Talk:Jvke: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Capitalization: Why allow the substitution then? |
→Capitalization: MOS:TM seems to support the universally-used JVKE over the WP-invented Jvke |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
From what I can tell, the moniker seems to be universally printed in all caps as ''JVKE''. Are there compelling reasons to ignore this yet maintain the ''v''? —[[Special:Contributions/151.132.206.250|151.132.206.250]] ([[User talk:151.132.206.250|talk]]) 15:28, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
From what I can tell, the moniker seems to be universally printed in all caps as ''JVKE''. Are there compelling reasons to ignore this yet maintain the ''v''? —[[Special:Contributions/151.132.206.250|151.132.206.250]] ([[User talk:151.132.206.250|talk]]) 15:28, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Wikipedia does not use stylizations such as all caps or all lower case, either for artists or for records. [[User:Richard3120|Richard3120]] ([[User talk:Richard3120|talk]]) 15:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
:Wikipedia does not use stylizations such as all caps or all lower case, either for artists or for records. [[User:Richard3120|Richard3120]] ([[User talk:Richard3120|talk]]) 15:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
::The substitution of ''A'' for ''V'' is a stylization, and one that only makes sense capitalized (''v'' does not by any stretch resemble an upside-down lowercase ''a''). Again I ask, are there any compelling reasons to retain that and insist on lowercase? —[[Special:Contributions/151.132.206.250|151.132.206.250]] ([[User talk:151.132.206.250|talk]]) 15:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
::The substitution of ''A'' for ''V'' is a stylization, and one that only makes sense capitalized (''v'' does not by any stretch resemble an upside-down lowercase ''a''). Again I ask, are there any compelling reasons to retain that and insist on lowercase? Edit: [[MOS:TM]] says to use standard capitalization rules {{tq|as long as this is a style already in widespread use, rather than inventing a new one.}} As far as I can tell, ''Jvke'' is a new style invented here. Please correct me if I’m mistaken. —[[Special:Contributions/151.132.206.250|151.132.206.250]] ([[User talk:151.132.206.250|talk]]) 15:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:58, 23 November 2022
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Pronounced Jake not Juke
JVKE task force
I have created a new task force for this article for everyone who has been improving and participating to give me some support and help me give this article more text, sources and other articles for his music
- Join link: Wikipedia:WikiProject JVKE or search it up
NYMan6 (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- I moved this to Wikipedia:WikiProject Internet culture/JVKE task force, but have to question whether this is really necessary as discussion on this talk page can cover this. Other editors may opt to redirect that to here. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Now I'm requesting MFD on it. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Internet culture/JVKE task force AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:46, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oh yes that page was a accidental mistake, I know the talk page is needed but there are some problems with this article, and I'm trying to build up a force to end it, There are many steps I added that will take time, that's why I made the page but it is not the JVKE task force it is Wikipedia:WikiProject JVKE.
- NYMan6 (talk) 13:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- I think this is definitely necessary for now NYMan6 (talk) 13:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Now I'm requesting MFD on it. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Internet culture/JVKE task force AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:46, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Stub
- I would like to know about the stub, as well as this article is way bigger than most stub articles on the Wikipedia site, and there are new sources appearing. NYMan6 (talk) 13:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- I've removed the stub tag because another editor just rated this page as start-class article. The size of a page isn't always the best criteria to measure development. This page is well underway towards what we would call B-class, but here's the thing: you have a (growing) number of sources and only a few meet the criteria of WP:Reliable sources. Some certainly do. The subject meets WP:Verifiability. The question remains: does the subject meet policies of WP:Biographies of living persons and WP:Notability? I am impressed with the work you've put into this so far, and since the page is new, I've been reluctant to interrupt your steady progress. I will ask you boldly, do you have some association with the subject? I can see other accounts have tried to create this page recently. BusterD (talk) 04:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'll tell you right now, I don't but I have been following his career closely. 2022 seems like the year, enough sources came in to make the article, I can see that other accounts have tried to make this, but were unsucessful.Yes, thank you very much, I actually am impressed myself, but I think this article was one that needed to enter. Thank you very much, Yes, this article is going towards B-Class which I'll say is amazing! Yes, I'll work on the sources. This morning I'll add more songs to the article, as well as probably some more text. He does meet Verifability, which is great! I find it not only impressing for me but for the people also working on this article, I love the amount of progress I've made, I don't mean to be recognized by the actual singer (JVKE) but I hope this article will be notable like other's
- Thank you
- NYMan6 (talk) 15:49, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I'll accept your answer in good faith. As opposed to adding more detail (again, it isn't the size of your article...) I'd focus on finding some really high quality sources, which will be available soon, based on the recent coverage. Perhaps there's some resonance on the recent television appearance. Talk shows often have fan pages or blogs which themselves would not be acceptable sources, but the chatter on which might lead you to these links. The standard is: significant coverage directly detailing the subject in multiple independent reliable sources. We need three or four to prevent the page from facing deletion process. I'm seeing Eggerton at Billboard, Zellner at Billboard, Renezeder at CelebSecrets, and Doby at The Hype as your best four. The last two aren't awesome, and while Billboard is money, all of these links are routine entertainment news and you are looking for diverse sources as well. The Mwenesi is cool but I wouldn't count that towards the minimum. It's arguable. Dougray at Cranston Herald is local coverage, and mostly interview so arguable, and not counting towards notability. Howabout this from Variety? This page indicates the Mwenesi was not an isolated incident, it's word for word. Broadway World is nice. Daily Illini is a college newspaper but a good one. Once you've anchored a page with RS, then you can use lesser sources like interviews to help detail.
- Remember, you are writing about a human being, not merely the image of a human being. You are wise to look at the BLP link I gave you above and read about the risks in covering a person without protecting them appropriately. Tread carefully. I'm going to mark this page as reviewed, but I'm trusting you to be careful and ask for help. Deal? BusterD (talk) 17:57, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- I've removed the stub tag because another editor just rated this page as start-class article. The size of a page isn't always the best criteria to measure development. This page is well underway towards what we would call B-class, but here's the thing: you have a (growing) number of sources and only a few meet the criteria of WP:Reliable sources. Some certainly do. The subject meets WP:Verifiability. The question remains: does the subject meet policies of WP:Biographies of living persons and WP:Notability? I am impressed with the work you've put into this so far, and since the page is new, I've been reluctant to interrupt your steady progress. I will ask you boldly, do you have some association with the subject? I can see other accounts have tried to create this page recently. BusterD (talk) 04:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- I would like to know about the stub, as well as this article is way bigger than most stub articles on the Wikipedia site, and there are new sources appearing. NYMan6 (talk) 13:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Capitalization
From what I can tell, the moniker seems to be universally printed in all caps as JVKE. Are there compelling reasons to ignore this yet maintain the v? —151.132.206.250 (talk) 15:28, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia does not use stylizations such as all caps or all lower case, either for artists or for records. Richard3120 (talk) 15:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- The substitution of A for V is a stylization, and one that only makes sense capitalized (v does not by any stretch resemble an upside-down lowercase a). Again I ask, are there any compelling reasons to retain that and insist on lowercase? Edit: MOS:TM says to use standard capitalization rules
as long as this is a style already in widespread use, rather than inventing a new one.
As far as I can tell, Jvke is a new style invented here. Please correct me if I’m mistaken. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 15:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- The substitution of A for V is a stylization, and one that only makes sense capitalized (v does not by any stretch resemble an upside-down lowercase a). Again I ask, are there any compelling reasons to retain that and insist on lowercase? Edit: MOS:TM says to use standard capitalization rules
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Low-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- Musicians work group articles needing discographies
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Pop music articles
- Low-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- Start-Class YouTube articles
- Low-importance YouTube articles
- WikiProject YouTube articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English