Jump to content

User talk:FMSky: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1133042491 by ThatOneFilipinoGuy (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted
m Undid revision 1133042543 by FMSky (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 104: Line 104:
   ''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
   ''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> <span style="color: blue">—</span> [[User:Moops|<span style="color: green ">Moops</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠[[User talk:Moops|<span style="color: indigo">'''T'''</span>]]⋡</span></sup> 02:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> <span style="color: blue">—</span> [[User:Moops|<span style="color: green ">Moops</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">⋠[[User talk:Moops|<span style="color: indigo">'''T'''</span>]]⋡</span></sup> 02:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

== January 2023 ==

{{uw-unsourced2|Bibi Bourelly}} [[User:ThatOneFilipinoGuy|ThatOneFilipinoGuy]] ([[User talk:ThatOneFilipinoGuy|talk]]) 00:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:10, 12 January 2023

It doesn't make sense

It doesn't make sense, because according to this reasoning on every page the captions should end with a period, very few captions are fragmented sentences. I don't understand. I made a lot of changes changing the captions. At this point you should carefully check all captions on all pages I've edited, and not just my own edits. JackkBrown (talk) 10:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:CAPFRAGS is pretty clear though... If you're not sure just dont edit captions i guess --FMSky (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@FMSky: That's why it would be correct for you to check all the pages I edited and not just my edits on these pages, because surely other sentences need the end point. Reverting only my changes (which are not all errors, so don't use rollback), the page would still contain misses. JackkBrown (talk) 10:38, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll maybe do that later, but in the meantime pls only edit captions when you're 100% sure --FMSky (talk) 10:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
also this: "This page is full of captions that, in your opinion, need the point. Either we change all the captions, or we proceed to leave the dots only when the caption has more sentence" https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Stan_Laurel&diff=prev&oldid=1128096565 is complete nonsense and not how it works. Just because one caption has a full stop at the end of it doesnt mean EVERY picture needs to have one and vice versa --FMSky (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@FMSky: Thank you very much. A few times I corrected obvious errors; I didn't just edit captions all the time. I am staying put, when you had checked everything, I will only proceed if I am 100% sure; at the moment I'm staying put. JackkBrown (talk) 10:53, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes i know, and i didnt revert any of your other edits, just the misplaced periods --FMSky (talk) 10:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've been wrong in the past and wouldn't know how to correct. In order to avoid correcting wrongly, I rely on your experience. Without pressure, I await a review of all my changes from you. I avoid making new edits so you can take your time. Thanks. Have a nice day. JackkBrown (talk) 16:00, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can still contribute lol, your other edits were productive. --07:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
That's not entirely true; for example, my edits on "Gandhi", "Eminem" and "Madonna" don't seem to me to be correct. JackkBrown (talk) 13:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway you're really good. I have seen your contributions, you are an excellent resource, really well done. JackkBrown (talk) 13:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected my mistake on "Eminem" and a glaring error on "Gandhi". Please check my other edit (not sure if it's correct) on "Gandhi" and all my past edits on "Madonna". Thank you very much. JackkBrown (talk) 14:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JackkBrown: as requested i went through the rest of your edits and corrected the ones that were wrong (wasnt that many). should be ok now --FMSky (talk) 03:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. I'm dubious here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1127765987; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madonna; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Democratic_Party_(Italy)_leadership_election. JackkBrown (talk) 04:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote my message too early and overlooked your newest edits. I've corrected them now, that should be all --FMSky (talk) 04:33, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Only this remains: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Democratic_Party_(Italy)_leadership_election. From now on I will edit captions only after carefully reading the caption guidelines. JackkBrown (talk) 04:44, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
done 👍--FMSky (talk) 05:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_hall; https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groves_family. It may be okay, but it could also be that something is not right. Sorry for "clogging up" your talk. 😅 — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackkBrown (talkcontribs) 05:10, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
These are both fine, they were correctly removed -- FMSky (talk) 05:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1127789523. I think that's a complete sentence. JackkBrown (talk) 06:32, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
yes but this pic isnt even in the article anymore-- FMSky (talk) 06:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

>>> This is not to check my past contributions, but to take a peek at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk, because it's constantly being edited and, for example, all the captions do not have a period, which is strange; I consider you a very experienced user, and I can't touch such a sensitive page without being 1000% sure. I won't "bother" you anymore. 😅 JackkBrown (talk) 07:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

nah its fine, and i now added the full stops wherer its needed. i think i initally missed that article --FMSky (talk) 07:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Euro_1992_Final and this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Keating. The past changes are (finally) finished! JackkBrown (talk) 08:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

they are both fine, i already looked over them ;) --FMSky (talk) 08:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The match was played at the Ullevi (pictured in 2006) in Gothenburg" is a complete sentence, if I'm not mistaken. JackkBrown (talk) 09:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

indeed, fixed now --FMSky (talk) 09:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only this remains: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Euro_2004_Final; "The Greece team celebrate their win". JackkBrown (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

done --15:33, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

"The Greece team celebrate their win" is a complete sentence, if I'm not mistaken. Anyway it's really finished now. Thanks for everything 👍🏻. JackkBrown (talk) 15:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to understand if I have learned. It's not a check. Changes on Mbappé: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1128546248; https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1128680720. JackkBrown (talk) 11:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
both correct 👍 --FMSky (talk) 12:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have a doubt here. I don't want to make mistakes. I also want to make sure I really learned: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1129090392 JackkBrown (talk) 14:46, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
was correct, its not a full sentence --FMSky (talk) 16:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You could remove the links (overlinks) here: Musk discussing a Neuralink device during a live demonstration in 2020, and here: Musk before a Model X at the 2014 Tesla Inc. annual shareholder meeting? These are two captions. Elon Musk (there's total protection). JackkBrown (talk) 18:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Its better to keep those in imo, Model X and Neuralink arent easily understood so the links are helpful --FMSky (talk) 20:45, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But in the text (I'm not talking about the caption) there's a link to the same word, so, for example, Neuralink is present both in the caption and in the text, about 2 lines apart. JackkBrown (talk) 22:59, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Its still helpful to have them in captions imo, cause that's where people look first most of the time --FMSky (talk) 10:47, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Finally I get it. The edits on "Dani Alves" should be perfect, I'm 99.9% sure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dani_Alves. JackkBrown (talk) 15:29, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
yes they're correct, i think you've figured it out ;)=--FMSky (talk) 20:06, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm insecure about the captions here. Could you check the whole page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volodymyr_Zelenskyy# — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackkBrown (talk) 23:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

i've checked it, should be ok now --FMSky (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm undecided here, especially in the second caption: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Candreva. JackkBrown (talk) 12:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

should be ok now --FMSky (talk) 02:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here too I'm dubious: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillermo_Ochoa. I take this opportunity to wish you a happy new year; a big 2023 to you and en.wiki! JackkBrown (talk) 17:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks man, same to you! i checked the article and corrected the 2 captions --FMSky (talk) 13:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I corrected the captions in "LeBron James", but here I have strong doubts: "James posterizing former Cleveland teammate Kevin Love in a game against the Cavaliers on March 21, 2022." JackkBrown (talk) 15:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JackkBrown, I'm not FMSky but I'll reply anyway. That caption should not have a full stop. It lacks a real verb. It would need a full stop if the sentence read "James is posterizing […]", "James was posterizing […]", "James posterizes […]" etc. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 16:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Robby.is.on: Thanks a lot, I'll fix that caption too. JackkBrown (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Classical Education

Hello there!

Due to your edits to the page on classical education, I was wondering if you yourself are classically educated. If so, you would be the only Wikipedia user I know who is classicaly educated (other than me).

Justyouraveragelechuga my talk page 21:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, now i'm not, that was just a drive-by edit by me to do some basic formatting etc that i do to a lot of pages --FMSky (talk) 03:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About user Progrock70s

This guy... there's a good chance he edited on Thin Lizzy 1971 album page and other pages using IPs (from Iran) like 151.246.120.235. On 25/12 at 7:52 he was blocked by Materialscientist, the block lasted 31 hours, then the block ended 26/12 at 14:52, during the time he was blocked, some iran IPs continued to edit like him. I'm not lying about that and I'm not lying about his block and you can see that. One more thing, this IP 151.246.120.235 is blocked, it was blocked on 26/12. With all that I said, if he really used IPs while blocked to continue editing on that page, could he be blocked for not respecting the block time? 2804:1054:4010:70A0:B54B:3837:1EEB:6D28 (talk) 08:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for your recent edit on Darwin Núñez 😅

I’ve replaced the source. Now the only thing out of date is the World Cup 2022. Scientelensia (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yeah but its still wrong, nunez is a lot of things but surely not known for his technical abilities --FMSky (talk) 21:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would disagree, Nunez really knows how to volley a ball (think Uruguay vs Norway game) and has great dribbling and potential. Admittedly his first touch isn’t amazing but he can do skills such as stepovers Scientelensia (talk) 21:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend, Pele was regarded as GOAT by Fifa. The link taken to the fifa website was deleted. Don't you think he didn't regard as GOAT anymore by Fifa? I think it will be biased for footballers to call them Goat by Fifa. Understanding this, they may deleted that post completely. Thus. Though they deleted from their site, in web archive it will remain forever.

So, shouldn't you delete that line quoted "Regarded as one of the greatest players of all time and labelled "the greatest" by FIFA," in Pelé???? HridoyKundu (talk) 10:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

actually you might be right.. i didnt realize that the original article is down, so it does indeed seem like fifa doesnt consider him the greatest anymore. it should probably be discussed on the talk page though --FMSky (talk) 10:04, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, FMSky!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 20:51, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --FMSky (talk) 02:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, FMSky!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Moops T 02:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bibi Bourelly, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ThatOneFilipinoGuy (talk) 00:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]