[User:Tupsumato|Tupsumato]] ([[User talk:Tupsumato|talk]]) 06:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
Hi! I have asked [[WP:SHIPS]] advice for the formatting of planned/estimated dates. Feel free to participate in the discussion on the [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships#Formatting of planned/estimated dates — italicized or not|project talk page]]. [[User:Tupsumato|Tupsumato]] ([[User talk:Tupsumato|talk]]) 06:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
== November 2022 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon|link=]] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/{{urlencode:Blueginger2|PATH}} often]|often}} edit without using an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing|your preferences]]. Thanks! <!-- Template:Summary2 --> [[User:Rsk6400|Rsk6400]] ([[User talk:Rsk6400|talk]]) 06:27, 20 November 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:27, 20 November 2022
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russian frigate Admiral Gorshkov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mil. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Do not edit other editors' talk page posts
I'm going to assume that this was an honest mistake of some sort. Please read WP:TPO. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thanks
you were correct. i somehow failed to notice the super-obvious reference to bbc... somehow. · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 20:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes I think BBC can be trusted here. Hopefully we'll get official or semiofficial specifications of Poseidon someday (I know how unrealistic this is). Blueginger2 (talk) 09:51, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
October 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments. Anomie⚔ 19:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Blueginger2. Thank you for your work on Russian submarine Generalissimus Suvorov. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Formatting of estimated dates
Hi! I have asked WP:SHIPS advice for the formatting of planned/estimated dates. Feel free to participate in the discussion on the project talk page. Tupsumato (talk) 06:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
November 2022
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 06:27, 20 November 2022 (UTC)