Talk:List of regicides: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m →Table |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I propose removing the current sections, inserting a single table for all the centuries. [[User:Grillofrances|Grillofrances]] ([[User talk:Grillofrances|talk]]) 04:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC) |
I propose removing the current sections, inserting a single table for all the centuries. [[User:Grillofrances|Grillofrances]] ([[User talk:Grillofrances|talk]]) 04:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Do you mean "all" or "each"? Because a single massive table would be awkward to navigate; better to have a separate table for each section. Additionally, "assassin" is only appropriate if the "type" is "assassination", so doesn't really work as a column title for every entry. It might be better to have only 1 location column, rather than both "country" and "place"; the list doesn't get that specific, and too many columns would stop the table fitting on 1 page. – [[User:Scyrme|Scyrme]] ([[User talk:Scyrme|talk]]) 09:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC) |
:Do you mean "all" or "each"? Because a single massive table would be awkward to navigate; better to have a separate table for each section. Additionally, "assassin" is only appropriate if the "type" is "assassination", so doesn't really work as a column title for every entry. "Perpetrator(s)" could work instead. It might be better to have only 1 location column, rather than both "country" and "place"; the list doesn't get that specific, and too many columns would stop the table fitting on 1 page. To be honest, I'm not sure what advantage a table would have over the current list. A table could be sorted, but I can't really see how sorting by columns other than "year" would be helpful. Lists are much easier to edit than tables and moving everything into a table would take a lot of work. – [[User:Scyrme|Scyrme]] ([[User talk:Scyrme|talk]]) 09:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:51, 5 December 2022
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Table
What do you think about creating a table with the following columns?
- year
- monarch
- country
- place
- type (coup, murder, execution, battle)
- assassin
- notes
I propose removing the current sections, inserting a single table for all the centuries. Grillofrances (talk) 04:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Do you mean "all" or "each"? Because a single massive table would be awkward to navigate; better to have a separate table for each section. Additionally, "assassin" is only appropriate if the "type" is "assassination", so doesn't really work as a column title for every entry. "Perpetrator(s)" could work instead. It might be better to have only 1 location column, rather than both "country" and "place"; the list doesn't get that specific, and too many columns would stop the table fitting on 1 page. To be honest, I'm not sure what advantage a table would have over the current list. A table could be sorted, but I can't really see how sorting by columns other than "year" would be helpful. Lists are much easier to edit than tables and moving everything into a table would take a lot of work. – Scyrme (talk) 09:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)