User talk:Hypotherical: Difference between revisions
→WP:ENGVAR: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Hypotherical (talk | contribs) →WP:ENGVAR: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
I hope this helps, and happy editing!—[[User:Ineffablebookkeeper|Ineffablebookkeeper]] ([[User talk:Ineffablebookkeeper|talk]]) ({{[[Template:ping|ping]]}} me!) 12:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC) |
I hope this helps, and happy editing!—[[User:Ineffablebookkeeper|Ineffablebookkeeper]] ([[User talk:Ineffablebookkeeper|talk]]) ({{[[Template:ping|ping]]}} me!) 12:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
:[[User:Ineffablebookkeeper|@Ineffablebookkeeper]] Alright, I'll be sure to know. [[User:Hypotherical|Hypotherical]] ([[User talk:Hypotherical#top|talk]]) 12:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:42, 6 December 2022
Welcome!
[edit]
|
December 2022
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Children's Miracle Network Hospitals has been reverted.
Your edit here to Children's Miracle Network Hospitals was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/c/dingercity) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
WP:ENGVAR
[edit]Hi – I apologise for having to revert a lot of your edits, but I have to inform you of Wikipedia's policy on English varieties.
Whatever variety of English is in use on an article (such as British English or American English), it generally shouldn't be changed, unless there is a very good reason for it – such as the subject matter being about something American, for instance.
English varieties and their use on Wikipedia can get contentious at times, so to avoid edit warring, Wikipedia's WP:ENGVAR policy must be respected. No one variety of English is considered to be "bad grammar" on Wikipedia, so varieties aren't changed for that reason.
It is true that an article can have an unclear English style, and sometimes editors will unify its English style based on if it's relevant to the article's subject matter and if one variety is more commonly represented in the article than another. Nevertheless – it's best to leave well-established English varieties on an article alone.
I hope this helps, and happy editing!—Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 12:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Ineffablebookkeeper Alright, I'll be sure to know. Hypotherical (talk) 12:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)