Jump to content

Talk:Ghostery: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Newb787 (talk | contribs)
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 17: Line 17:
== Unsubstantiated severe claim in criticism section since at least 2015 ==
== Unsubstantiated severe claim in criticism section since at least 2015 ==


False accusations never proven have been removed. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Newb787|Newb787]] ([[User talk:Newb787#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Newb787|contribs]]) 06:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
False accusations never proven have been removed.


This was brought up already in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ghostery/Archives/2015#Criticism_Section and
This was brought up already in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ghostery/Archives/2015#Criticism_Section and

Revision as of 06:57, 8 December 2022

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ghostery Lite

For the current version of Safari, they make available only Ghostery Lite. We should have an entry on this. On what is missing. It still claims to offer "comprehensive privacy protection". -IP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8381:99C0:8071:38EE:1DF5:DAFA (talk) 18:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsubstantiated severe claim in criticism section since at least 2015

False accusations never proven have been removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newb787 (talkcontribs) 06:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was brought up already in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ghostery/Archives/2015#Criticism_Section and still applies.

In the Criticism section, one sentence reads: "GhostRank [...] sent that information back to advertisers so they could better formulate their ads to avoid being blocked.[20]" (Emphasis mine.)

The first part is as far as I know uncontested, the second has been contradicted by the makers many, many times, is not further qualified, explained or supported in any way in the referenced article and is basically unsubstantiated conjecture.

(I am not affiliated with the company or the extension and haven't used it in years because I don't need it and am uncomfortable with their affiliations, even if I personally don't think they're immoral.)

--2003:C9:4711:4B00:A0D9:D261:9830:FF1B (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]