Talk:Asteroid impact avoidance: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:23, 28 December 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asteroid impact avoidance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Solar System

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of January 22, 2006.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Asteroid impact avoidance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could mention HAMMER

[1], kinetic and nuclear options. - Rod57 (talk) 01:13, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Asteroid impact prediction

The Asteroid impact prediction article has just moved from Draft to the main article space. Reviewers suggested that I should add some of the text from the Asteroid impact prediction article to this one (I have linked the Asteroid impact prediction article to this one already). Looking at the avoidance article it seems that it already contains some text on impact prediction, but is not currently identified as such. I.e. the avoidance article does not currently differentiate between the two separate stages of 1. predicting an impact, followed by 2. taking action to prevent the impact from happening.

I can see from comments in the avoidance article that there are some issues with the existing prediction text in that it is now quite out of date. Conveniently the new prediction article is lacking information on the history of impact prediction and could do with some of the text currently in the avoidance article. Can I suggest that we separate out the prediction text in the avoidance article to make it clear it is about prediction (adding a main article link), and then the bulk of the avoidance article can focus on the actual avoidance, which is a separate topic? Correspondingly an "Aftermath" section can be added to the prediction article detailing the options in the event of a predicted impact, which depending on the severity will include avoidance. Rafflesgluft (talk) 14:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a couple of months, and no objections or comments during that time, so I soon plan to start 1. copying the asteroid impact prediction text into the Asteroid impact prediction article, and then 2. removing it from this article, with an ultimate aim to leave this article focused on impact avoidance and the prediction article on prediction. Any last minute comments or objections, please shout up, otherwise I will go ahead under the assumption any interested parties are in agreement. Thanks Rafflesgluft (talk) 11:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's now three months so I have begun work:

copied Impact probability calculation pattern Rafflesgluft (talk) 17:28, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
copied (and edited) history and deep impact Rafflesgluft (talk) 19:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 PDC

Anything about 2019 PDC, which was part of a NASA simulation? --136.8.33.70 (talk) 10:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's just the latest of a biennial tabletop simulation series by IAA with minor NASA support, of which Talk:2013 PDC-E seems to be the first. So, one article for the whole series ought to be enough. Jim.henderson (talk) 22:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Asteroid impact avoidance in solar system

This article currently focuses a lot on avoiding asteroid impact on earth. However, avoiding asteroid impact on other planets in the solar system seems just as important. The idea is that if another planet is hit by a large enough asteroid to pull it out of orbit, those altered pull/repel forces of those planets may also alter the orbit of the earth, as it is kept in balance by their pull/repel forces. Chance of that happening seems way higher then just the chance of the earth itself being hit by a (large) asteroid.

Can the article mention this ?

Also, are there any plans on setting up "asteroid detection stations" at the moon or other planets to increase time between warning and actual impact (assuming such an event would actually happen within the next few hundred years or so).

Another thing I'm thinking of is that the creation of a lunar base could (in the future) also help in improving the capability of deflecting asteroids which could potentially impact earth or other nearby planets in the solar system, as the launch of missiles or crafts that can alter the asteroid trajectory will be easier (and they may get much more kinetic energy, due to absence air resistance at launch). --Genetics4good (talk) 17:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any asteroid large enough to notably change a planet's orbit would already be discovered. Asteroid impacts on other planets are basically academic and not a concern so NASA does not really have a public list. There is almost a zero chance of Earth being hit by any asteroid larger than 1 km in the next 100 years. Setting up a satellite closer to the Sun would help detect asteroid's interior to Earth's orbit such as the Atira asteroids. -- Kheider (talk) 23:57, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

a 1-km asteroid is huge, so that's not saying very much. A 500-m asteroid hit would be catastrophic. Certainly, the idea of another planet being hit by an asteroid big enough to perturb it sufficiently to affect the earth's orbit is pretty absurd. There are far more important things for Genetics4good to worry about.

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 :Any asteroid large enough to notably change a planet's orbit would already be discovered. Asteroid impacts on other planets are basically academic and not a concern so NASA does not really have a public list. There is almost a zero chance of Earth being hit by any asteroid larger than 1 km in the next 100 years. Setting up a satellite closer to the Sun would help detect asteroid's interior to Earth's orbit such as the [[Atira asteroid]]s. -- [[User:Kheider|Kheider]] ([[User talk:Kheider|talk]]) 23:57, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 :: a 1-km asteroid is huge, so that's not saying very much. A 500-m asteroid hit would be catastrophic. Certainly, the idea of another planet being hit by an asteroid big enough to perturb it sufficiently to affect the earth's orbit is pretty absurd. There are far more important things for Genetics4good to worry about.
-== Box office bomb ==
-"The popularity of the 2021 movie Don't Look Up helped to raise awareness of the possibility of avoiding NEOs." – the film seems to have been a box office bomb according to Wikipedia. I don't know anyone who's seen it either! Even the Sean Connery vehicle "Meteor" in the seventies seems to have made more money, and features the use of orbiting nuclear missiles being used to fend off an asteroid. -[[Special:Contributions/2A01:4C8:1428:E03C:C0EF:D58C:5267:3C0B|2A01:4C8:1428:E03C:C0EF:D58C:5267:3C0B]] ([[User talk:2A01:4C8:1428:E03C:C0EF:D58C:5267:3C0B|talk]]) 12:06, 28 December 2022 (UTC)