User talk:SparrowsWing: Difference between revisions
HagermanBot (talk | contribs) m WHOACRINK didn't sign: "→Concerns About Crink: " |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<hr> |
<hr> |
||
== Concerns About Crink 3 == |
|||
Well, Sparrow, I was very disappointed when I noticed that my source of information on "Crink" had been deleted. I'm sorry for any inconveniences that I have caused you but as Mao Zedong once said, "A Revolution is no tea party." As I continue to fight for my rights to publish this article on "Crink" on your page, you shall hear from me. I intend to express my thoughts on your actions. Once again allow "Crink" to be published on WikiPedia. It is a great source of information. It is a pity that you cannot see this. I look forward to hearing from you soon. |
|||
Sincerely, |
|||
One of the Major Pioneers of the Word "Crink" |
|||
Line 23: | Line 31: | ||
Sincerely, |
Sincerely, |
||
One of the Major Pioneers of the word "Crink" <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:WHOACRINK|WHOACRINK]] ([[User talk:WHOACRINK|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/WHOACRINK|contribs]]) 02:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
One of the Major Pioneers of the word "Crink" <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:WHOACRINK|WHOACRINK]] ([[User talk:WHOACRINK|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/WHOACRINK|contribs]]) 02:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
||
== Concerns About Crink == |
== Concerns About Crink == |
Revision as of 02:21, 8 March 2007
Welcome!
Hello, SparrowsWing, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- nae'blis 22:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your welcome - I hope to be a good contributer. SparrowsWing 22:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- You're welcome for the welcome - also, not to detract from your efforts here, but you may find an outlet for your Wheel of Time information at A Wheel of Time Wiki, if you ever get bored here. *grin*. -- nae'blis 22:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your welcome - I hope to be a good contributer. SparrowsWing 22:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Previous comments archived to User talk:SparrowsWing/Archive1
Concerns About Crink 3
Well, Sparrow, I was very disappointed when I noticed that my source of information on "Crink" had been deleted. I'm sorry for any inconveniences that I have caused you but as Mao Zedong once said, "A Revolution is no tea party." As I continue to fight for my rights to publish this article on "Crink" on your page, you shall hear from me. I intend to express my thoughts on your actions. Once again allow "Crink" to be published on WikiPedia. It is a great source of information. It is a pity that you cannot see this. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely, One of the Major Pioneers of the Word "Crink"
Concerns About Crink Cont'd
Greetings, Sparrow. I received your message, and yet after presenting my argument in a very diplomatic way, I still see that my page on "Crink" is still a candidate to be deleted by your administrators. May I remind you that the "Crink" article is a very exclusive source of information? Or must I resort to informing you that your threat to delete my "Crink" article is in direct violation of Amendment I (Freedom of Religious, Press, Expression, etc.)of the U.S. Constitution? This Amendment states that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, pr the right of the people peaceably to assembly, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievance." I know what you may be thinking. But this Amendment does not pertain to this site. Well, Sparrow, this Amendment does, in fact, pertain to this site. By not allowing me to express my ideas on "Crink", you are altering my rights. No where in the Constitution does it state that you have the ability to change the rights bestowed upon me by the Founding Fathers of this country. "Give to every human being every right that you claim for yourself." This was said by Robert Ingersoll, Sparrow. Study this quote well, my friend, for I'm sure you'd be demanding the same rights that I, creator of the "Crink" article, am demanding right now if you were in my unfortunate position. Sadly, I'm already granted these rights, yet as I try to express my thoughts and educate the world, I find myself bound in iron chains on this site. Your myriad of rules and regulations violate my rights and I will not stand for such injustice. I look forward to hearing from you soon and I truly hope that you will think well before you make the final decision.
Sincerely, One of the Major Pioneers of the word "Crink" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WHOACRINK (talk • contribs) 02:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC).
Concerns About Crink
Hello. It has come to my attention that you have speedily deleted my Crink page. I have many concerns regarding your decision. I would like you to know that Crink is a fast growing word, used in many states in the United States and in Great Britain. There are those who may wish to learn about Crink and will need to access this page. Picture this. You're at lunch and you spill a bowl of spaghetti on your nice shirt. Your friend laughs at you and calls you a Crink. What do you do? I know I would go home and see what the word meant by going on my favorite information-providing site, WikiPedia. I hope you seriously consider my position on this problem and I hope to hear from you soon. Once again, I beg you reconsider your decision to delete such a valuable page on WikiPedia as the Crink page.
Sincerely, One of the Major Pioneers of the word "Crink"
Hello
Hi Sparrow. I was just looking at your Evolution vs. Creationism page. I think it's really cool that you started something like that. It appears things have died down for a few days now, but if things get heated again, I'll gladly jump in and help support you. I'm a long time anti-evolutionist/mega-creationist. I know what it feels like to have lots of editors opposing you at once, as you'll see on my talk page. I'll be watching your Evolution vs. Creationism, if you don't mind, and I think it's a cool thing you're doing with that page. =)Christknight 22:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry
Whoops! I thought the infobox colors were for asthetic reasons. I didn't know they were color code. TNTfan101 01:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
HASHAHAHAHAH
it was funny!Planb11 01:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Well think of it this way
Everyone on the internet has seen that picture of the Ugly Girl face. Why not put it up there? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Planb11 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC).
The discussion at talk:Face was intended to instigate a response and attempt to insert patently idiotic content to Wikipedia, please do not feed the troll. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. It was very nice of you to attempt to reason with him, but I'm afraid that any such attempts are wasted on this user. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not discuss this user without first gaining permission from him. Planb11 03:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
You are right. Bears are not "Godless Killing Machines"
Thanks for catching the "Bear" additions, my rebellious daughter created on my machine. She was having a bit of fun without knowing the value wikipedia has for all of us. I have discussed this "fun" with her and took your lead and directed her to the appropriate commenting sections.
Cathleen
- Cool, no worries.SparrowsWing (talk) 03:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Christianity (Nicene Creed)
I noticed you took part in the straw poll. Please visit the talk page to engage in the discussion, so we may build consensus. Vassyana 00:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Wrong template
The nn-warn template you added to speedy delete an article was the wrong one.. that one is used to warn a contributor that their article is up for deletion... it goes on a user talk page. The right one to use is {{db-bio}}, which uses messagebox style, and adds the proper csd category to the article. Jerry lavoie 03:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- nevermind... the user did it when he added the hangon... sorry. Jerry lavoie 03:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Cool, no worries. SparrowsWing (talk) 19:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Last edit key
When you revert an edit, where is the last edit link that you click and then click undo from there? Wikipedian27 23:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
HotUKDeals article
Can you help me make this Wiki-Worthy? See the talk page. ;-) I can send you a scan of the computer active article if necessary...
Well the links in the "Media Attention" section are all links to the articles on the newspaper's websites where it was mentioned. I wasnt sure how to use the references Tags properly so I tried to just link to them that way...
Re: Removing a speedy deletion tag
I don't recall the exact guidelines about when you can/can't remove them (I prefer WP:IAR and WP:COMMON anyway), but in this case it looks like you added the tags, in which case I'd sure hope you're just as free to remove them. ;) {{hangon}} rarely actually saves a page, but when it does, I'm very glad we keep it around. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Rhodesian Ridgeback
Surely you realize that the entire hybrids section of this article is unsourced. Ofcourse i know my own research into the matter shouldnt be added to wikipedia. But that definitive statement that the ridge gene is carried down needs a counter example. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HawkShark (talk • contribs) 04:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC).
Userpage
You may want to keep an eye out. A certain fellow had a liking to abusing your page. Willie Stark 20:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know - will keep watch. SparrowsWing (talk) 21:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
the page brandon schmitter was deleted and i was simply stating that someone vadalized and deleted it MCmustang51 03:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- It was deleted for a reason. Look at the deletion log. SparrowsWing (talk) 03:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Ronald Reagan info removal
Sorry I just did that. A user added a picture, but it looked bad where he put it, and it was too large. I just narrowed it down, and moved it. In the process, I deleted a photo. I was just going to put it back before you notified me. Again, sorry for that. Happyme22 04:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- No worries - I didn't realise you were moving the pic. SparrowsWing (talk) 04:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Proposal Pack
Why did you remove a page I was in the middle of working on for Proposal Pack? It's listed under business software. I also left a talk message on the page I was working on and didn't even get a chance to review it or finish working on the entry.
- I did not delete your page. Check the deletion log. 00:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Personal attack
Sorry it wasnt meant to be personal attack shes my friend sorry bout it Chriskbz 03:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
wrongly accusing
I'm sorry, but i have never even been to the mona lisa page-
i did not make those changes- but i suppose someone else did it on my computer! (i don't even have an anti virus program)
thank you anyway for taking the time to tell me i did something wrong (even if i didn't really) which shows you are a tireless contributor.
Tireless Contributor | ||
For contributing greatly to wikipedia 75.82.239.86 05:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC) |
new page watcher
hey, ive noticed you have watched alot of new pages and put them up for speedy deletion (like me) if they do not meet wikipedia criteria. so i want to give you this:
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
for all your work on making sure the Wikipedia Criteria is met on new pages. Mcoop06 00:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC) |
Edition in User Page
Someone has changed "This user owns one or more cockatiels", to "This user is owned by one or more cockatiels." Better watch out for abusers. Ziwhtam 01:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I also have a question about why my userpage is tagged and is trying to be deleted. What are the requirements for it to not be deleted? More info? I'm trying my best to fix spelling errors, info citations, and other helpful stuff. But then why is my site going to be deleted?