Talk:List of Linux distributions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:05, 13 December 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Linux distributions article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 4 months

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Linux High‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Katy Waldman (11 October 2013). "Wikipedia Editing Party at Brown University! Woohoo!". Slate (magazine). Archived from the original on 13 October 2013. Retrieved 13 October 2013. Topic bias means that issues of concern to geek dudes (such as Linux distributions) are rated as important, while issues women might find compelling (the design of Kate Middleton's wedding dress, say) are deemed trivial and flagged for deletion.

Chinese distribution

Where is the Chinese backed distribution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceros (talk • contribs) 29 okt 2006 04:48‎ (UTC)

Wikipedia Malware bot detected

Some editor keeps deleting my distro "automatically" from a bot page. Unfair competition detected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MrOllie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aoidh

I am not signed in becuase like TWITTER, Wikipedia keeps deleting the truth using malware bots.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:143:480:A4C0:4ECC:6AFF:FE8E:47D (talk) 21:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hat

How come Red Hat is not here but Fedora is here? I would add some of th info, but I can't enter the tech info so I'm not spoiling other people's good work...

It's just a list - most of the "tech info" here is propagandist (--------) that should be replaced by hard facts with Comparison of Linux distributions anyways. Therefore, just add it yourself. ¦ Reisio 09:44, 2005 August 18 (UTC)

It's mentioned there. Look above commercial distributions. Jaalto 2005-11-24

(REDHAT is pay only, non-GNU, I would dare to say they are no longer a Linux Distro as a (wiki) dictionary defines it.)

Discontinued, now for sale

monomaxos.com was formerly a porn site, now for sale. This Ubuntu flavour is discontinued. Please remove link. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.62.243 (talk • contribs) 22 feb 2020 02:00 (UTC)

is linux monolithic ?

linux is not monolithic it's modular it was one of the first popular modular kernels; which can be micro if the user desires. mach uses different file structs to talk to its parts and is written by different people - is it definitely different but not by much if talking about modularity alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.219.207.23 (talk • contribs) 4 apr 2016 14:43 (UTC)

Ubuntu touch: discontiued?

Since when is Ubuntu Touch discontinued? Neither their website nor the wikipedia article for it seem to indicate a discontinuation of said distro.

EDIT: While it does seem that Ubuntu Touch has seen its support terminated by Canonical Group, UBports is still (actively?) working on it 2001:861:3285:7E00:8F34:79F5:E70B:7ED5 (talk) 13:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 * It's mentioned there. Look above commercial distributions.  [[User:Jaalto|Jaalto]] 2005-11-24
+(REDHAT is pay only, non-GNU, I would dare to say they are no longer a Linux Distro as a (wiki) dictionary defines it.)
 == Discontinued, now for sale ==