Jump to content

Talk:Megaherbivore: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Placing Articles for creation banner, adding 1 WikiProject banner, removing 1 WikiProject banner (AFCH 0.9.1)
class
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=|ts=20221226211533|reviewer=UtherSRG|oldid=1129727084}}
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=|ts=20221226211533|reviewer=UtherSRG|oldid=1129727084}}
{{WikiProject Mammals|class=}}
{{WikiProject Mammals|class=start}}


{{WikiProject Animals}}
==Aiming to improve the article==
==Aiming to improve the article==



Revision as of 22:43, 26 December 2022

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 26 December 2022 by reviewer UtherSRG (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconMammals Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aiming to improve the article

Let's talk about what to add, fix or improve about this page. 20 upper (talk) 23:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should ensure whatever you have here is in alignment with what's at Megafauna. For instance, that the category isn't locked at being 1000kg and larger, but rather a lower weight of as low as 46 kg. Keep consistencies like this in mind as you gather your information and do your writing. Also, that article is a great source of reference material as well. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This draft is in perfect alignment with the article Megafauna. In that article they said an animal that is 46 kg or more is considered to be a Megafauna not a Megaherbivore. Megaherbivores are a very large type of Megafauna and the largest herbivores on Earth. 20 upper (talk) 04:08, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what it says. While megaherbivores are a type of megafauna, it is just a subgroup based on diet, not based on size. UtherSRG (talk) 16:56, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]