Elsagate: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Controversy concerning a genre of YouTube videos}} |
{{Short description|Controversy concerning a genre of YouTube videos}} |
||
[[File:Thumbnails of Elsagate content.jpg|thumb|300px|Thumbnails of Elsagate content are often represented by recognizable, family-friendly characters performing child-inappropriate or otherwise disturbing actions, either through explicit depiction or implication. Examples of the situations featured in such videos can be seen above, such as [[Injection (medicine)|injections]], [[mutilation]], [[childbirth]], [[Urine|urination]], a [[Bad Baby Crying videos|Bad Baby Crying video]] and other bathroom-related activities, [[fellatio]], and [[Acid attack|chemical burning]].]] |
[[File:Thumbnails of Elsagate content.jpg|thumb|300px|Thumbnails of Elsagate content are often represented by recognizable, family-friendly characters performing child-inappropriate or otherwise disturbing actions, either through explicit depiction or implication. Examples of the situations featured in such videos can be seen above, such as [[Injection (medicine)|injections]], [[mutilation]], [[childbirth]], [[Urine|urination]], a [[Bad Baby Crying videos|Bad Baby Crying video]] and other bathroom-related activities, [[fellatio]], and [[Acid attack|chemical burning]].]] |
||
<div style="position: relative; width: 120px"> |
|||
<div style="position: relative;">[[Image:Angry man.svg|120px]]</div> |
|||
<div style="position: absolute; z-index: 2; top: 12%; left: 15%"> |
|||
<span style="padding: 1px;">This content sucks!</span></div> |
|||
</div> |
|||
'''Elsagate''' is a [[neologism]] referring to the controversy surrounding videos on [[YouTube]] and [[YouTube Kids]] that are categorized as "[[child-friendly]]", but which contain themes that are [[Age appropriateness|inappropriate for children]]. Most videos under this classification are notable for presenting inappropriate content; those include [[graphic violence]], [[human sexuality|sexual situations]], [[Sexual fetishism|fetishes]], [[Profanity|obscene language]], [[recreational drug use|drugs]], [[drinking alcohol|alcohol]], [[Injection (medicine)|injections]], [[disease]], explicit [[toilet humor]] and dangerous or upsetting situations and activities.<ref name=inquisitr1>{{cite news |work=[[Inquisitr]] |date=Nov 13, 2017 |title=YouTube promises crackdown on disturbing and sexually violent gore videos targeted at children |url=https://www.inquisitr.com/opinion/4619073/youtube-promises-crackdown-on-disturbing-and-sexually-violent-gore-videos-targeted-at-children/ |first=Damir |last=Mujezinovic |quote=The name Elsagate is derived from bizarre videos featuring Elsa from the Disney film ''Frozen'' and Spider-Man indulging in despicable acts no child should ever see. Gore, violence, sexual fetishism, abuse, and rape are the prevailing themes in such videos. |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171119030514/https://www.inquisitr.com/opinion/4619073/youtube-promises-crackdown-on-disturbing-and-sexually-violent-gore-videos-targeted-at-children/ |archive-date=2017-11-19}}</ref> |
'''Elsagate''' is a [[neologism]] referring to the controversy surrounding videos on [[YouTube]] and [[YouTube Kids]] that are categorized as "[[child-friendly]]", but which contain themes that are [[Age appropriateness|inappropriate for children]]. Most videos under this classification are notable for presenting inappropriate content; those include [[graphic violence]], [[human sexuality|sexual situations]], [[Sexual fetishism|fetishes]], [[Profanity|obscene language]], [[recreational drug use|drugs]], [[drinking alcohol|alcohol]], [[Injection (medicine)|injections]], [[disease]], explicit [[toilet humor]] and dangerous or upsetting situations and activities.<ref name=inquisitr1>{{cite news |work=[[Inquisitr]] |date=Nov 13, 2017 |title=YouTube promises crackdown on disturbing and sexually violent gore videos targeted at children |url=https://www.inquisitr.com/opinion/4619073/youtube-promises-crackdown-on-disturbing-and-sexually-violent-gore-videos-targeted-at-children/ |first=Damir |last=Mujezinovic |quote=The name Elsagate is derived from bizarre videos featuring Elsa from the Disney film ''Frozen'' and Spider-Man indulging in despicable acts no child should ever see. Gore, violence, sexual fetishism, abuse, and rape are the prevailing themes in such videos. |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171119030514/https://www.inquisitr.com/opinion/4619073/youtube-promises-crackdown-on-disturbing-and-sexually-violent-gore-videos-targeted-at-children/ |archive-date=2017-11-19}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 13:45, 22 November 2022
Elsagate is a neologism referring to the controversy surrounding videos on YouTube and YouTube Kids that are categorized as "child-friendly", but which contain themes that are inappropriate for children. Most videos under this classification are notable for presenting inappropriate content; those include graphic violence, sexual situations, fetishes, obscene language, drugs, alcohol, injections, disease, explicit toilet humor and dangerous or upsetting situations and activities.[1]
These videos often feature popular characters from family-oriented media, sometimes via crossovers, used without legal permission. The term itself is composed of "Elsa", a character from Disney's Frozen, known for frequently appearing in such videos, and "-gate" (a suffix for scandals).[1] However, the Elsagate controversy has also included channels such as Toy Freaks that feature real children instead of child/family-friendly characters, raising concern about possible child abuse.
Most videos in this category are either live action or crude animation—although a few channels have been using more elaborate techniques such as clay animation or computer-generated imagery.[2] Despite YouTube's age restriction policies, these videos are sometimes tagged in such a way as to circumvent the inbuilt child safety algorithms, even making their way into YouTube Kids, and are thus difficult to moderate due to the large scale of the platform.[3] In order to capture search results and attract attention from users, their titles and descriptions feature names of famous characters, as well as keywords like "education", "learn colors", "nursery rhymes", etc.[4][5] They also include automatically placed ads, making them lucrative to their owners and YouTube. Despite the objectionable and often confusing nature of these videos, many attract millions of views.[4]
Public awareness of the phenomenon grew in 2017, as mainstream media started to report about child safety on YouTube. That year—after reports by several media outlets—YouTube adopted stricter guidelines regarding children's content. In late November, the company started to mass-delete channels and videos falling into the Elsagate category, as well as large amounts of other inappropriate videos or user's comments relating to children.[6]
History
Early history (2016–2017)
In June 2016, The Guardian published an article about the channel Webs and Tiaras, which had been created in March of the same year. The channel showed people dressed as characters like Spider-Man, Elsa, and the Joker engaging in bizarre or nonsensical actions. The videos themselves had background music but no dialogue. Having no script, there was no language barrier on the videos which would normally hinder worldwide distribution. The article also reported that several nearly identical channels named Toy Monster, The Superheroes Life, and The Kids Club had appeared on YouTube.[7]
In January 2017, one channel under the control of a YouTube partner in Vietnam, Spiderman Frozen Marvel Superhero Real Life, blocked their Vietnamese subscribers after complaints from parents regarding the content of their videos.[8] The channel's owner was later fined by Vietnamese authorities.[9]
The high number of views have led some to voice concerns that such channels are gaming the system by using bots or click farms to inflate viewing figures to higher proportions; however, there is no evidence for this.[7]
In February 2017, The Verge commented that "adults dressing up in costume and acting out weird, wordless skits has become a booming industry on the world's biggest video platform" and that while many videos were "puerile but benign", others featured more questionable content such as scatological humor and violent or sexual situations. The article noted that most videos were made with a very limited budget and "a few Halloween costumes", which made them easy to produce and contributed to their multiplication. It also attributed their success to the frequent use of "Freudian concerns", which young children may find fascinating, amusing, or frightening, such as "peeing, pooping, kissing, pregnancy, and the terrifying notion of going to the doctor and getting a shot".[2]
Also in February, The Awl published an article on Webs and Tiaras and similar channels, describing their content as "nonsensically nightmarish" with titles like "Frozen Elsa gets CHICKEN FEET!", "Frozen Elsa gets BRAIN BELLY!", "Frozen Elsa & Anna TEAR SPIDERMAN APART!", "EVIL SANTA KIDNAPS Frozen Elsa & Spiderman!", or "Frozen Elsa FLUSHES Spiderman in Toilet!". The website commented that the videos were "pretty twisted for children's content: some videos involve Elsa giving birth, and in some others, Spider-Man injects Elsa with a brightly colored liquid. You half expect the scenarios to be porn setups." In most videos, the like and dislike options were disabled, making it impossible to know how many users were actually engaging with them. Many videos featured hundreds of comments in gibberish, some being written by similar channels in an apparent attempt to attract more clicks.[10]
In March, the BBC ran a piece titled "The disturbing YouTube videos that are tricking children". The article focused on a Peppa Pig imitation where the titular character's teeth are painfully pulled out by a dentist, and a video featuring said character burning down an occupied house. The article also mentioned the existence of "hundreds" of similar videos, ranging from unauthorized but otherwise harmless copies of authentic cartoons to frightening and gory content.[11]
CTV News also reported in March about YouTube's "fake toons problem", with adult-themed imitations of popular children's shows frequently appearing on YouTube Kids: "In some cases, the video will feature a kid-friendly thumbnail, while the video itself might be entirely different" and be very unsuitable for small children. The network commented that such videos were "often nightmares to behold, with lots of frightening scenes involving monsters and blood. Many of these videos venture into dark territory, with the characters often being chased, attacked, or injured in a bloody manner."[12]
The term "Elsagate" was coined on the Internet in 2017. During the summer of that year, it became a popular hashtag on Twitter as users called attention to the presence of such material on YouTube and YouTube Kids.[13] On Reddit, an Elsagate subreddit (r/ElsaGate) was created on June 23 to discuss the phenomenon, soon attracting tens of thousands of users.[14]
Discovery of Elsagate videos (2017)
In November 2017, several newspapers published articles about the YouTube channel Toy Freaks, which had been created two years earlier by a single father named Greg Chism. Toy Freaks had a total of 8.54 million subscribers and were among the top 100 most viewed before it was shut down that month. The channel often featured Chism's daughters and in most cases showed them scared or crying.[15][16]
These videos could also be found in local video platforms in China, where YouTube is blocked, including Tencent, Youku, and iQiyi. Tencent have set up a specific team to monitor its video platform and permanently shut down 121 accounts and blocked more than 4,000 search keywords by January 2018.[17] The Ministry of Public Security of China suggested that netizens should report these videos once found.[18]
Several celebrities, including rapper B.o.B and comedians Joe Rogan and Philip DeFranco discussed Elsagate on social media during this time.[19][20]
On November 4, The New York Times published an article about the "startling" videos slipping past YouTube's filters and disturbing children, "either by mistake or because bad actors have found ways to fool the YouTube Kids algorithms".[4] On November 6, author James Bridle published a piece titled Something is wrong on the internet on Medium, in which he commented about the "thousands and thousands of these videos": "Someone or something or some combination of people and things is using YouTube to systematically frighten, traumatize, and abuse children, automatically and at scale". Bridle also observed that the confusing content of many videos seemed to result from the constant "overlaying and intermixing" of various popular tropes, characters, or keywords. As a result, even videos with actual humans started resembling automated content, while "obvious parodies and even the shadier knock-offs" interacted with "the legions of algorithmic content producers" until it became "completely impossible to know what is going on".[5] On November 17, Internet commentator Philip DeFranco posted a video addressing "the insane YouTube Kids problem".[21]
The New York Times found that one of the channels featuring counterfeit cartoons, Super Zeus TV, was linked to a website called SuperKidsShop.com, registered in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. A man working for SuperKidsShop.com confirmed that his partners were responsible for the videos, on which "a team of about 100 people" were producing. Subsequent requests for an interview went unanswered.[4]
On November 9, members of the satirical sound collage group Negativland presented an episode of their weekly radio show Over the Edge dedicated to Elsagate. "Modern Animal Kids"[22] "threads Elsagate through a remix of three 90's episodes of Over the Edge which focused on media for children, all broadcast in the final years before Teletubbies pioneered marketing to the 6- to 18-month-old demographic".[23]
On November 22, BuzzFeed News published an article about unsettling videos that depict children in disturbing and abusive situations. The information on the article came with the assistance of journalist and human rights activist Matan Uziel, whose investigation and report to the FBI on that matter were sent on September 22, informing its leadership about "tens of thousands of videos available on YouTube that we know are crafted to serve as eye candy for perverted, creepy adults, online predators to indulge in their child fantasies".[24]
On November 23, French-Canadian outlet Tabloïd released a video investigation about Toy Monster, a channel linked to Webs and Tiaras. They confronted the videos' creators – based out of the south shore of Quebec City – who refused to be interviewed. One of the actors featured in the videos anonymously stated that he was contractually obligated to refrain from commenting. The investigation revealed that identical content was being posted on numerous channels apparently operated by the same people.[25]
On November 28, Forbes presented Elsagate as an example of the "dark underbelly of the digital age". The article's author commented that the "gargantuan scale" of the problem seemed to indicate that children's content on YouTube had become "a monster beyond our control" and that "it's terrifying to imagine how many toddlers have been affected" by Elsagate, "in ways beyond our comprehension".[26]
Effect on children
Several parents, teenagers, or peers posting on the /r/ElsaGate subreddit expressed fears that the videos were traumatizing to children and may desensitize or normalize inappropriate content.[27]
The New York Times quoted pediatrics professor Michael Rich, who stated that these videos were potentially harmful to children who could find them even more upsetting, as "characters they thought they knew and trusted" were shown behaving in an improper or violent manner.[4]
Response from YouTube
In August 2017, YouTube announced its new guidelines on content and monetization. In an ongoing series of efforts to demonetize controversial and offensive videos, it was announced that creators would no longer be able to monetize videos that "made inappropriate use of family-friendly characters".[citation needed] In November of the same year, it announced that it would implement "a new policy that age restricts this content in the YouTube main app when flagged".[28]
The controversy extended to channels that featured not necessarily children's characters but actual children, who sometimes performed inappropriate or dangerous activities under the guidance of adults. As part of a broader action, YouTube terminated the channel Toy Freaks, which featured a father (Greg Chism) and his two daughters in potentially abusive situations.[29][30][31] Chism was subsequently investigated by child-protection officials in Illinois and Missouri for alleged child abuse.[15][32][33] In December 2017, authorities announced that Chism would not face criminal charges.[34] Before its removal, the channel had over 8.5 million subscribers.[29][30][31]
It was also revealed in the media that many videos featuring minors – frequently uploaded by the children themselves and showing innocent content – had attracted comments from pedophiles and other groups. Some of these videos were monetized. As a result of the controversy, several major advertisers froze spending on YouTube, forcing YouTube to ban children from their site, citing legal obligations.[26][35][36]
On November 22, 2017, YouTube announced that it had deleted over 50 channels and thousands of videos that did not fit the new guidelines.[37] On November 27, the company said in a statement to BuzzFeed News that it had "terminated more than 270 accounts and removed over 150,000 videos", "turned off comments on more than 625,000 videos targeted by child predators" and "removed ads from nearly 2 million videos and over 50,000 channels masquerading as family-friendly content".[38] Forbes contributor Dani Di Placido wrote that many problematic videos could still be seen on the platform, and that "the sheer volume of videos hastily deleted from the site prove that YouTube's algorithms were utterly ineffective at protecting young children".[26]
See also
- Shock site, a similar method
- Toy Freaks, a controversial YouTube channel run by Gregory Chism
- FamilyOFive, a YouTube channel which was at the centre of a scandal in 2017 over child abuse featured in its videos
- Fantastic Adventures scandal, a 2019 YouTube scandal involving the owner of a channel inflicting intentional child abuse on her children featured in the videos
- Momo Challenge hoax, an alleged internet challenge in 2019 which became the subject of a moral panic
- Internet screamers, controversial pranks using jumpscares and loud noises
- YouTube § Child protection
- Child Online Protection Act (COPA) and Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
- Rule 34
- Rule 63
- Not safe for work (NSFW)
- Not safe for life (NSFL)
- Cartoon pornography
References
- ^ a b Mujezinovic, Damir (Nov 13, 2017). "YouTube promises crackdown on disturbing and sexually violent gore videos targeted at children". Inquisitr. Archived from the original on 2017-11-19.
The name Elsagate is derived from bizarre videos featuring Elsa from the Disney film Frozen and Spider-Man indulging in despicable acts no child should ever see. Gore, violence, sexual fetishism, abuse, and rape are the prevailing themes in such videos.
- ^ a b Ben Popper, Adults dressed as superheroes is YouTube’s new, strange, and massively popular genre Archived 2017-11-13 at the Wayback Machine, The Verge, 4 February 2017.
- ^ "Does 'Elsagate' prove YouTube is too big to control?". The Week. 25 November 2017. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
- ^ a b c d e Sapna Maheshwari, On YouTube Kids, Startling Videos Slip Past Filters Archived 2019-06-26 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, 4 November 2017.
- ^ a b James Bridle, Something is wrong on the internet Archived 2017-11-23 at the Wayback Machine, Medium, 6 November 2017.
- ^ Johanna Wright, 5 ways we’re toughening our approach to protect families on YouTube and YouTube Kids Archived 2018-01-25 at the Wayback Machine, Official YouTube Blog, 22 November 2017.
- ^ a b YouTube's latest hit: neon superheroes, giant ducks and plenty of lycra Archived 2017-11-23 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 29 June 2016.
- ^ Nam, Dinh (18 January 2017). "Vietnamese parents shocked over adult content in YouTube videos for children". VnExpress International. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved November 24, 2017.
- ^ Vietnam man fined for suggestive YouTube parody channel Archived 2017-11-23 at the Wayback Machine, Tuoi Tre News, 19 January 2017.
- ^ Rachel Deal, The Ballad Of Elsa And Spiderman Archived 2017-12-01 at the Wayback Machine, TheAwl.com, 23 February 2017.
- ^ "The disturbing YouTube videos that are tricking children". BBC News. 2017-03-27. Archived from the original on 2019-06-26. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
- ^ Fake toons: Kids falling prey to adult parodies of popular children's shows Archived 2017-12-01 at the Wayback Machine, CTV News, 28 March 2017.
- ^ 'ElsaGate' hashtag calling attention to disturbing YouTube content Archived 2017-11-23 at the Wayback Machine, WGN9, 26 July 2017.
- ^ Elsagate: The disturbing YouTube trend that might be terrifying your children Archived 2017-11-26 at the Wayback Machine, Newshub, 24 November 2017.
- ^ a b "YouTuber with ties to St. Louis allegedly under investigation for questionable videos". KSDK. 1 December 2017. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
- ^ Koerber, Brian (11 November 2017). "YouTube bans the creepy and weird kid channel 'Toy Freaks'". Mashable. Archived from the original on 19 January 2018. Retrieved 25 January 2018.
- ^ "Chinese video platforms urged to delete violent 'Elsagate' content". Global Times. 2018-01-22. Archived from the original on 22 January 2018. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
- ^ "公安部:儿童邪典片流入中国 各大视频网站全面清除" (in Simplified Chinese). 封面新闻. 2018-01-22. Archived from the original on 22 January 2018. Retrieved 22 January 2018.
- ^ Schroeder, Audra (6 July 2017). "B.o.B. discovers the weird world of pregnant Elsa videos". The Daily Dot. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 25 November 2017.
- ^ Rogan, Joe (18 November 2017). "Tweet". Twitter. Archived from the original on 27 September 2018. Retrieved 25 November 2017.
- ^ Why We Need To Talk About The Insane YouTube Kids Problem Archived 2017-11-23 at the Wayback Machine, 17 November 2017.
- ^ Episode downloadable at negativland.com's OTE files Archived 2018-01-07 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Negativland, "Six Hours of Content Together Through Life Archived 2019-02-03 at the Wayback Machine". Facebook post dated 1 December 2017.
- ^ Warzel, Charlie (22 November 2017). "YouTube Is Addressing Its Massive Child Exploitation Problem". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on 22 November 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- ^ Derrière le masque de Spiderman(in French), Tabloid, 23 November 2017.
- ^ a b c Dani Di Placido, YouTube's "Elsagate" Illuminates The Unintended Horrors Of The Digital Age Archived 2017-12-01 at the Wayback Machine, Forbes, 28 November 2017.
- ^ Mujezinovic, Damir (Nov 13, 2017). "YouTube promises crackdown on disturbing and sexually violent gore videos targeted at children". Inquisitr. Archived from the original on 2017-11-19.
- ^ Popper, Ben (9 November 2017). "YouTube says it will crack down on bizarre videos targeting children". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2017-11-16.
In August of this year, YouTube announced that it would no longer allow creators to monetize videos which "made inappropriate use of family-friendly characters". Today it's taking another step to try and police this genre.
- ^ a b Todd Spangler, YouTube Terminates Toy Freaks Channel Amid Broader Crackdown on Disturbing Kids’ Content Archived 2018-01-29 at the Wayback Machine, Variety, 17 November 2017.
- ^ a b Sarah Templeton, Disturbing 'ElsaGate', 'Toy Freaks' videos removed from YouTube after abuse allegations Archived 2017-11-24 at the Wayback Machine, Newshub, 22 November 2017.
- ^ a b Charlie Warzel, YouTube Is Addressing Its Massive Child Exploitation Problem Archived 2017-11-29 at the Wayback Machine, BuzzFeed, 22 November 2017.
- ^ Gibbons, Katie (30 November 2017). "Toy Freaks YouTube video father Greg Chism faces abuse inquiry". The Times. Archived from the original on 3 December 2017. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
- ^ Smidt, Remy (30 November 2017). "Authorities Say YouTube's Toy Freaks Dad Is Under Investigation — But They Won't Say Who's In Charge". BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on 3 December 2017. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
- ^ Gutelle, Sam (2017-12-07). "After Investigation, Father Behind Terminated YouTube Channel Toy Freaks Won't Face Criminal Charges". Tubefilter. Archived from the original on 2018-06-30. Retrieved 2018-06-30.
- ^ Todd Spangler, YouTube Faces Advertiser Boycott Over Videos With Kids That Attracted Sexual Predators Archived 2018-01-29 at the Wayback Machine, Variety, 25 November 2017.
- ^ Mostrous, Alexi; Bridge, Mark; Gibbons, Katie (24 November 2017). "YouTube adverts fund paedophile habits". The Times. Archived from the original on 26 November 2017. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
- ^ YouTube to crack down on videos showing child endangerment Archived 2017-11-24 at the Wayback Machine, ABC News, 22 November 2017.
- ^ YouTube Has Deleted Hundreds Of Thousands Of Disturbing Kids' Videos Archived 2017-11-28 at the Wayback Machine, BuzzFeed, 28 November 2017.
External links
- Bridle, James (April 2018). The nightmare videos of children's YouTube — and what's wrong with the internet today (Video). Vancouver: TED.
'
- 2007 establishments in South Korea
- Internet memes introduced in 2007
- 2007 YouTube videos
- 2017 controversies
- 2017 scandals
- Abortion in fiction
- Child abuse
- Child abuse in fiction
- Child welfare
- Copyright infringement
- Criticism of Google
- Fiction about death
- Entertainment scandals
- Fiction about murder
- Internet culture
- Internet memes introduced in 2017
- Kidnapping in fiction
- Mass psychogenic illness
- Obscenity controversies in animation
- Online obscenity controversies
- 2017 neologisms
- YouTube controversies
- Internet memes
- Internet memes introduced in the 2010s
- 2010s neologisms
- 2007 neologisms