Talk:Chinese Americans in the Mississippi Delta: Difference between revisions
rating |
→Subject group description needs clarification: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Tone, neutrality, and sources ==== |
==== Tone, neutrality, and sources ==== |
||
The tone of this article is deeply problematic. The article raises many good points, but they are not articulated properly, and the statements are not supported by sources. In particular, I feel compelled to delete the entire "Inter-ethnic Relations" section because the terms "half-breed, "Chinese Negro," and "Chinese purity" are highly offensive. What the deleted section says is more or less true, but the terminology is not appropriate and does not reflect the language of the source literature on the topic. The deleted section also seems argumentative, and I don't think it belongs in an encyclopedia article. The previous "Ethnic Identity" section is enough for explaining the racial situation in the Delta. [[User:Winstonho0805|Winston Ho 何嶸]] ([[User talk:Winstonho0805|talk]]) 00:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC) |
The tone of this article is deeply problematic. The article raises many good points, but they are not articulated properly, and the statements are not supported by sources. In particular, I feel compelled to delete the entire "Inter-ethnic Relations" section because the terms "half-breed, "Chinese Negro," and "Chinese purity" are highly offensive. What the deleted section says is more or less true, but the terminology is not appropriate and does not reflect the language of the source literature on the topic. The deleted section also seems argumentative, and I don't think it belongs in an encyclopedia article. The previous "Ethnic Identity" section is enough for explaining the racial situation in the Delta. [[User:Winstonho0805|Winston Ho 何嶸]] ([[User talk:Winstonho0805|talk]]) 00:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Subject group description needs clarification == |
|||
"All of them were single and married men who worked in Mississippi" is confusing. Either "single and married" must be removed as unnecessary, or the citation source must be consulted to rule out the remote potential that the subject group was entirely comprised of single women who married Mississippians. In either case, the quest for accuracy dictates consultation of the source to determine whether, in fact, the subject group contained couples or families at the outset. [[User:Jetpower|Jetpower]] ([[User talk:Jetpower|talk]]) 14:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:08, 14 December 2022
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Tone, neutrality, and sources
The tone of this article is deeply problematic. The article raises many good points, but they are not articulated properly, and the statements are not supported by sources. In particular, I feel compelled to delete the entire "Inter-ethnic Relations" section because the terms "half-breed, "Chinese Negro," and "Chinese purity" are highly offensive. What the deleted section says is more or less true, but the terminology is not appropriate and does not reflect the language of the source literature on the topic. The deleted section also seems argumentative, and I don't think it belongs in an encyclopedia article. The previous "Ethnic Identity" section is enough for explaining the racial situation in the Delta. Winston Ho 何嶸 (talk) 00:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Subject group description needs clarification
"All of them were single and married men who worked in Mississippi" is confusing. Either "single and married" must be removed as unnecessary, or the citation source must be consulted to rule out the remote potential that the subject group was entirely comprised of single women who married Mississippians. In either case, the quest for accuracy dictates consultation of the source to determine whether, in fact, the subject group contained couples or families at the outset. Jetpower (talk) 14:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Unknown-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Start-Class Asian Americans articles
- Unknown-importance Asian Americans articles
- WikiProject Asian Americans articles
- Start-Class Mississippi articles
- Unknown-importance Mississippi articles
- WikiProject Mississippi articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Unknown-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject China articles