Jump to content

Talk:Post-bop: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Goffman82 (talk | contribs)
upgrade
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Jazz|class=Start|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Jazz|class=C|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Music/Music genres task force|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Music/Music genres task force|class=C}}


== History and chronology ==
== History and chronology ==

Revision as of 15:29, 13 January 2023

WikiProject iconJazz C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMusic/Music genres task force C‑class
WikiProject iconPost-bop is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

History and chronology

The first paragraph says post-bob emerged in the early to mid 1960s. Later, the article says late 1950s. History section says it originated with Miles's ESP in 1964. All slightly contradictory chronologies - but which is correct? At very least, the history section needs expansion to justify the earlier dates claimed by the other sections. Goffman82 04:05, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Goffman82 Yes it was a tangle, but this is a thorny topic. I have done my best to thoroughly source the article and present the many conflicting uses of the term in a logical way. Best.4meter4 (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article is looking great. Thank you for your extensive improvements. Goffman82 23:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]