User talk:Snowolf: Difference between revisions
Mediation |
No edit summary |
||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
It seems that after the edit war, one user was blocked for two days and then we could continue discussing again normally without wars, so it seems maybe we don't need a mediator anymore (however, presumably we will need it again... :-( ). Thank you, --[[:ca:Usuari:Xtv|Xtv]] - ([[User talk:Xtv|my talk]]) - ([[:ca:Usuari Discussió:Xtv|que dius que què?]]) 05:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC) |
It seems that after the edit war, one user was blocked for two days and then we could continue discussing again normally without wars, so it seems maybe we don't need a mediator anymore (however, presumably we will need it again... :-( ). Thank you, --[[:ca:Usuari:Xtv|Xtv]] - ([[User talk:Xtv|my talk]]) - ([[:ca:Usuari Discussió:Xtv|que dius que què?]]) 05:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
That would be great! Where do we begin? |
Revision as of 05:26, 6 March 2007
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but your signature is exceedingly long in wikimarkup and I found it very disruptive following a diff because of it. Please can you try and reduce the overhead somehow? --Spartaz Humbug! 20:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for the revert and the counter update :-) --Rettetast 23:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Snowbot
Any chance you can tell Snowbot to clear out some user cats I deleted? That's a lot easier than going on AWB and removing the members :) VegaDark 02:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, I've just been unblocked so I can tell my bot to deal with that. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 13:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a ton...and WTF, you were blocked? Glad to see that is resolved now. If you could have your bot check for empty user cats like this once or twice a week that would be great, I'll make sure to first remove the cats from any templates I see though. VegaDark 20:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Entrusted with the Bucket!
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA. Thanks for your vote, I've received an overwhelming 96% support and successfully took a copy of bucket-and-mop from the main office!
School graduation exam and HKCEE are both pressing in, so I might become inactive for a while. But soon after that, I look forward to working with you! --Deryck C. 03:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Your comment on User Talk:Essjay
Hi! I'm sure your recent "worthless contributions" barnstar to Essjay's talk page was well meant, but it struck me as very inappropriate. Would you please reconsider placing it there? Thanks, William Pietri 08:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think you meant 'countless' and mistyped? Might be worth heading back to clarify. All the best, Ben Aveling 09:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ben is totally right. I'm really sorry for the mess. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 12:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've been blocked by Pschemp (one month), but now I've been unblocked by other admins. I've just removed both my unblock requests, but in the history you can find what I had to say on this matter. I wanted to support him in this moment, not to bite him ;-). I think that it should be AGF another time :-(. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 13:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode!
This is a special episode we recored specifically dealing w/ the whole Essjay/Ryan Jordan situation. We recorded this before Jimbo's second comment, so it might be a little dated but still a good listen.
As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 08:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
snowbot
just a heads up, but your bot seems to have renamed Category:Women's Colleges that are Coeducational to simply [[Category:]] when it was supposed to be changed to Category:Former women's universities and colleges in the United States that became coeducational. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Keatinga (talk • contribs) 20:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks!!
Thanks so much for the barnstar, its my second so far even though I've been here since December (had my account since May '06). Again, thank you and I'm going to move it to the barnstar section of my Userpage (if you don't mind!!) Anyway Thanks and happy editing!!!Tellyaddict 11:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Of course move it ;-). Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 11:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thanks
Nice delete key, that. I'll try to collect the Alt and Ctl keys as well.--Mike Selinker 14:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!!!
Thanks for saying you would support me in any future RFAs, you see the thing is my failed RFA was only two months back so I'd like to leave it for 1-2 months, your comment is greatly appreciated and if you would like to nominate me in the future months I would be overjoyed, thanks again and happy editing.Tellyaddict 17:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Gosh, people have been so nice to me in the past few days. I'm humbled. Thank you. Xiner (talk, email) 01:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Is there a way to say "I Think This User Is a Sockpuppet But I Don't Know Whose"? That is what I would rather have done. I was kind of freaked out when they asked me to email them privately (because it seemed like they created the account to ask me to do so). And then when they started barking about the Army manual that scared me. I don't want some curette-wielding Marine showing up at my house. Any ideas? Joie de Vivre 23:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I created Xiner's RFA, so you can create a co-nom. Oh, yeah, that reminds me, could you provide a link to Xiner's former RFA in your nom. It slipped my mind. bibliomaniac15 02:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wait! Sorry I wasn't referring to Snowolf, whose offer I have to regrettably decline. I've already had one from a while back, you see. Sorry! I hope you'll still offer your thoughts on it, though. Xiner (talk, email) 02:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Mediation
It seems that after the edit war, one user was blocked for two days and then we could continue discussing again normally without wars, so it seems maybe we don't need a mediator anymore (however, presumably we will need it again... :-( ). Thank you, --Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 05:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
That would be great! Where do we begin?