Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy: Difference between revisions
→Chorda tympani: new section |
|||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Lively debate on talk page which could use further input. Thanks[[User:Thelisteninghand|Thelisteninghand]] ([[User talk:Thelisteninghand|talk]]) 16:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC) |
Lively debate on talk page which could use further input. Thanks[[User:Thelisteninghand|Thelisteninghand]] ([[User talk:Thelisteninghand|talk]]) 16:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Chorda tympani == |
== [[Chorda tympani]] == |
||
Hi all, I'm new here, but excited to help! I know that chorda tympani was low on the priority list, but I was reading it today as a reference and found it difficult to follow. I overhauled the introduction and structure section. I also added sources. Do you all think there are enough sources to remove from the need citation list? Any and all feedback welcome. [[User:Anatomary|Anatomary]] ([[User talk:Anatomary|talk]]) 00:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC) |
Hi all, I'm new here, but excited to help! I know that chorda tympani was low on the priority list, but I was reading it today as a reference and found it difficult to follow. I overhauled the introduction and structure section. I also added sources. Do you all think there are enough sources to remove from the need citation list? Any and all feedback welcome. [[User:Anatomary|Anatomary]] ([[User talk:Anatomary|talk]]) 00:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:12, 27 January 2023
| WikiProject Anatomy | ||||||
 Main page |
 Discussion |
 Things To Do |
 Tools |
 Article alerts |
 Manual of Style |
 Resources |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Brachiocephalic artery
May I ask you something? Recently I edited brachiocephalic artery, and I am wondering how can I change start class of this page. --LR0725 (talk) 01:44, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi LR0725! Thank you for your work on the article. I've reassessed it up to C class - it is close to B class with some minor copyediting to follow WP:MEDMOS and other manuals. For article assessment, some just edit the talk page directly. However, if you are interested in article assessment in future, I can recommend installing Rater, a tool for article assessment. I use it very frequently. All the best, here and at other projects! Bibeyjj (talk) 08:08, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Bibeyjj: Thanks! This answer is what I searched for. Does making page B-class need some consensus or discuss with other project members? LR0725 (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- LR0725, you probably found your answers in regard to this ages ago, but for the record, the process and standards for the various grades are laid out at WP:ASSESS. With regard to the lower grades, there is no firm requirement to establish a consensus for a new grade beforehand: although in theory this determination is as subject to WP:LOCALCONSENSUS and WP:BRD as any other aspect of the article, I can't say as I can recall ever seeing an edit war regarding an article's rank even once--though I'm sure they must happen rarely. But for the most part, on lower-traffic articles, that haven't gotten enough attention to move up past C-class, most people just probably wouldn't even notice an edit to the grade, so you are somewhat in your discretion. In any event, the guideline is of course a good place to start for getting an idea of what broader community consensus is, regarding what should appear in an article that has been rating as meeting a certain threshold. And as the guideline also details, there is a very drastic shift to the other end of the spectrum for the two highest classes, with a robust formal process for both classes that is expected to be met before upgrading the designation. SnowRise let's rap 22:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Snow Rise, I just saw this good answer. Thanks a lot. LR0725 (talk) 12:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- LR0725, you probably found your answers in regard to this ages ago, but for the record, the process and standards for the various grades are laid out at WP:ASSESS. With regard to the lower grades, there is no firm requirement to establish a consensus for a new grade beforehand: although in theory this determination is as subject to WP:LOCALCONSENSUS and WP:BRD as any other aspect of the article, I can't say as I can recall ever seeing an edit war regarding an article's rank even once--though I'm sure they must happen rarely. But for the most part, on lower-traffic articles, that haven't gotten enough attention to move up past C-class, most people just probably wouldn't even notice an edit to the grade, so you are somewhat in your discretion. In any event, the guideline is of course a good place to start for getting an idea of what broader community consensus is, regarding what should appear in an article that has been rating as meeting a certain threshold. And as the guideline also details, there is a very drastic shift to the other end of the spectrum for the two highest classes, with a robust formal process for both classes that is expected to be met before upgrading the designation. SnowRise let's rap 22:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Bibeyjj: Thanks! This answer is what I searched for. Does making page B-class need some consensus or discuss with other project members? LR0725 (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Interest of Wikiproject
Can I assign anastomosis page to Wikiproject Anatomy? This page is important in anatomy too. --LR0725 (talk) 12:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Done. -- Athikhun.suw (talk) 04:30, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Sublingual ganglion
hello, please can info on this be added? Can't find any reference on wikipedia. Maybe it is because it is not always present in humans?>
https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sublingual+ganglion 5.167.170.80 (talk) 07:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Frenulum of prepuce of penis is insensitive?
Lively debate on talk page which could use further input. ThanksThelisteninghand (talk) 16:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi all, I'm new here, but excited to help! I know that chorda tympani was low on the priority list, but I was reading it today as a reference and found it difficult to follow. I overhauled the introduction and structure section. I also added sources. Do you all think there are enough sources to remove from the need citation list? Any and all feedback welcome. Anatomary (talk) 00:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)