Timeline of cosmological theories: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:36, 27 January 2023

This timeline of cosmological theories and discoveries is a chronological record of the development of humanity's understanding of the cosmos over the last two-plus millennia. Modern cosmological ideas follow the development of the scientific discipline of physical cosmology.

For millenia, what today is known to be the Solar System was regarded for generations as the contents of the "whole universe", so advances in the knowledge of both mostly paralleled. Clear distinction was not made until circa mid-17th century. See Timeline of Solar System astronomy for further details on this side.

Antiquity

c. 16th century BCE – Mesopotamian cosmology has a flat, circular Earth enclosed in a cosmic ocean.^[1]
c. 15th–11th century BCE – The Rigveda of Hinduism has some cosmological hymns, particularly in the late book 10, notably the Nasadiya Sukta which describes the origin of the universe, originating from the monistic Hiranyagarbha or "Golden Egg". Primal matter remains manifest for 311.04 trillion years and unmanifest for an equal length. The universe remains manifest for 4.32 billion years and unmanifest for an equal length. Innumerable universes exist simultaneously. These cycles have and will last forever, driven by desires.
6th century BCE – The Babylonian Map of the World shows the Earth surrounded by the cosmic ocean, with seven islands arranged around it so as to form a seven-pointed star. Contemporary Biblical cosmology reflects the same view of a flat, circular Earth swimming on water and overarched by the solid vault of the firmament to which are fastened the stars.
6th–4th century BCE – Greek philosophers, as early as Anaximander,^[2] introduce the idea of multiple or even infinite universes.^[3] Democritus further detailed that these worlds varied in distance, size; the presence, number and size of their suns and moons; and that they are subject to destructive collisions.^[4] Also during this time period, the Greeks established that the earth is spherical rather than flat.^[5]^[6]
6th century BCE – Anaximander conceives a mechanical, non-mythological model of the world: the Earth floats very still in the centre of the infinite, not supported by anything.^[7] Its curious shape is that of a cylinder^[8] with a height one-third of its diameter. The flat top forms the inhabited world, which is surrounded by a circular oceanic mass. Anaximander considered the Sun as a huge object (larger than the land of Peloponnesus^[9]), and consequently, he realized how far from Earth it might be. In his system the celestial bodies turned at different distances. At the origin, after the separation of hot and cold, a ball of flame appeared that surrounded Earth like bark on a tree. This ball broke apart to form the rest of the Universe. It resembled a system of hollow concentric wheels, filled with fire, with the rims pierced by holes like those of a flute. Consequently, the Sun was the fire that one could see through a hole the same size as the Earth on the farthest wheel, and an eclipse corresponded with the occlusion of that hole. The diameter of the solar wheel was twenty-seven times that of the Earth (or twenty-eight, depending on the sources)^[10] and the lunar wheel, whose fire was less intense, eighteen (or nineteen) times. Its hole could change shape, thus explaining lunar phases. The stars and the planets, located closer,^[11] followed the same model.^[12]
5th century BCE – Parmenides is credited to be the first Greek who declared that the Earth is spherical and is situated in the centre of the universe.^[13]
5th century BCE – Pythagoreans as Philolaus believed the motion of planets is caused by an out-of-sight "fire" at the centre of the universe (not the Sun) that powers them, and Sun and Earth orbit that Central Fire at different distances. The Earth's inhabited side is always opposite to the Central Fire, rendering it invisible to people. They also claimed that the Moon and the planets orbit the Earth.^[14] This model depicts a moving Earth, simultaneously self-rotating and orbiting around an external point (but not around the Sun), thus not being geocentrical, contrary to common intuition. Due to philosophical concerns about the number 10 (a "perfect number" for the Pythagorians), they also added a tenth "hidden body" or Counter-Earth (Antichthon), always in the opposite side of the invisible Central Fire and therefore also invisible from Earth.^[15]
4th century BCE – Plato claimed in his Timaeus that circles and spheres are the preferred shape of the universe, that the Earth is at the center and is circled by, ordered in-to-outwards: Moon, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and finally the fixed stars located on the celestial sphere.^[16] In Plato's complex cosmogony,^[17] the demiurge gave the primacy to the motion of Sameness and left it undivided; but he divided the motion of Difference in six parts, to have seven unequal circles. He prescribed these circles to move in opposite directions, three of them with equal speeds, the others with unequal speeds, but always in proportion. These circles are the orbits of the heavenly bodies: the three moving at equal speeds are the Sun, Venus and Mercury, while the four moving at unequal speeds are the Moon, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn.^[18]^[19] The complicated pattern of these movements is bound to be repeated again after a period called a 'complete' or 'perfect' year.^[20] However, others like Philolaus and Hicetas had rejected geocentrism.^[21]
4th century BCE – Eudoxus of Cnidus devised a geometric-mathematical model for the movements of the planets, the first known effort in this sense, based on (conceptual) concentric spheres centered on Earth.^[22] To explain the complexity of the movements of the planets along with that of the Sun and the Moon, Eudoxus thought they move as if they were attached to a number of concentrical, invisible spheres, every of them rotating around its own and different axis and at different paces. His model had twenty-seven homocentric spheres with each sphere explaining a type of observable motion for each celestial object. Eudoxus emphasised that this is a purely mathematical construct of the model in the sense that the spheres of each celestial body do not exist, it just shows the possible positions of the bodies.^[23] His model was later refined and expanded by Callippus.
4th century BCE – Aristotle follows the Plato's Earth-centered universe in which the Earth is stationary and the cosmos (or universe) is finite in extent but infinite in time. He argued for a spherical Earth using lunar eclipses^[24] and other observations. Aristotle adopted and expanded even more the previous Eudoxus' and Callippus' model, but by supposing the spheres were material and crystalline.^[25] Aristotle also tried to determine whether the Earth moves and concluded that all the celestial bodies fall towards Earth by natural tendency and since Earth is the centre of that tendency, it is stationary.^[26] Plato seems to have obscurely argued that the universe did have a beginning, but Aristotle and others interpreted his words differently.^[27]
4th century BCE – De Mundo – Five elements, situated in spheres in five regions, the less being in each case surrounded by the greater – namely, earth surrounded by water, water by air, air by fire, and fire by ether – make up the whole Universe.^[28]
4th century BCE – Heraclides Ponticus is said to be the first Greek who proposes that the Earth rotates on its axis, from west to east, once every 24 hours, contradicting Aristotle's teachings. Simplicius says that Heraclides proposed that the irregular movements of the planets can be explained if the Earth moves while the Sun stays still,^[29] but these statements are disputed.^[30]
3rd century BCE – Aristarchus of Samos proposes a Sun-centered universe and Earth's rotation in its own axis. He also provides evidences for his theory from his own observations.^[31]
3rd century BCE – Archimedes in his essay The Sand Reckoner, estimates the diameter of the cosmos to be the equivalent in stadia of what would in modern times be called two light years, if Aristarcus' theories were correct.
2nd century BCE – Seleucus of Seleucia elaborates on Aristarchus' heliocentric universe, using the phenomenon of tides to explain heliocentrism. Seleucus was the first to prove the heliocentric system through reasoning. Seleucus' arguments for a heliocentric cosmology were probably related to the phenomenon of tides. According to Strabo (1.1.9), Seleucus was the first to state that the tides are due to the attraction of the Moon, and that the height of the tides depends on the Moon's position relative to the Sun. Alternatively, he may have proved heliocentricity by determining the constants of a geometric model for it.^[32]
2nd century BCE – Apollonius of Perga shows the equivalence of two descriptions of the apparent retrograde planet motions (assuming the geocentric model), one using eccentrics and another deferent and epicycles.^[33] The latter will be a key feature for future models. The epicycle is described as a small orbit within a greater one, called the deferent: as a planet orbits the Earth, it also orbits the original orbit, so its trajectory resembles a curve known as an epitrochoid. This could explain how the planet seems to move as viewed from Earth.
2nd century BCE – Eratosthenes determines that the radius of the Earth is roughly 6,400 km.^[34]
2nd century BCE – Hipparchus uses parallax to determine that the distance to the Moon is roughly 380,000 km.^[35] The work of Hipparchus about the Earth-Moon system was so accurate that he could forecast solar and lunar eclipses for the next six centuries. Also, he discovers the precession of the equinoxes, and compiles a star catalog of about 850 entries.^[36]
c. 2nd century BCE–3rd century CE – In Hindu cosmology, the Manusmriti (1.67–80) and Puranas describe time as cyclical, with a new universe (planets and life) created by Brahma every 8.64 billion years. The universe is created, maintained, and destroyed within a kalpa (day of Brahma) period lasting for 4.32 billion years, and is followed by a pralaya (night) period of partial dissolution equal in duration. In some Puranas (e.g. Bhagavata Purana), a larger cycle of time is described where matter (mahat-tattva or universal womb) is created from primal matter (prakriti) and root matter (pradhana) every 622.08 trillion years, from which Brahma is born.^[37] The elements of the universe are created, used by Brahma, and fully dissolved within a maha-kalpa (life of Brahma; 100 of his 360-day years) period lasting for 311.04 trillion years containing 36,000 kalpas (days) and pralayas (nights), and is followed by a maha-pralaya period of full dissolution equal in duration.^[38]^[39]^[40]^[41] The texts also speak of innumerable worlds or universes.^[42]
2nd century CE – Ptolemy proposes an Earth-centered universe, with the Sun, Moon, and visible planets revolving around the Earth. Based on Apollonius' epicycles,^[43] he calculates the positions, orbits and positional equations of the Heavenly bodies along with instruments to measure these quantities. Ptolemy emphasised that the epicycle motion does not apply to the Sun. His main contribution to the model was the equant points. He also re-arranged the heavenly spheres in a different order than Plato did (from Earth outward): Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and fixed stars, following a long astrological tradition and the decreasing orbital periods. His book The Almagest, which also cataloged 1,022 stars and other astronomical objects (largely based upon Hipparchus'), remained the most authoritative text on astronomy and largest astronomical catalogue until the 17th century AD.^[44]^[45]

Middle Ages

2nd century CE-5th century CE – Jain cosmology considers the loka, or universe, as an uncreated entity, existing since infinity, the shape of the universe as similar to a man standing with legs apart and arm resting on his waist. This Universe, according to Jainism, is broad at the top, narrow at the middle and once again becomes broad at the bottom.
5th century (or earlier) – Buddhist texts speak of "hundreds of thousands of billions, countlessly, innumerably, boundlessly, incomparably, incalculably, unspeakably, inconceivably, immeasurably, inexplicably many worlds" to the east, and "infinite worlds in the ten directions".^[46]^[47]
5th century – Several Indian astronomers propose a rudimentary Sun-centered universe, including Aryabhata. He also writes a treatise on motion of planets, sun and moon and stars.Aryabhatta puts forward the theory of rotation of the earth in its own axis and explained day and night was caused by the diurnal rotation of the earth. He also provided empirical evidence for his notion from his astronomical experiments and observation.^[48]
5th century – The Jewish talmud gives an argument for finite universe theory along with explanation.
5th century – Martianus Capella describes a modified geocentric model, in which the Earth is at rest in the center of the universe and circled by the Moon, the Sun, three planets and the stars, while Mercury and Venus circle the Sun, all surrounded by the sphere of fixed stars.^[49]
6th century – John Philoponus proposes a universe that is finite in time and argues against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite universe
7th century – The Quran says in Chapter 21: Verse 30 – "Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them".
9th–12th centuries – Al-Kindi (Alkindus), Saadia Gaon (Saadia ben Joseph) and Al-Ghazali (Algazel) support a universe that has a finite past and develop two logical arguments for the notion.
12th century – Fakhr al-Din al-Razi discusses Islamic cosmology, rejects Aristotle's idea of an Earth-centered universe, and, in the context of his commentary on the Quranic verse, "All praise belongs to God, Lord of the Worlds," and proposes that the universe has more than "a thousand worlds beyond this world."^[50]
14th century – Jewish astronomer Levi ben Gershon (Gersonides) estimates the distance to the outermost orb of the fixed stars to be no less than 159,651,513,380,944 Earth radii, or about 100,000 light-years in modern units.^[51]
14th century – Several European mathematicians and astronomers develop the theory of Earth's rotation including Nicole Oresme. Oresme also give logical reasoning, empirical evidence and mathematical proofs for his notion.^[52]^[53]
15th century – Nicholas of Cusa proposes that the Earth rotates on its axis in his book, On Learned Ignorance (1440).^[54]

Renaissance

15th–16th centuries – Nilakantha Somayaji and Tycho Brahe propose a universe in which the planets orbit the Sun and the Sun orbits the Earth, known as the Tychonic system.
1543 – Nicolaus Copernicus publishes his heliocentric universe in his De revolutionibus orbium coelestium.^[55]
1576 – Thomas Digges modifies the Copernican system by removing its outer edge and replacing the edge with a star-filled unbounded space.^[56]
1584 – Giordano Bruno proposes a non-hierarchical cosmology, wherein the Copernican Solar System is not the center of the universe, but rather, a relatively insignificant star system, amongst an infinite multitude of others.^[57]
1600 – William Gilbert rejects the idea of a limiting sphere of the fixed stars for which no proof has been offered.^[58]
1608 – Galileo Galilei examines the skies and constellations thru telescope and soon knew that the "fixed stars" which had been studied and mapped were only a tiny portion of the massive universe that lay beyond the reach of the naked eye.^[59] When in 1610 he aimed his telescope to the faint strip of the Milky Way, he found it resolves into countless white star-like spots, presumably farther stars themselves.^[60]
1610 – Johannes Kepler uses the dark night sky to argue for a finite universe. Shortly after, it was proved by Kepler himself that the Jupiter's moons move around the planet the same way planets orbit the Sun, thus making Kepler's laws universal.^[61]

Enlightenment to Victorian Era

1687 – Isaac Newton's laws describe large-scale motion throughout the universe. The universal force of gravity suggested that stars could not simply be fixed or at rest, as their gravitational pulls cause "mutual attraction" and therefore cause them to move in relation to each other.^[62]
1718 – Edmund Halley discovers proper motion of stars, dispelling the concept of the "fixed stars".^[63]
1720 – Edmund Halley puts forth an early form of Olbers' paradox.
1729 – James Bradley discovers the aberration of light, which proved the Earth's motion around the Sun.^[64]
1744 – Jean-Philippe de Cheseaux puts forth an early form of Olbers' paradox.
1755 – Immanuel Kant asserts that the nebulae are really galaxies separate from, independent of, and outside the Milky Way Galaxy; he calls them island universes.
1781 – Charles Messier and his assistant Pierre Méchain publish the first catalogue of 110 nebulae and star clusters, the most prominent deep-sky objects that can easily be observed from Earth's Northern Hemisphere, in order not to be confused with ordinary Solar System's comets.^[65]
1785 – William Herschel proposes a heliocentric model of the universe that Earth's Sun is at or near the center of the universe, which at the time was assumed to only be the Milky Way Galaxy.^[66]
1791 – Erasmus Darwin pens the first description of a cyclical expanding and contracting universe in his poem The Economy of Vegetation.
1796 – Pierre Laplace re-states the nebular hypothesis for the formation of the Solar System from a spinning nebula of gas and dust.^[67]
1826 – Heinrich Wilhelm Olbers puts forth Olbers' paradox.
1837 – Following over 100 years of unsuccessful attempts, Thomas Henderson,^[68] Friedrich Bessel,^[69] and Otto Struve measure the parallax of a few nearby stars; this is the first measurement of any distances outside the Solar System.
1848 – Edgar Allan Poe offers first correct solution to Olbers' paradox in Eureka: A Prose Poem, an essay that also suggests the expansion and collapse of the universe.
1860s – William Huggins develops astronomical spectroscopy; he shows that the Orion nebula is mostly made of gas, while the Andromeda nebula (later called Andromeda Galaxy) is probably dominated by stars.
1862 – By analysing the spectroscopic signature of the Sun and comparing it to those of other stars, Father Angelo Secchi determines that the Sun in itself is also a star.^[70]
1887 – The Michelson–Morley experiment, intended to measure the relative motion of Earth through the (assumed) stationary luminiferous aether, got no results. This put an end to the centuries-old idea of the aether, dating back to Aristotle, and with it all the contemporary aether theories.^[71]
1897 – William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin, based on the thermal radiation rate and the gravitational contraction forces, argues the age of the Sun to be no more than 20 million years – unless some energy source beyond what was then known was found.^[72]

1901–1950

1904 – Ernest Rutherford argues, in a lecture attended by Kelvin, that radioactive decay releases heat, providing the unknown energy source Kelvin had suggested, and ultimately leading to radiometric dating of rocks which reveals ages of billions of years for the Solar System bodies, hence the Sun and all the stars.^[73]
1905 – Albert Einstein publishes the Special Theory of Relativity, positing that space and time are not separate continua.
1912 – Henrietta Leavitt discovers the period-luminosity law for Cepheid variable stars, which becomes a crucial step in measuring distances to other galaxies.
1915 – Robert Innes discovers Proxima Centauri, the closest star to Earth after the Sun.^[74]
1915 – Albert Einstein publishes the General Theory of Relativity, showing that an energy density warps spacetime.
1917 – Willem de Sitter derives an isotropic static cosmology with a cosmological constant, as well as an empty expanding cosmology with a cosmological constant, termed a de Sitter universe.
1918 – Harlow Shapley's work on globular clusters showed that the heliocentrism model of cosmology was wrong, and galactocentrism replaced heliocentrism as the dominant model of cosmology.^[66]
1919 – Arthur Stanley Eddington uses a solar eclipse to successfully test Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.^[75]
1920 – The Shapley-Curtis Debate, on the distances to spiral nebulae, takes place at the Smithsonian.
1921 – The National Research Council (NRC) published the official transcript of the Shapley-Curtis Debate. Galaxies are finally recognized as objects beyond the Milky Way, and the Milky Way as a galaxy proper.^[76]
1922 – Vesto Slipher summarizes his findings on the spiral nebulae's systematic redshifts.
1922 – Alexander Friedmann finds a solution to the Einstein field equations which suggests a general expansion of space.
1923 – Edwin Hubble measures distances to a few nearby spiral nebulae (galaxies), the Andromeda Galaxy (M31), Triangulum Galaxy (M33), and NGC 6822. The distances place them far outside the Milky Way, and implies that fainter galaxies are much more distant, and the universe is composed of many thousands of galaxies.
1927 – Georges Lemaître discusses the creation event of an expanding universe governed by the Einstein field equations. From its solutions to the Einstein equations, he predicts the distance-redshift relation.
1928 – Howard P. Robertson briefly mentions that Vesto Slipher's redshift measurements combined with brightness measurements of the same galaxies indicate a redshift-distance relation.
1929 – Edwin Hubble demonstrates the linear redshift-distance relationship and thus shows the expansion of the universe.
1932 – Karl Guthe Jansky recognizes received radio signals coming from outer space as extrasolar, coming mainly from Sagittarius.^[77] They are the first evidence of the center of the Milky Way, and the firsts experiences that founded the discipline of radio astronomy.
1933 – Edward Milne names and formalizes the cosmological principle.
1933 – Fritz Zwicky shows that the Coma cluster of galaxies contains large amounts of dark matter. This result agrees with modern measurements, but is generally ignored until the 1970s.
1934 – Georges Lemaître interprets the cosmological constant as due to a vacuum energy with an unusual perfect fluid equation of state.
1938 – Hans Bethe calculates the details of the two main energy-producing nuclear reactions that power the stars.^[78]^[79]
1938 – Paul Dirac suggests the large numbers hypothesis, that the gravitational constant may be small because it is decreasing slowly with time.
1948 – Ralph Alpher, Hans Bethe ("in absentia"), and George Gamow examine element synthesis in a rapidly expanding and cooling universe, and suggest that the elements were produced by rapid neutron capture.
1948 – Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle propose steady state cosmologies based on the perfect cosmological principle.
1948 – George Gamow predicts the existence of the cosmic microwave background radiation by considering the behavior of primordial radiation in an expanding universe.

1951–2000

1950 – Fred Hoyle coins the term "Big Bang", saying that it was not derisive; it was just a striking image meant to highlight the difference between that and the Steady-State model.
1961 – Robert Dicke argues that carbon-based life can only arise when the gravitational force is small, because this is when burning stars exist; first use of the weak anthropic principle
1963 – Maarten Schmidt discovers the first quasar; these soon provide a probe of the universe back to substantial redshifts.
1965 – Hannes Alfvén proposes the now-discounted concept of ambiplasma to explain baryon asymmetry and supports the idea of an infinite universe.
1965 – Martin Rees and Dennis Sciama analyze quasar source count data and discover that the quasar density increases with redshift.
1965 – Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, astronomers at Bell Labs discover the 2.7 K microwave background radiation, which earns them the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics. Robert Dicke, James Peebles, Peter Roll and David Todd Wilkinson interpret it as a relic from the big bang.
1966 – Stephen Hawking and George Ellis show that any plausible general relativistic cosmology is singular
1966 – James Peebles shows that the hot Big Bang predicts the correct helium abundance
1967 – Andrei Sakharov presents the requirements for baryogenesis, a baryon-antibaryon asymmetry in the universe
1967 – John Bahcall, Wal Sargent, and Maarten Schmidt measure the fine-structure splitting of spectral lines in 3C191 and thereby show that the fine-structure constant does not vary significantly with time
1967 – Robert Wagner, William Fowler, and Fred Hoyle show that the hot Big Bang predicts the correct deuterium and lithium abundances
1968 – Brandon Carter speculates that perhaps the fundamental constants of nature must lie within a restricted range to allow the emergence of life; first use of the strong anthropic principle
1969 – Charles Misner formally presents the Big Bang horizon problem
1969 – Robert Dicke formally presents the Big Bang flatness problem
1970 – Vera Rubin and Kent Ford measure spiral galaxy rotation curves at large radii, showing evidence for substantial amounts of dark matter.
1973 – Edward Tryon proposes that the universe may be a large scale quantum mechanical vacuum fluctuation where positive mass-energy is balanced by negative gravitational potential energy
1976 – Alex Shlyakhter uses samarium ratios from the Oklo prehistoric natural nuclear fission reactor in Gabon to show that some laws of physics have remained unchanged for over two billion years
1977 – Gary Steigman, David Schramm, and James Gunn examine the relation between the primordial helium abundance and number of neutrinos and claim that at most five lepton families can exist.
1980 – Alan Guth and Alexei Starobinsky independently propose the inflationary Big Bang universe as a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems.
1981 – Viatcheslav Mukhanov and G. Chibisov propose that quantum fluctuations could lead to large scale structure in an inflationary universe.
1982 – The first CfA galaxy redshift survey is completed.
1982 – Several groups including James Peebles, J. Richard Bond and George Blumenthal propose that the universe is dominated by cold dark matter.
1983–1987 – The first large computer simulations of cosmic structure formation are run by Davis, Efstathiou, Frenk and White. The results show that cold dark matter produces a reasonable match to observations, but hot dark matter does not.
1988 – The CfA2 Great Wall is discovered in the CfA2 redshift survey.
1988 – Measurements of galaxy large-scale flows provide evidence for the Great Attractor.
1990 – The Hubble Space Telescope is launched.^[80]. It is aimed primarily at deep-space objects.
1990 – Preliminary results from NASA's COBE mission confirm the cosmic microwave background radiation has a blackbody spectrum to an astonishing one part in 10⁵ precision, thus eliminating the possibility of an integrated starlight model proposed for the background by steady state enthusiasts.
1992 – Further COBE measurements discover the very small anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background, providing a "baby picture" of the seeds of large-scale structure when the universe was around 1/1100th of its present size and 380,000 years old.
1992 – First planetary system beyond the Solar System detected, around the pulsar PSR B1257+12.^[81]
1995 – The first planet around a Sun-like star is discovered, in orbit around the star 51 Pegasi.^[82]
1996 – The first Hubble Deep Field is released, providing a clear view of very distant galaxies when the universe was around one-third of its present age.
1998 – Controversial evidence for the fine-structure constant varying over the lifetime of the universe is first published.
1998 – The Supernova Cosmology Project and High-Z Supernova Search Team discover cosmic acceleration based on distances to Type Ia supernovae, providing the first direct evidence for a non-zero cosmological constant.
1999 – Measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation with finer resolution than COBE, (most notably by the BOOMERanG experiment see Mauskopf et al., 1999, Melchiorri et al., 1999, de Bernardis et al. 2000) provide evidence for oscillations (the first acoustic peak) in the anisotropy angular spectrum, as expected in the standard model of cosmological structure formation. The angular position of this peak indicates that the geometry of the universe is close to flat.

2001–present

2001 – The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dF) by an Australian/British team gave strong evidence that the matter density is near 25% of critical density. Together with the CMB results for a flat universe, this provides independent evidence for a cosmological constant or similar dark energy.
2002 – The Cosmic Background Imager (CBI) in Chile obtained images of the cosmic microwave background radiation with the highest angular resolution of 4 arc minutes. It also obtained the anisotropy spectrum at high-resolution not covered before up to l ~ 3000. It found a slight excess in power at high-resolution (l > 2500) not yet completely explained, the so-called "CBI-excess".
2003 – NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) obtained full-sky detailed pictures of the cosmic microwave background radiation. The images can be interpreted to indicate that the universe is 13.7 billion years old (within one percent error), and are very consistent with the Lambda-CDM model and the density fluctuations predicted by inflation.
2003 – The Sloan Great Wall is discovered.
2004 – The Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI) first obtained the E-mode polarization spectrum of the cosmic microwave background radiation.
2004 – Voyager 1 sends back the first data ever obtained from within the Solar System's heliosheath.^[83]
2005 – The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and 2dF redshift surveys both detected the baryon acoustic oscillation feature in the galaxy distribution, a key prediction of cold dark matter models.
2006 – Three-year WMAP results are released, confirming previous analysis, correcting several points, and including polarization data.
2009–2013 – Planck, a space observatory operated by the European Space Agency (ESA), mapped the anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background radiation, with increased sensitivity and small angular resolution.
2006–2011 – Improved measurements from WMAP, new supernova surveys ESSENCE and SNLS, and baryon acoustic oscillations from SDSS and WiggleZ, continue to be consistent with the standard Lambda-CDM model.
2014 – Astrophysicists of the BICEP2 collaboration announce the detection of inflationary gravitational waves in the B-mode power spectrum, which if confirmed, would provide clear experimental evidence for the theory of inflation.^[84]^[85]^[86]^[87]^[88]^[89] However, in June lowered confidence in confirming the cosmic inflation findings was reported.^[88]^[90]^[91]
2016 – LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration announce that gravitational waves were directly detected by two LIGO detectors. The waveform matched the prediction of General relativity for a gravitational wave emanating from the inward spiral and merger of a pair of black holes of around 36 and 29 solar masses and the subsequent "ringdown" of the single resulting black hole.^[92]^[93]^[94] The second detection verified that GW150914 is not a fluke, thus opens entire new branch in astrophysics, gravitational-wave astronomy.^[95]^[96]
2019 – The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration publishes the image of the black hole at the center of the M87 Galaxy.^[97] This is the first time astronomers have ever captured an image of a black hole, which once again proves the existence of black holes and thus helps verify Einstein's general theory of relativity.^[98] This was done by utilising very-long-baseline interferometry.^[99]
2020 – Physicist Lucas Lombriser of the University of Geneva presents a possible way of reconciling the two significantly different determinations of the Hubble constant by proposing the notion of a surrounding vast "bubble", 250 million light years in diameter, that is half the density of the rest of the universe.^[100]^[101]
2020 – Scientists publish a study which suggests that the Universe is no longer expanding at the same rate in all directions and that therefore the widely accepted isotropy hypothesis might be wrong. While previous studies already suggested this, the study is the first to examine galaxy clusters in X-rays and, according to Norbert Schartel, has a much greater significance. The study found a consistent and strong directional behavior of deviations – which have earlier been described to indicate a "crisis of cosmology" by others – of the normalization parameter A, or the Hubble constant H0. Beyond the potential cosmological implications, it shows that studies which assume perfect isotropy in the properties of galaxy clusters and their scaling relations can produce strongly biased results.^[102]^[103]^[104]^[105]^[106]
2020 – Scientists report verifying measurements 2011–2014 via ULAS J1120+0641 of what seem to be a spatial variation in four measurements of the fine-structure constant, a basic physical constant used to measure electromagnetism between charged particles, which indicates that there might be directionality with varying natural constants in the Universe which would have implications for theories on the emergence of habitability of the Universe and be at odds with the widely accepted theory of constant natural laws and the standard model of cosmology which is based on an isotropic Universe.^[107]^[108]^[109]^[110]

References

^ Horowitz (1998), p. xii
^
This is a matter of debate:
- Cornford, F. M. (1934). "Innumerable Worlds in Presocratic Philosophy". The Classical Quarterly. 28 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1017/S0009838800009897. ISSN 1471-6844. S2CID 170168443.
- Curd, Patricia; Graham, Daniel W. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 239–41. ISBN 978-0-19-972244-0.
- Gregory, Andrew (2016). "7 Anaximander: One Cosmos or Many?". Anaximander: A Re-assessment. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 121–142. ISBN 978-1472506252.
^
- Siegfried, Tom. "Long Live the Multiverse!". Scientific American.
- Siegfried, Tom (2019). "Aristotle versus the Atomists". The number of the heavens : a history of the multiverse and the quest to understand the cosmos. Harvard. ISBN 978-0674975880.
^
"there are innumerable worlds of different sizes. In some there is neither sun nor moon, in others they are larger than in ours and others have more than one. These worlds are at irregular distances, more in one direction and less in another, and some are flourishing, others declining. Here they come into being, there they die, and they are destroyed by collision with one another. Some of the worlds have no animal or vegetable life nor any water."
- Guthrie, W. K. C.; Guthrie, William Keith Chambers (1962). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 2, The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 404–06. ISBN 978-0-521-29421-8.
- Vamvacas, Constantine J. (2009). The Founders of Western Thought – The Presocratics: A diachronic parallelism between Presocratic Thought and Philosophy and the Natural Sciences. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 219–20. ISBN 978-1-4020-9791-1.
^ "Ancient Greek Astronomy and Cosmology | Modeling the Cosmos | Articles and Essays | Finding Our Place in the Cosmos: From Galileo to Sagan and Beyond | Digital Collections | Library of Congress". Library of Congress. Washington, DC.
^ Blakemore, Erin. "Christopher Columbus Never Set Out to Prove the Earth was Round". History.com.
^ Aristotle, On the Heavens, ii, 13
^ "A column of stone", Aetius reports in De Fide (III, 7, 1), or "similar to a pillar-shaped stone", pseudo-Plutarch (III, 10).
^ Sider, D. (1973). "Anaxagoras on the Size of the Sun". Classical Philology. 68 (2): 128–129. doi:10.1086/365951. JSTOR 269068. S2CID 161940013.
^ In Refutation, it is reported that the circle of the Sun is twenty-seven times bigger than the Moon.
^ Aetius, De Fide (II, 15, 6)
^ Most of Anaximander's model of the Universe comes from pseudo-Plutarch (II, 20–28):
"[The Sun] is a circle twenty-eight times as big as the Earth, with the outline similar to that of a fire-filled chariot wheel, on which appears a mouth in certain places and through which it exposes its fire, as through the hole on a flute. [...] the Sun is equal to the Earth, but the circle on which it breathes and on which it's borne is twenty-seven times as big as the whole earth. [...] [The eclipse] is when the mouth from which comes the fire heat is closed. [...] [The Moon] is a circle nineteen times as big as the whole earth, all filled with fire, like that of the Sun".
^ Laërtius, Diogenes (1925). "Others: Parmenides" . Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Vol. 2:9. Translated by Hicks, Robert Drew (Two volume ed.). Loeb Classical Library.
^ Thurston, Hugh (1994). Early astronomy. New York: Springer-Verlag New York. p. 111. ISBN 0-387-94107-X.
^ Dreyer, John Louis Emil (1906). History of the planetary systems from Thales to Kepler. p. 42. To complete the number ten, Philolaus created the antichthon, or counter-earth. This tenth planet is always invisible to us, because it is between us and the central fire and always keeps pace with the Earth.
^ Pedersen, Olaf (1993). Early physics and astronomy. A historical introduction. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-40340-5.
^ "The components from which he made the soul and the way in which he made it were as follows: In between the Being that is indivisible and always changeless, and the one that is divisible and comes to be in the corporeal realm, he mixed a third, intermediate form of being, derived from the other two. Similarly, he made a mixture of the Same, and then one of the Different, in between their indivisible and their corporeal, divisible counterparts. And he took the three mixtures and mixed them together to make a uniform mixture, forcing the Different, which was hard to mix, into conformity with the Same. Now when he had mixed these two with Being, and from the three had made a single mixture, he redivided the whole mixture into as many parts as his task required, each part remaining a mixture of the Same, the Different and Being." (35a-b), translation Donald J. Zeyl
^ Plato, Timaeus, 36c
^ Plato, Timaeus, 36d
^ Plato, Timaeus, 39d
^ Encyclopædia Britannica (2019). "heliocentrism | Definition, History, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica.
^ Yavetz, Ido (February 1998). "On the Homocentric Spheres of Eudoxus". Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 52 (3): 222–225. Bibcode:1998AHES...52..222Y. doi:10.1007/s004070050017. JSTOR 41134047. S2CID 121186044.
^ Crowe, Michael (2001). Theories of the World from Antiquity to the Copernican Revolution. Mineola, NY: Dover. p. 23. ISBN 0-486-41444-2.
^ De caelo, 297b31–298a10
^ Easterling, H (1961). "Homocentric Spheres in De Caelo". Phronesis. 6 (2): 138–141. doi:10.1163/156852861x00161. JSTOR 4181694.
^ Thurston, Hugh (1994). Early astronomy. New York: Springer-Verlag New York. p. 118. ISBN 0-387-94107-X.
^ Sorabji, Richard (2005). The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: Physics. Cornell University Press. p. 175. ISBN 978-0-8014-8988-4.
^ Aristotle; Forster, E. S. (Edward Seymour); Dobson, J. F. (John Frederic) (1914). De Mundo. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. p. 2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Simplicius (2003). "Physics 2". On Aristotle's. Translated by Fleet, Barries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 48.
^ Eastwood, Bruce (1992). "Heraclides and Heliocentrism: Texts, Diagrams, and Interpretations". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 23 (4): 253. Bibcode:1992JHA....23..233E. doi:10.1177/002182869202300401. S2CID 118643709.
^ D., J. L. E. (July 1913). "Aristarchus of Samos: The Ancient Copernicus". Nature. 91 (2281): 499–500. doi:10.1038/091499a0. ISSN 1476-4687.
^ "Aristarchus of Samos (310-230 BC) | High Altitude Observatory". www2.hao.ucar.edu. Retrieved 2022-06-30.
^ Carrol, Bradley and Ostlie, Dale, An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, 2007. pp. 4
^ Russo, Lucio (2004). The forgotten revolution : how science was born in 300 BC and why it had to be reborn. Berlin: Springer. p. 68. ISBN 3-540-20396-6. OCLC 52945835.
^ G. J. Toomer, "Hipparchus on the distances of the sun and moon," Archive for History of Exact Sciences 14 (1974), 126–142.
^ Alexander Jones "Ptolemy in Perspective: Use and Criticism of his Work from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century, Springer, 2010, p.36.
^ "Mahattattva, Mahat-tattva: 5 definitions". Wisdom Library. February 10, 2021. Mahattattva (महत्तत्त्व) or simply Mahat refers to a primordial principle of the nature of both pradhāna and puruṣa, according to the 10th century Saurapurāṇa: one of the various Upapurāṇas depicting Śaivism.—[...] From the disturbed prakṛti and the puruṣa sprang up the seed of mahat, which is of the nature of both pradhāna and puruṣa. The mahattattva is then covered by the pradhāna and being so covered it differentiates itself as the sāttvika, rājasa and tāmasa-mahat. The pradhāna covers the mahat just as a seed is covered by the skin. Being so covered there spring from the three fold mahat the threefold ahaṃkāra called vaikārika, taijasa and bhūtādi or tāmasa.
^ Gupta, S. V. (2010). "Ch. 1.2.4 Time Measurements". In Hull, Robert; Osgood, Richard M. Jr.; Parisi, Jurgen; Warlimont, Hans (eds.). Units of Measurement: Past, Present and Future. International System of Units. Springer Series in Materials Science: 122. Springer. pp. 7–8. ISBN 9783642007378.
^ Penprase, Bryan E. (2017). The Power of Stars (2nd ed.). Springer. p. 182. ISBN 9783319525976.
^ Johnson, W.J. (2009). A Dictionary of Hinduism. Oxford University Press. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-19-861025-0.
^ Fernandez, Elizabeth. "The Multiverse And Eastern Philosophy". Forbes.
^
- Zimmer, Heinrich Robert (2018). Myths and Symbols in Indian Art and Civilization. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-21201-2.
- Penprase, Bryan E. (2017). The Power of Stars. Springer. p. 137. ISBN 978-3-319-52597-6.
- Campbell, Joseph (2015). Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks, Eranos 3: Man and Time. Princeton University Press. p. 176. ISBN 978-1-4008-7485-9.
- Henderson, Joseph Lewis; Oakes, Maud (1990). The Wisdom of the Serpent: The Myths of Death, Rebirth, and Resurrection. Princeton University Press. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-691-02064-8.
^ North, John (1995). The Norton History of Astronomy and Cosmology. New York: W.W.Norton & Company, Inc. p. 115. ISBN 0-393-03656-1.
^ jones, prudence (2011-01-01), "Ptolemy", Dictionary of African Biography, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acref/9780195382075.001.0001/acref-9780195382075-e-1700, ISBN 978-0-19-538207-5, retrieved 2022-11-09
^ Swerdlow, N. M. (February 2021). "The Almagest in the Manner of Euclid". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 52 (1): 104–107. doi:10.1177/0021828620977214. ISSN 0021-8286.
^ Jackson, Roger; Makransky, John (2013). Buddhist Theology: Critical Reflections by Contemporary Buddhist Scholars. Routledge. p. 118. ISBN 978-1-136-83012-9.
^ Reat, N. Ross; Perry, Edmund F. (1991). A World Theology: The Central Spiritual Reality of Humankind. Cambridge University Press. p. 112. ISBN 978-0-521-33159-3.
^ India, Digital Branding Learners (2019-01-01). "Aryabhatta and the great Indian Mathematicians". Learners India.
^ Bruce S. Eastwood, Ordering the Heavens: Roman Astronomy and Cosmology in the Carolingian Renaissance (Leiden: Brill, 2007), pp. 238-9.
^ Adi Setia (2004). "Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi on Physics and the Nature of the Physical World: A Preliminary Survey". Islam & Science. 2. Archived from the original on 2012-07-10. Retrieved 2010-03-02.
^ Kennedy, E. S. (1986-06-01). "The Astronomy of Levi ben Gerson (1288–1344): A Critical Edition of Chapters 1–20 with Translation and Commentary. Levi ben Gerson, Bernard R. Goldstein". Isis. 77 (2): 371–372. doi:10.1086/354184. ISSN 0021-1753.
^ Kirschner, Stefan (2021), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), "Nicole Oresme", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2022-11-09
^ "Episode 11: The Legacy of Ptolemy's Almagest". www.aip.org. 2022-09-28. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
^ Misner, Thorne and Wheeler
^ "Nicolaus Copernicus - University of Bologna". www.unibo.it. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
^ Hellyer, Marcus, ed. (2008). The Scientific Revolution: The Essential Readings. Blackwell Essential Readings in History. Vol. 7. John Wiley & Sons. p. 63. ISBN 9780470754771. The Puritan Thomas Digges (1546–1595?) was the earliest Englishman to offer a defense of the Copernican theory. ... Accompanying Digges's account is a diagram of the universe portraying the heliocentric system surrounded by the orb of fixed stars, described by Digges as infinitely extended in all dimensions.
^ Bruno, Giordano. "Third Dialogue". On the infinite universe and worlds. Archived from the original on 27 April 2012.
^ Gilbert, William (1893). "Book 6, Chapter III". De Magnete. Translated by Mottelay, P. Fleury. (Facsimile). New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-26761-X.
^ Taton, René; Wilson, Curtis (1989). Planetary astronomy from the Renaissance to the rise of astrophysics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-24254-1. OCLC 769917781.
^ Galileo Galilei, Sidereus Nuncius (Venice, (Italy): Thomas Baglioni, 1610), pages 15 and 16. Archived March 16, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
English translation: Galileo Galilei with Edward Stafford Carlos, trans., The Sidereal Messenger (London: Rivingtons, 1880), pages 42 and 43. Archived December 2, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
^ Christian Frisch, ed., Joannis Kepleri Astronomi Opera Omnia, vol. 6 (Frankfurt-am-Main, (Germany): Heyder & Zimmer, 1866), page 361.)
^ Bartusiak, Marcia (2004). Archives of the universe : a treasury of astronomy's historic works of discovery (1st ed.). New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN 0-375-42170-X. OCLC 54966424.
^ Otto Neugebauer (1975). A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. Birkhäuser. p. 1084. ISBN 978-3-540-06995-9.
^ Bradley, James (1727–1728). "A Letter from the Reverend Mr. James Bradley Savilian Professor of Astronomy at Oxford, and F.R.S. to Dr.Edmond Halley Astronom. Reg. &c. Giving an Account of a New Discovered Motion of the Fix'd Stars". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 35 (406): 637–661. Bibcode:1727RSPT...35..637B. doi:10.1098/rstl.1727.0064.
^ "Original Messier Catalog of 1781". Students for the Exploration and Development of Space. 10 November 2007.
^ ^a ^b Berendzen, Richard (1975). "Geocentric to heliocentric to galactocentric to acentric: the continuing assault to the egocentric". Vistas in Astronomy. 17 (1): 65–83. Bibcode:1975VA.....17...65B. doi:10.1016/0083-6656(75)90049-5.
^ Owen, T. C. (2001) "Solar system: origin of the solar system", Encyclopædia Britannica, Deluxe CDROM edition
^ Henderson, Thomas (1839). "On the Parallax of α Centauri". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 4 (19): 168–170. Bibcode:1839MNRAS...4..168H. doi:10.1093/mnras/4.19.168.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
^ Bessel, F. W. (1838b). "On the parallax of 61 Cygni". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 4 (17): 152–161. Bibcode:1838MNRAS...4..152B. doi:10.1093/mnras/4.17.152.
^ Pohle, J. (1913). "Angelo Secchi" . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. [...][his] theory of the unity of the world and of the identity of the fixed stars and the sun received most profound scientific demonstration and confirmation.
^ Michelson, Albert A.; Morley, Edward W. (1887). "On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether" . American Journal of Science. 34 (203): 333–345. Bibcode:1887AmJS...34..333M. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-34.203.333. S2CID 124333204.
^ Thomson, William (1862). "On the Age of the Sun's Heat". Macmillan's Magazine. Vol. 5. pp. 388–393.
^ England, P.; Molnar, P.; Righter, F. (January 2007). "John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics". GSA Today. Vol. 17, no. 1. pp. 4–9. doi:10.1130/GSAT01701A.1.
^ Glass, I.S. (2008). Proxima, the Nearest Star (other than the Sun). Cape Town: Mons Mensa.
^ Dyson, F.W.; Eddington, A.S.; Davidson, C.R. (1920). "A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun's Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Solar eclipse of May 29, 1919". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 220 (571–581): 291–333. Bibcode:1920RSPTA.220..291D. doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009.
^ Evans, Ben (April 25, 2020). "The Great Debate - 100 years later". Astronomy.com. Retrieved 2020-09-10.
^ Karl Jansky (Oct 1933). "Electrical Disturbances Apparently of Extraterrestrial Origin". Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers. 21 (10): 1387–1398. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1933.227458. See also Karl Jansky (Jul 8, 1933). "Radio Waves from Outside the Solar System" (PDF). Nature. 132 (3323): 66. doi:10.1038/132066a0. S2CID 4063838.
^ Bethe, H.; Critchfield, C. (1938). "On the Formation of Deuterons by Proton Combination". Physical Review. 54 (10): 862. Bibcode:1938PhRv...54Q.862B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.54.862.2.
^ Bethe, H. (1939). "Energy Production in Stars". Physical Review. 55 (1): 434–456. Bibcode:1939PhRv...55..434B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.434. PMID 17835673. S2CID 36146598.
^ "STS-31". NASA. Archived from the original on August 15, 2011. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
^ Wolszczan, A.; Frail, D. (1992). "A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12". Nature. 355 (6356): 145–147. Bibcode:1992Natur.355..145W. doi:10.1038/355145a0. S2CID 4260368.
^ Mayor, Michael; Queloz, Didier (1995). "A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star". Nature. 378 (6555): 355–359. Bibcode:1995Natur.378..355M. doi:10.1038/378355a0. S2CID 4339201.
^ "Voyager 1 Sees Solar Wind Decline". NASA. December 13, 2010. Archived from the original on June 14, 2011. Retrieved September 16, 2013.
^ Staff (March 17, 2014). "BICEP2 2014 Results Release". National Science Foundation. Retrieved March 18, 2014.
^ Clavin, Whitney (March 17, 2014). "NASA Technology Views Birth of the Universe". NASA. Retrieved March 17, 2014.
^ Overbye, Dennis (March 17, 2014). "Space Ripples Reveal Big Bang's Smoking Gun". The New York Times. Retrieved March 17, 2014.
^ Overbye, Dennis (March 24, 2014). "Ripples From the Big Bang". New York Times. Retrieved March 24, 2014.
^ ^a ^b Ade, P.A.R.; BICEP2 Collaboration (June 19, 2014). "Detection of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2". Physical Review Letters. 112 (24): 241101. arXiv:1403.3985. Bibcode:2014PhRvL.112x1101B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101. PMID 24996078. S2CID 22780831.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
^ "BICEP2 News | Not Even Wrong".
^ Overbye, Dennis (June 19, 2014). "Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim". New York Times. Retrieved June 20, 2014.
^ Amos, Jonathan (June 19, 2014). "Cosmic inflation: Confidence lowered for Big Bang signal". BBC News. Retrieved June 20, 2014.
^ Abbott, B. P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T. D.; Abernathy, M. R.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P. (2016-02-11). "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger". Physical Review Letters. 116 (6): 061102. arXiv:1602.03837. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116f1102A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 26918975. S2CID 124959784.
^ Castelvecchi, Davide; Witze, Alexandra (11 February 2016). "Einstein's gravitational waves found at last". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19361. S2CID 182916902. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
^ Blum, Alexander; Lalli, Roberto; Renn, Jürgen (12 February 2016). "The long road towards evidence". Max Planck Society. Retrieved 15 February 2016.
^ Abbott, B. P.; et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (15 June 2016). "GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence". Physical Review Letters. 116 (24): 241103. arXiv:1606.04855. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116x1103A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103. PMID 27367379. S2CID 118651851.
^ Commissariat, Tushna (15 June 2016). "LIGO detects second black-hole merger". Physics World. Institute of Physics. Retrieved 15 June 2016.
^ "First-ever Image of a Black Hole Published by the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration". eventhorizontelescope.org. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
^ "The first picture of a black hole opens a new era of astrophysics". Science News. 2019-04-10. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
^ "How Does the Event Horizon Telescope Work?". Sky & Telescope. 2019-04-15. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
^ University of Geneva (10 March 2020). "Solved: The mystery of the expansion of the universe". Phys.org. Retrieved 10 March 2020.
^ Lombriser, Lucas (10 April 2020). "Consistency of the local Hubble constant with the cosmic microwave background". Physics Letters B. 803: 135303. arXiv:1906.12347. Bibcode:2020PhLB..80335303L. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135303. S2CID 195750638.
^ "Rethinking cosmology: Universe expansion may not be uniform (Update)". phys.org. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
^ "Nasa study challenges one of our most basic ideas about the universe". The Independent. 8 April 2020. Archived from the original on 2022-05-07. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
^ "Parts of the universe may be expanding faster than others". New Atlas. 9 April 2020. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
^ "Doubts about basic assumption for the universe". EurekAlert!. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
^ Migkas, K.; Schellenberger, G.; Reiprich, T. H.; Pacaud, F.; Ramos-Ceja, M. E.; Lovisari, L. (8 April 2020). "Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the LX–T scaling relation". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 636: A15. arXiv:2004.03305. Bibcode:2020A&A...636A..15M. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936602. ISSN 0004-6361. S2CID 215238834. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
^ "The laws of physics may break down at the edge of the universe". Futurism. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
^ "New findings suggest laws of nature 'downright weird,' not as constant as previously thought". phys.org. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
^ Field, David (28 April 2020). "New Tests Suggest a Fundamental Constant of Physics Isn't The Same Across The Universe". ScienceAlert.com. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
^ Wilczynska, Michael R.; Webb, John K.; Bainbridge, Matthew; Barrow, John D.; Bosman, Sarah E. I.; Carswell, Robert F.; Dąbrowski, Mariusz P.; Dumont, Vincent; Lee, Chung-Chi; Leite, Ana Catarina; Leszczyńska, Katarzyna; Liske, Jochen; Marosek, Konrad; Martins, Carlos J. A. P.; Milaković, Dinko; Molaro, Paolo; Pasquini, Luca (1 April 2020). "Four direct measurements of the fine-structure constant 13 billion years ago". Science Advances. 6 (17): eaay9672. arXiv:2003.07627. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.9672W. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay9672. PMC 7182409. PMID 32426462.

Bibliography

Bunch, Bryan, and Alexander Hellemans, The History of Science and Technology: A Browser's Guide to the Great Discoveries, Inventions, and the People Who Made Them from the Dawn of Time to Today. ISBN 0-618-22123-9
P. de Bernardis et al., astro-ph/0004404, Nature 404 (2000) 955–959.
Horowitz, Wayne (1998). Mesopotamian cosmic geography. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-0-931464-99-7.
P. Mauskopf et al., astro-ph/9911444, Astrophys. J. 536 (2000) L59–L62.
A. Melchiorri et al., astro-ph/9911445, Astrophys. J. 536 (2000) L63–L66.
A. Readhead et al., Polarization observations with the Cosmic Background Imager, Science 306 (2004), 836–844.

[1] Horowitz (1998), p. xii

[2] This is a matter of debate:
Cornford, F. M. (1934). "Innumerable Worlds in Presocratic Philosophy". The Classical Quarterly. 28 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1017/S0009838800009897. ISSN 1471-6844. S2CID 170168443.

Curd, Patricia; Graham, Daniel W. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 239–41. ISBN 978-0-19-972244-0.

Gregory, Andrew (2016). "7 Anaximander: One Cosmos or Many?". Anaximander: A Re-assessment. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 121–142. ISBN 978-1472506252.

[3] Cornford, F. M. (1934). "Innumerable Worlds in Presocratic Philosophy". The Classical Quarterly. 28 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1017/S0009838800009897. ISSN 1471-6844. S2CID 170168443.

[4] Curd, Patricia; Graham, Daniel W. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 239–41. ISBN 978-0-19-972244-0.

[5] Gregory, Andrew (2016). "7 Anaximander: One Cosmos or Many?". Anaximander: A Re-assessment. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 121–142. ISBN 978-1472506252.

[3] 
Siegfried, Tom. "Long Live the Multiverse!". Scientific American.

Siegfried, Tom (2019). "Aristotle versus the Atomists". The number of the heavens : a history of the multiverse and the quest to understand the cosmos. Harvard. ISBN 978-0674975880.

[7] Siegfried, Tom. "Long Live the Multiverse!". Scientific American.

[8] Siegfried, Tom (2019). "Aristotle versus the Atomists". The number of the heavens : a history of the multiverse and the quest to understand the cosmos. Harvard. ISBN 978-0674975880.

[4] "there are innumerable worlds of different sizes. In some there is neither sun nor moon, in others they are larger than in ours and others have more than one. These worlds are at irregular distances, more in one direction and less in another, and some are flourishing, others declining. Here they come into being, there they die, and they are destroyed by collision with one another. Some of the worlds have no animal or vegetable life nor any water."
Guthrie, W. K. C.; Guthrie, William Keith Chambers (1962). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 2, The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 404–06. ISBN 978-0-521-29421-8.

Vamvacas, Constantine J. (2009). The Founders of Western Thought – The Presocratics: A diachronic parallelism between Presocratic Thought and Philosophy and the Natural Sciences. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 219–20. ISBN 978-1-4020-9791-1.

[10] Guthrie, W. K. C.; Guthrie, William Keith Chambers (1962). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 2, The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 404–06. ISBN 978-0-521-29421-8.

[11] Vamvacas, Constantine J. (2009). The Founders of Western Thought – The Presocratics: A diachronic parallelism between Presocratic Thought and Philosophy and the Natural Sciences. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 219–20. ISBN 978-1-4020-9791-1.

[5] "Ancient Greek Astronomy and Cosmology | Modeling the Cosmos | Articles and Essays | Finding Our Place in the Cosmos: From Galileo to Sagan and Beyond | Digital Collections | Library of Congress". Library of Congress. Washington, DC.

[6] Blakemore, Erin. "Christopher Columbus Never Set Out to Prove the Earth was Round". History.com.

[7] Aristotle, On the Heavens, ii, 13

[8] "A column of stone", Aetius reports in De Fide (III, 7, 1), or "similar to a pillar-shaped stone", pseudo-Plutarch (III, 10).

[9] Sider, D. (1973). "Anaxagoras on the Size of the Sun". Classical Philology. 68 (2): 128–129. doi:10.1086/365951. JSTOR 269068. S2CID 161940013.

[10] In Refutation, it is reported that the circle of the Sun is twenty-seven times bigger than the Moon.

[11] Aetius, De Fide (II, 15, 6)

[12] Most of Anaximander's model of the Universe comes from pseudo-Plutarch (II, 20–28):
"[The Sun] is a circle twenty-eight times as big as the Earth, with the outline similar to that of a fire-filled chariot wheel, on which appears a mouth in certain places and through which it exposes its fire, as through the hole on a flute. [...] the Sun is equal to the Earth, but the circle on which it breathes and on which it's borne is twenty-seven times as big as the whole earth. [...] [The eclipse] is when the mouth from which comes the fire heat is closed. [...] [The Moon] is a circle nineteen times as big as the whole earth, all filled with fire, like that of the Sun".

[13] Laërtius, Diogenes (1925). "Others: Parmenides" . Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Vol. 2:9. Translated by Hicks, Robert Drew (Two volume ed.). Loeb Classical Library.

[14] Thurston, Hugh (1994). Early astronomy. New York: Springer-Verlag New York. p. 111. ISBN 0-387-94107-X.

[Dreyer-15] Dreyer, John Louis Emil (1906). History of the planetary systems from Thales to Kepler. p. 42. To complete the number ten, Philolaus created the antichthon, or counter-earth. This tenth planet is always invisible to us, because it is between us and the central fire and always keeps pace with the Earth.

[16] Pedersen, Olaf (1993). Early physics and astronomy. A historical introduction. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-40340-5.

[17] "The components from which he made the soul and the way in which he made it were as follows: In between the Being that is indivisible and always changeless, and the one that is divisible and comes to be in the corporeal realm, he mixed a third, intermediate form of being, derived from the other two. Similarly, he made a mixture of the Same, and then one of the Different, in between their indivisible and their corporeal, divisible counterparts. And he took the three mixtures and mixed them together to make a uniform mixture, forcing the Different, which was hard to mix, into conformity with the Same. Now when he had mixed these two with Being, and from the three had made a single mixture, he redivided the whole mixture into as many parts as his task required, each part remaining a mixture of the Same, the Different and Being." (35a-b), translation Donald J. Zeyl

[18] Plato, Timaeus, 36c

[19] Plato, Timaeus, 36d

[20] Plato, Timaeus, 39d

[21] Encyclopædia Britannica (2019). "heliocentrism | Definition, History, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica.

[22] Yavetz, Ido (February 1998). "On the Homocentric Spheres of Eudoxus". Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 52 (3): 222–225. Bibcode:1998AHES...52..222Y. doi:10.1007/s004070050017. JSTOR 41134047. S2CID 121186044.

[23] Crowe, Michael (2001). Theories of the World from Antiquity to the Copernican Revolution. Mineola, NY: Dover. p. 23. ISBN 0-486-41444-2.

[24] De caelo, 297b31–298a10

[25] Easterling, H (1961). "Homocentric Spheres in De Caelo". Phronesis. 6 (2): 138–141. doi:10.1163/156852861x00161. JSTOR 4181694.

[26] Thurston, Hugh (1994). Early astronomy. New York: Springer-Verlag New York. p. 118. ISBN 0-387-94107-X.

[27] Sorabji, Richard (2005). The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: Physics. Cornell University Press. p. 175. ISBN 978-0-8014-8988-4.

[1908DeMundo-28] Aristotle; Forster, E. S. (Edward Seymour); Dobson, J. F. (John Frederic) (1914). De Mundo. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. p. 2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[29] Simplicius (2003). "Physics 2". On Aristotle's. Translated by Fleet, Barries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 48.

[30] Eastwood, Bruce (1992). "Heraclides and Heliocentrism: Texts, Diagrams, and Interpretations". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 23 (4): 253. Bibcode:1992JHA....23..233E. doi:10.1177/002182869202300401. S2CID 118643709.

[31] D., J. L. E. (July 1913). "Aristarchus of Samos: The Ancient Copernicus". Nature. 91 (2281): 499–500. doi:10.1038/091499a0. ISSN 1476-4687.

[32] "Aristarchus of Samos (310-230 BC) | High Altitude Observatory". www2.hao.ucar.edu. Retrieved 2022-06-30.

[33] Carrol, Bradley and Ostlie, Dale, An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, 2007. pp. 4

[34] Russo, Lucio (2004). The forgotten revolution : how science was born in 300 BC and why it had to be reborn. Berlin: Springer. p. 68. ISBN 3-540-20396-6. OCLC 52945835.

[35] G. J. Toomer, "Hipparchus on the distances of the sun and moon," Archive for History of Exact Sciences 14 (1974), 126–142.

[36] Alexander Jones "Ptolemy in Perspective: Use and Criticism of his Work from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century, Springer, 2010, p.36.

[37] "Mahattattva, Mahat-tattva: 5 definitions". Wisdom Library. February 10, 2021. Mahattattva (महत्तत्त्व) or simply Mahat refers to a primordial principle of the nature of both pradhāna and puruṣa, according to the 10th century Saurapurāṇa: one of the various Upapurāṇas depicting Śaivism.—[...] From the disturbed prakṛti and the puruṣa sprang up the seed of mahat, which is of the nature of both pradhāna and puruṣa. The mahattattva is then covered by the pradhāna and being so covered it differentiates itself as the sāttvika, rājasa and tāmasa-mahat. The pradhāna covers the mahat just as a seed is covered by the skin. Being so covered there spring from the three fold mahat the threefold ahaṃkāra called vaikārika, taijasa and bhūtādi or tāmasa.

[38] Gupta, S. V. (2010). "Ch. 1.2.4 Time Measurements". In Hull, Robert; Osgood, Richard M. Jr.; Parisi, Jurgen; Warlimont, Hans (eds.). Units of Measurement: Past, Present and Future. International System of Units. Springer Series in Materials Science: 122. Springer. pp. 7–8. ISBN 9783642007378.

[39] Penprase, Bryan E. (2017). The Power of Stars (2nd ed.). Springer. p. 182. ISBN 9783319525976.

[40] Johnson, W.J. (2009). A Dictionary of Hinduism. Oxford University Press. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-19-861025-0.

[41] Fernandez, Elizabeth. "The Multiverse And Eastern Philosophy". Forbes.

[42] 
Zimmer, Heinrich Robert (2018). Myths and Symbols in Indian Art and Civilization. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-21201-2.

Penprase, Bryan E. (2017). The Power of Stars. Springer. p. 137. ISBN 978-3-319-52597-6.

Campbell, Joseph (2015). Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks, Eranos 3: Man and Time. Princeton University Press. p. 176. ISBN 978-1-4008-7485-9.

Henderson, Joseph Lewis; Oakes, Maud (1990). The Wisdom of the Serpent: The Myths of Death, Rebirth, and Resurrection. Princeton University Press. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-691-02064-8.

[50] Zimmer, Heinrich Robert (2018). Myths and Symbols in Indian Art and Civilization. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-21201-2.

[51] Penprase, Bryan E. (2017). The Power of Stars. Springer. p. 137. ISBN 978-3-319-52597-6.

[52] Campbell, Joseph (2015). Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks, Eranos 3: Man and Time. Princeton University Press. p. 176. ISBN 978-1-4008-7485-9.

[53] Henderson, Joseph Lewis; Oakes, Maud (1990). The Wisdom of the Serpent: The Myths of Death, Rebirth, and Resurrection. Princeton University Press. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-691-02064-8.

[43] North, John (1995). The Norton History of Astronomy and Cosmology. New York: W.W.Norton & Company, Inc. p. 115. ISBN 0-393-03656-1.

[44] s, prudence (2011-01-01), "Ptolemy", Dictionary of African Biography, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acref/9780195382075.001.0001/acref-9780195382075-e-1700, ISBN 978-0-19-538207-5, retrieved 2022-11-09

[45] Swerdlow, N. M. (February 2021). "The Almagest in the Manner of Euclid". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 52 (1): 104–107. doi:10.1177/0021828620977214. ISSN 0021-8286.

[46] Jackson, Roger; Makransky, John (2013). Buddhist Theology: Critical Reflections by Contemporary Buddhist Scholars. Routledge. p. 118. ISBN 978-1-136-83012-9.

[47] Reat, N. Ross; Perry, Edmund F. (1991). A World Theology: The Central Spiritual Reality of Humankind. Cambridge University Press. p. 112. ISBN 978-0-521-33159-3.

[48] India, Digital Branding Learners (2019-01-01). "Aryabhatta and the great Indian Mathematicians". Learners India.

[49] Bruce S. Eastwood, Ordering the Heavens: Roman Astronomy and Cosmology in the Carolingian Renaissance (Leiden: Brill, 2007), pp. 238-9.

[50] Adi Setia (2004). "Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi on Physics and the Nature of the Physical World: A Preliminary Survey". Islam & Science. 2. Archived from the original on 2012-07-10. Retrieved 2010-03-02.

[51] Kennedy, E. S. (1986-06-01). "The Astronomy of Levi ben Gerson (1288–1344): A Critical Edition of Chapters 1–20 with Translation and Commentary. Levi ben Gerson, Bernard R. Goldstein". Isis. 77 (2): 371–372. doi:10.1086/354184. ISSN 0021-1753.

[52] Kirschner, Stefan (2021), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), "Nicole Oresme", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2022-11-09

[53] "Episode 11: The Legacy of Ptolemy's Almagest". www.aip.org. 2022-09-28. Retrieved 2022-11-09.

[54] Misner, Thorne and Wheeler

[55] "Nicolaus Copernicus - University of Bologna". www.unibo.it. Retrieved 2022-11-09.

[56] Hellyer, Marcus, ed. (2008). The Scientific Revolution: The Essential Readings. Blackwell Essential Readings in History. Vol. 7. John Wiley & Sons. p. 63. ISBN 9780470754771. The Puritan Thomas Digges (1546–1595?) was the earliest Englishman to offer a defense of the Copernican theory. ... Accompanying Digges's account is a diagram of the universe portraying the heliocentric system surrounded by the orb of fixed stars, described by Digges as infinitely extended in all dimensions.

[57] Bruno, Giordano. "Third Dialogue". On the infinite universe and worlds. Archived from the original on 27 April 2012.

[58] Gilbert, William (1893). "Book 6, Chapter III". De Magnete. Translated by Mottelay, P. Fleury. (Facsimile). New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-26761-X.

[59] Taton, René; Wilson, Curtis (1989). Planetary astronomy from the Renaissance to the rise of astrophysics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-24254-1. OCLC 769917781.

[60] Galileo Galilei, Sidereus Nuncius (Venice, (Italy): Thomas Baglioni, 1610), pages 15 and 16. Archived March 16, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
English translation: Galileo Galilei with Edward Stafford Carlos, trans., The Sidereal Messenger (London: Rivingtons, 1880), pages 42 and 43. Archived December 2, 2012, at the Wayback Machine

[61] Christian Frisch, ed., Joannis Kepleri Astronomi Opera Omnia, vol. 6 (Frankfurt-am-Main, (Germany): Heyder & Zimmer, 1866), page 361.)

[62] Bartusiak, Marcia (2004). Archives of the universe : a treasury of astronomy's historic works of discovery (1st ed.). New York: Pantheon Books. ISBN 0-375-42170-X. OCLC 54966424.

[63] Otto Neugebauer (1975). A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. Birkhäuser. p. 1084. ISBN 978-3-540-06995-9.

[64] Bradley, James (1727–1728). "A Letter from the Reverend Mr. James Bradley Savilian Professor of Astronomy at Oxford, and F.R.S. to Dr.Edmond Halley Astronom. Reg. &c. Giving an Account of a New Discovered Motion of the Fix'd Stars". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 35 (406): 637–661. Bibcode:1727RSPT...35..637B. doi:10.1098/rstl.1727.0064.

[65] "Original Messier Catalog of 1781". Students for the Exploration and Development of Space. 10 November 2007.

[Berendzen-66] Berendzen, Richard (1975). "Geocentric to heliocentric to galactocentric to acentric: the continuing assault to the egocentric". Vistas in Astronomy. 17 (1): 65–83. Bibcode:1975VA.....17...65B. doi:10.1016/0083-6656(75)90049-5.

[67] Owen, T. C. (2001) "Solar system: origin of the solar system", Encyclopædia Britannica, Deluxe CDROM edition

[Henderson1839-68] Henderson, Thomas (1839). "On the Parallax of α Centauri". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 4 (19): 168–170. Bibcode:1839MNRAS...4..168H. doi:10.1093/mnras/4.19.168.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

[69] Bessel, F. W. (1838b). "On the parallax of 61 Cygni". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 4 (17): 152–161. Bibcode:1838MNRAS...4..152B. doi:10.1093/mnras/4.17.152.

[70] Pohle, J. (1913). "Angelo Secchi" . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. [...][his] theory of the unity of the world and of the identity of the fixed stars and the sun received most profound scientific demonstration and confirmation.

[71] Michelson, Albert A.; Morley, Edward W. (1887). "On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether" . American Journal of Science. 34 (203): 333–345. Bibcode:1887AmJS...34..333M. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-34.203.333. S2CID 124333204.

[72] Thomson, William (1862). "On the Age of the Sun's Heat". Macmillan's Magazine. Vol. 5. pp. 388–393.

[73] England, P.; Molnar, P.; Righter, F. (January 2007). "John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics". GSA Today. Vol. 17, no. 1. pp. 4–9. doi:10.1130/GSAT01701A.1.

[74] Glass, I.S. (2008). Proxima, the Nearest Star (other than the Sun). Cape Town: Mons Mensa.

[75] Dyson, F.W.; Eddington, A.S.; Davidson, C.R. (1920). "A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun's Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Solar eclipse of May 29, 1919". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 220 (571–581): 291–333. Bibcode:1920RSPTA.220..291D. doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009.

[76] Evans, Ben (April 25, 2020). "The Great Debate - 100 years later". Astronomy.com. Retrieved 2020-09-10.

[77] Karl Jansky (Oct 1933). "Electrical Disturbances Apparently of Extraterrestrial Origin". Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers. 21 (10): 1387–1398. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1933.227458. See also Karl Jansky (Jul 8, 1933). "Radio Waves from Outside the Solar System" (PDF). Nature. 132 (3323): 66. doi:10.1038/132066a0. S2CID 4063838.

[78] Bethe, H.; Critchfield, C. (1938). "On the Formation of Deuterons by Proton Combination". Physical Review. 54 (10): 862. Bibcode:1938PhRv...54Q.862B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.54.862.2.

[79] Bethe, H. (1939). "Energy Production in Stars". Physical Review. 55 (1): 434–456. Bibcode:1939PhRv...55..434B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.55.434. PMID 17835673. S2CID 36146598.

[80] "STS-31". NASA. Archived from the original on August 15, 2011. Retrieved April 26, 2008.

[81] Wolszczan, A.; Frail, D. (1992). "A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12". Nature. 355 (6356): 145–147. Bibcode:1992Natur.355..145W. doi:10.1038/355145a0. S2CID 4260368.

[82] Mayor, Michael; Queloz, Didier (1995). "A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star". Nature. 378 (6555): 355–359. Bibcode:1995Natur.378..355M. doi:10.1038/378355a0. S2CID 4339201.

[83] "Voyager 1 Sees Solar Wind Decline". NASA. December 13, 2010. Archived from the original on June 14, 2011. Retrieved September 16, 2013.

[BICEP2-2014-84] Staff (March 17, 2014). "BICEP2 2014 Results Release". National Science Foundation. Retrieved March 18, 2014.

[NASA-20140317-85] Clavin, Whitney (March 17, 2014). "NASA Technology Views Birth of the Universe". NASA. Retrieved March 17, 2014.

[NYT-20140317-86] Overbye, Dennis (March 17, 2014). "Space Ripples Reveal Big Bang's Smoking Gun". The New York Times. Retrieved March 17, 2014.

[NYT-20140324-87] Overbye, Dennis (March 24, 2014). "Ripples From the Big Bang". New York Times. Retrieved March 24, 2014.

[PRL-20140619-88] Ade, P.A.R.; BICEP2 Collaboration (June 19, 2014). "Detection of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2". Physical Review Letters. 112 (24): 241101. arXiv:1403.3985. Bibcode:2014PhRvL.112x1101B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101. PMID 24996078. S2CID 22780831.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

[89] "BICEP2 News | Not Even Wrong".

[NYT-20140619-90] Overbye, Dennis (June 19, 2014). "Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim". New York Times. Retrieved June 20, 2014.

[BBC-20140619-91] Amos, Jonathan (June 19, 2014). "Cosmic inflation: Confidence lowered for Big Bang signal". BBC News. Retrieved June 20, 2014.

[92] Abbott, B. P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T. D.; Abernathy, M. R.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P. (2016-02-11). "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger". Physical Review Letters. 116 (6): 061102. arXiv:1602.03837. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116f1102A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 26918975. S2CID 124959784.

[Nature_11Feb16-93] Castelvecchi, Davide; Witze, Alexandra (11 February 2016). "Einstein's gravitational waves found at last". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19361. S2CID 182916902. Retrieved 11 February 2016.

[renn-94] Blum, Alexander; Lalli, Roberto; Renn, Jürgen (12 February 2016). "The long road towards evidence". Max Planck Society. Retrieved 15 February 2016.

[PRL-20160615-95] Abbott, B. P.; et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (15 June 2016). "GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence". Physical Review Letters. 116 (24): 241103. arXiv:1606.04855. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116x1103A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103. PMID 27367379. S2CID 118651851.

[96] Commissariat, Tushna (15 June 2016). "LIGO detects second black-hole merger". Physics World. Institute of Physics. Retrieved 15 June 2016.

[97] "First-ever Image of a Black Hole Published by the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration". eventhorizontelescope.org. Retrieved 2020-03-30.

[98] "The first picture of a black hole opens a new era of astrophysics". Science News. 2019-04-10. Retrieved 2020-03-30.

[99] "How Does the Event Horizon Telescope Work?". Sky & Telescope. 2019-04-15. Retrieved 2020-03-30.

[PHYS-20200310-100] University of Geneva (10 March 2020). "Solved: The mystery of the expansion of the universe". Phys.org. Retrieved 10 March 2020.

[PLB-20200410-101] Lombriser, Lucas (10 April 2020). "Consistency of the local Hubble constant with the cosmic microwave background". Physics Letters B. 803: 135303. arXiv:1906.12347. Bibcode:2020PhLB..80335303L. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135303. S2CID 195750638.

[102] "Rethinking cosmology: Universe expansion may not be uniform (Update)". phys.org. Retrieved 15 May 2020.

[103] "Nasa study challenges one of our most basic ideas about the universe". The Independent. 8 April 2020. Archived from the original on 2022-05-07. Retrieved 23 May 2020.

[104] "Parts of the universe may be expanding faster than others". New Atlas. 9 April 2020. Retrieved 23 May 2020.

[105] "Doubts about basic assumption for the universe". EurekAlert!. Retrieved 23 May 2020.

[106] Migkas, K.; Schellenberger, G.; Reiprich, T. H.; Pacaud, F.; Ramos-Ceja, M. E.; Lovisari, L. (8 April 2020). "Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the LX–T scaling relation". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 636: A15. arXiv:2004.03305. Bibcode:2020A&A...636A..15M. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936602. ISSN 0004-6361. S2CID 215238834. Retrieved 15 May 2020.

[107] "The laws of physics may break down at the edge of the universe". Futurism. Retrieved 17 May 2020.

[108] "New findings suggest laws of nature 'downright weird,' not as constant as previously thought". phys.org. Retrieved 17 May 2020.

[SA-20200428-109] Field, David (28 April 2020). "New Tests Suggest a Fundamental Constant of Physics Isn't The Same Across The Universe". ScienceAlert.com. Retrieved 29 April 2020.

[110] Wilczynska, Michael R.; Webb, John K.; Bainbridge, Matthew; Barrow, John D.; Bosman, Sarah E. I.; Carswell, Robert F.; Dąbrowski, Mariusz P.; Dumont, Vincent; Lee, Chung-Chi; Leite, Ana Catarina; Leszczyńska, Katarzyna; Liske, Jochen; Marosek, Konrad; Martins, Carlos J. A. P.; Milaković, Dinko; Molaro, Paolo; Pasquini, Luca (1 April 2020). "Four direct measurements of the fine-structure constant 13 billion years ago". Science Advances. 6 (17): eaay9672. arXiv:2003.07627. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.9672W. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay9672. PMC 7182409. PMID 32426462.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

[42]

[43]

[44]

[45]

[46]

[47]

[48]

[49]

[50]

[51]

[52]

[53]

[54]

[55]

[56]

[57]

[58]

[59]

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64]

[65]

[66]

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

[71]

[72]

[73]

[74]

[75]

[76]

[77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84]

[85]

[86]

[87]

[88]

[89]

[90]

[91]

[92]

[93]

[94]

[95]

[96]

[97]

[98]

[99]

[100]

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 * '''1897'''&nbsp;– [[William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin]], based on the thermal radiation rate and the [[Kelvin–Helmholtz mechanism|gravitational contraction]] forces, argues the age of the Sun to be no more than 20 million years – unless some energy source beyond what was then known was found.<ref>{{cite magazine |last1=Thomson |first=William |year=1862 |title=On the Age of the Sun's Heat |url=https://zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/on_the_age_of_the_suns_heat.html |magazine=Macmillan's Magazine |volume=5 |pages=388–393}}</ref>
-==1900–1949==
+==1901–1950==
 * '''1904'''&nbsp;– [[Ernest Rutherford]] argues, in a lecture attended by Kelvin, that [[radioactive decay]] releases heat, providing the unknown energy source Kelvin had suggested, and ultimately leading to [[radiometric dating]] of rocks which reveals ages of billions of years for the Solar System bodies, hence the Sun and all the stars.<ref>{{cite magazine |author1=England, P. |author2=Molnar, P. |author3=Righter, F. |date=January 2007 |title=John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics |magazine=GSA Today |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=4–9 |doi=10.1130/GSAT01701A.1}}</ref>
 * '''1905'''&nbsp;– [[Albert Einstein]] publishes the [[Special relativity|Special Theory of Relativity]], positing that space and time are not separate continua.
@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 * '''1948'''&nbsp;– [[George Gamow]] predicts the existence of the [[cosmic microwave background radiation]] by considering the behavior of primordial radiation in an expanding universe.
-==1950–2000==
+==1951–2000==
 * '''1950'''&nbsp;– [[Fred Hoyle]] coins the term "Big Bang", saying that it was not derisive; it was just a striking image meant to highlight the difference between that and the Steady-State model.
 * '''1961'''&nbsp;– [[Robert Dicke]] argues that [[carbon]]-based [[life]] can only arise when the gravitational force is small, because this is when burning stars exist; first use of the weak [[anthropic principle]]
@@ Line 138: / Line 138: @@
 * '''1990'''&nbsp;– Preliminary results from [[NASA]]'s [[Cosmic Background Explorer|COBE]] mission confirm the [[cosmic microwave background radiation]] has a [[blackbody]] spectrum to an astonishing one part in 10<sup>5</sup> precision, thus eliminating the possibility of an integrated starlight model proposed for the background by steady state enthusiasts.
 * '''1992'''&nbsp;– Further [[Cosmic Background Explorer|COBE]] measurements discover the very small [[anisotropy]] of the [[cosmic microwave background]], providing a "baby picture" of the seeds of large-scale structure when the universe was around 1/1100th of its present size and 380,000 years old.
+* '''1992'''&nbsp;– First [[planetary system]] beyond the Solar System detected, around the [[pulsar]] [[PSR B1257+12]].<ref>{{cite journal |bibcode=1992Natur.355..145W |author=Wolszczan, A. |author2=Frail, D. |title=A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12 |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=355 |issue=6356 |pages=145–147 |date=1992 |doi=10.1038/355145a0 |s2cid=4260368}}</ref>
+* '''1995'''&nbsp;– The first planet around a Sun-like star is discovered, in orbit around the star [[51 Pegasi]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mayor |first1=Michael |last2=Queloz |first2=Didier |title=A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |date=1995 |volume=378 |issue=6555 |pages=355–359 |doi=10.1038/378355a0 |bibcode = 1995Natur.378..355M |s2cid=4339201 }}</ref>
 * '''1996'''&nbsp;– The first [[Hubble Deep Field]] is released, providing a clear view of very distant galaxies when the universe was around one-third of its present age.
 * '''1998'''&nbsp;– Controversial evidence for the [[fine-structure constant]] varying over the lifetime of the universe is first published.
@@ Line 143: / Line 145: @@
 * '''1999'''&nbsp;– Measurements of the [[cosmic microwave background radiation]] with finer resolution than COBE, (most notably by the [[BOOMERanG experiment]] see Mauskopf et al., 1999, Melchiorri et al., 1999, de Bernardis et al. 2000) provide evidence for oscillations (the first acoustic peak) in the [[anisotropy]] angular spectrum, as expected in the standard model of cosmological structure formation. The angular position of this peak indicates that the geometry of the universe is close to flat.
-==Since 2000==
+==2001–present==
 * '''2001'''&nbsp;– The [[2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey]] (2dF) by an Australian/British team gave strong evidence that the matter density is near 25% of critical density. Together with the CMB results for a flat universe, this provides independent evidence for a [[cosmological constant]] or similar [[dark energy]].
 * '''2002'''&nbsp;– The [[Cosmic Background Imager]] (CBI) in [[Chile]] obtained images of the cosmic microwave background radiation with the highest angular resolution of 4 arc minutes. It also obtained the anisotropy spectrum at high-resolution not covered before up to l ~ 3000. It found a slight excess in power at high-resolution (l > 2500) not yet completely explained, the so-called "CBI-excess".
@@ Line 149: / Line 151: @@
 * '''2003'''&nbsp;– The [[Sloan Great Wall]] is discovered.
 * '''2004'''&nbsp;– The Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI) first obtained the E-mode polarization spectrum of the cosmic microwave background radiation.
+* '''2004'''&nbsp;– ''[[Voyager 1]]'' sends back the first data ever obtained from within the Solar System's [[heliosheath]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/display.cfm?News_ID=36121 |title=Voyager 1 Sees Solar Wind Decline |publisher=NASA |date=December 13, 2010 |access-date=September 16, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110614073203/http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/display.cfm?News_ID=36121 |archive-date=June 14, 2011}}</ref>
 * '''2005'''&nbsp;– The [[Sloan Digital Sky Survey]] (SDSS) and [[2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey|2dF]] redshift surveys both detected the [[baryon acoustic oscillation]] feature in the galaxy distribution, a key prediction of cold [[dark matter]] models.
 * '''2006'''&nbsp;– Three-year [[WMAP]] results are released, confirming previous analysis, correcting several points, and including [[Cosmic microwave background radiation#Polarization|polarization]] data.
@@ Line 156: / Line 159: @@
 * '''2016'''&nbsp;– [[LIGO Scientific Collaboration]] and [[Virgo interferometer|Virgo Collaboration]] announce that gravitational waves were [[First observation of gravitational waves|directly detected]] by two [[LIGO]] detectors. The [[waveform]] matched the prediction of [[General relativity]] for a gravitational wave emanating from the inward spiral and merger of a pair of [[black hole]]s of around 36 and 29 [[solar mass]]es and the subsequent "ringdown" of the single resulting black hole.<ref>{{Cite journal|title = Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger|journal = [[Physical Review Letters]]|date = 2016-02-11|issn = 0031-9007|volume = 116|issue = 6|doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102|language = en|first1 = B. P.|last1 = Abbott|first2 = R.|last2 = Abbott|first3 = T. D.|last3 = Abbott|first4 = M. R.|last4 = Abernathy|first5 = F.|last5 = Acernese|first6 = K.|last6 = Ackley|first7 = C.|last7 = Adams|first8 = T.|last8 = Adams|first9 = P.|last9 = Addesso|arxiv = 1602.03837 |bibcode = 2016PhRvL.116f1102A|pmid=26918975|pages=061102|s2cid = 124959784}}</ref><ref name="Nature_11Feb16">{{cite journal |title=Einstein's gravitational waves found at last |journal=Nature News |url=http://www.nature.com/news/einstein-s-gravitational-waves-found-at-last-1.19361 |date=11 February 2016 |last1=Castelvecchi |first1=Davide |last2=Witze |first2=Alexandra |doi=10.1038/nature.2016.19361 |s2cid=182916902 |access-date=11 February 2016}}</ref><ref name ="renn">{{cite web |last1=Blum |first1=Alexander |last2=Lalli |first2=Roberto |last3=Renn |first3=Jürgen |author-link3=Jürgen Renn |title=The long road towards evidence |url=http://www.mpg.de/9966773/background |work=[[Max Planck Society]] |date=12 February 2016 |access-date=15 February 2016}}</ref> The [[GW151226|second detection]] verified that GW150914 is not a fluke, thus opens entire new branch in astrophysics, [[gravitational-wave astronomy]].<ref name="PRL-20160615" >{{Cite journal| collaboration=LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration| last=Abbott| first=B. P.| date=15 June 2016| title=GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence| journal=Physical Review Letters| volume= 116| issue= 24| pages=241103|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103| pmid=27367379|arxiv = 1606.04855 |bibcode = 2016PhRvL.116x1103A | s2cid=118651851}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web| url=http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/jun/15/ligo-detects-second-black-hole-merger| title=LIGO detects second black-hole merger |date=15 June 2016| first=Tushna| last=Commissariat| website=[[Physics World]]| publisher= [[Institute of Physics]]| access-date=15 June 2016}}</ref>
 * '''2019'''&nbsp;– <!--- More informative details could be added here. --->[[Event Horizon Telescope|The Event Horizon Telescope]] Collaboration publishes the image of the black hole at the center of the [[Messier 87|M87 Galaxy]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://eventhorizontelescope.org/blog/first-ever-image-black-hole-published-event-horizon-telescope-collaboration|title=First-ever Image of a Black Hole Published by the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration|website=eventhorizontelescope.org|language=en|access-date=2020-03-30}}</ref> This is the first time [[astronomer]]s have ever captured an image of a [[black hole]], which once again proves the existence of black holes and thus helps verify [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s [[General relativity|general theory of relativity]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sciencenews.org/article/black-hole-first-picture-event-horizon-telescope|title=The first picture of a black hole opens a new era of astrophysics|date=2019-04-10|website=Science News|language=en-US|access-date=2020-03-30}}</ref> This was done by utilising [[very-long-baseline interferometry]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-blogs/black-hole-files/how-does-very-long-baseline-interferometry-work/|title=How Does the Event Horizon Telescope Work?|date=2019-04-15|website=Sky & Telescope|language=en-US|access-date=2020-03-30}}</ref>
-* '''2020'''&nbsp;— Physicist [[Lucas Lombriser]] of the [[University of Geneva]] presents a possible way of reconciling the two significantly different determinations of the [[Hubble constant]] by proposing the notion of a surrounding [[Hubble bubble (astronomy)|vast "bubble"]], 250 million light years in diameter, that is half the density of the rest of the universe.<ref name="PHYS-20200310">{{cite news |author=University of Geneva |title=Solved: The mystery of the expansion of the universe |url=https://phys.org/news/2020-03-mystery-expansion-universe.html |date=10 March 2020 |work=[[Phys.org]] |access-date=10 March 2020 |author-link=University of Geneva }}</ref><ref name="PLB-20200410">{{cite journal |last=Lombriser |first=Lucas |title=Consistency of the local Hubble constant with the cosmic microwave background |date=10 April 2020 |journal=[[Physics Letters B]] |volume=803 |pages=135303 |doi=10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135303 |arxiv=1906.12347 |bibcode=2020PhLB..80335303L |s2cid=195750638 }}</ref>
+* '''2020'''&nbsp;– Physicist [[Lucas Lombriser]] of the [[University of Geneva]] presents a possible way of reconciling the two significantly different determinations of the [[Hubble constant]] by proposing the notion of a surrounding [[Hubble bubble (astronomy)|vast "bubble"]], 250 million light years in diameter, that is half the density of the rest of the universe.<ref name="PHYS-20200310">{{cite news |author=University of Geneva |title=Solved: The mystery of the expansion of the universe |url=https://phys.org/news/2020-03-mystery-expansion-universe.html |date=10 March 2020 |work=[[Phys.org]] |access-date=10 March 2020 |author-link=University of Geneva }}</ref><ref name="PLB-20200410">{{cite journal |last=Lombriser |first=Lucas |title=Consistency of the local Hubble constant with the cosmic microwave background |date=10 April 2020 |journal=[[Physics Letters B]] |volume=803 |pages=135303 |doi=10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135303 |arxiv=1906.12347 |bibcode=2020PhLB..80335303L |s2cid=195750638 }}</ref>
-* '''2020'''&nbsp;— Scientists publish a study which suggests that the Universe is no longer [[Expansion of the Universe|expanding]] at the same rate in all directions and that therefore the widely accepted [[Isotropy#Cosmology|isotropy hypothesis]] might be wrong. While previous studies already suggested this, the study is the first to examine [[galaxy cluster]]s in X-rays and, according to Norbert Schartel, has a much greater significance. The study found a consistent and strong directional behavior of [[Hubble's law#Measured values of the Hubble constant|deviations – which have earlier been described to indicate a "crisis of cosmology" by others – of the normalization parameter A, or the Hubble constant H0]]. Beyond the potential [[cosmological]] implications, it shows that studies which assume perfect isotropy in the properties of galaxy clusters and their scaling relations can produce strongly biased results.<ref>{{cite web |title=Rethinking cosmology: Universe expansion may not be uniform (Update) |url=https://phys.org/news/2020-04-basic-assumption-universe.html |website=phys.org |access-date=15 May 2020 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Nasa study challenges one of our most basic ideas about the universe |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/universe-expanding-direction-nasa-esa-cosmology-isotropic-a9455641.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220507/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/universe-expanding-direction-nasa-esa-cosmology-isotropic-a9455641.html |archive-date=2022-05-07 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=23 May 2020 |work=The Independent |date=8 April 2020 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Parts of the universe may be expanding faster than others |url=https://newatlas.com/physics/universe-expansion-not-uniform/ |access-date=23 May 2020 |work=New Atlas |date=9 April 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Doubts about basic assumption for the universe |url=https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-04/uob-dab040820.php |access-date=23 May 2020 |work=EurekAlert! |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Migkas |first1=K. |last2=Schellenberger |first2=G. |last3=Reiprich |first3=T. H. |last4=Pacaud |first4=F. |last5=Ramos-Ceja |first5=M. E. |last6=Lovisari |first6=L. |title=Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the LX–T scaling relation |journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics |date=8 April 2020 |volume=636 |pages=A15 |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201936602 |arxiv=2004.03305 |bibcode=2020A&A...636A..15M |s2cid=215238834 |url=https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2020/04/aa36602-19/aa36602-19.html |access-date=15 May 2020 |language=en |issn=0004-6361}}</ref>
+* '''2020'''&nbsp;– Scientists publish a study which suggests that the Universe is no longer [[Expansion of the Universe|expanding]] at the same rate in all directions and that therefore the widely accepted [[Isotropy#Cosmology|isotropy hypothesis]] might be wrong. While previous studies already suggested this, the study is the first to examine [[galaxy cluster]]s in X-rays and, according to Norbert Schartel, has a much greater significance. The study found a consistent and strong directional behavior of [[Hubble's law#Measured values of the Hubble constant|deviations – which have earlier been described to indicate a "crisis of cosmology" by others – of the normalization parameter A, or the Hubble constant H0]]. Beyond the potential [[cosmological]] implications, it shows that studies which assume perfect isotropy in the properties of galaxy clusters and their scaling relations can produce strongly biased results.<ref>{{cite web |title=Rethinking cosmology: Universe expansion may not be uniform (Update) |url=https://phys.org/news/2020-04-basic-assumption-universe.html |website=phys.org |access-date=15 May 2020 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Nasa study challenges one of our most basic ideas about the universe |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/universe-expanding-direction-nasa-esa-cosmology-isotropic-a9455641.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220507/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/universe-expanding-direction-nasa-esa-cosmology-isotropic-a9455641.html |archive-date=2022-05-07 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=23 May 2020 |work=The Independent |date=8 April 2020 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Parts of the universe may be expanding faster than others |url=https://newatlas.com/physics/universe-expansion-not-uniform/ |access-date=23 May 2020 |work=New Atlas |date=9 April 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Doubts about basic assumption for the universe |url=https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-04/uob-dab040820.php |access-date=23 May 2020 |work=EurekAlert! |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Migkas |first1=K. |last2=Schellenberger |first2=G. |last3=Reiprich |first3=T. H. |last4=Pacaud |first4=F. |last5=Ramos-Ceja |first5=M. E. |last6=Lovisari |first6=L. |title=Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the LX–T scaling relation |journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics |date=8 April 2020 |volume=636 |pages=A15 |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/201936602 |arxiv=2004.03305 |bibcode=2020A&A...636A..15M |s2cid=215238834 |url=https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2020/04/aa36602-19/aa36602-19.html |access-date=15 May 2020 |language=en |issn=0004-6361}}</ref>
-* '''2020'''&nbsp;— Scientists report verifying measurements 2011–2014 via [[ULAS J1120+0641]] of what seem to be [[fine-structure constant#Potential time-variation|a spatial variation in four measurements of the fine-structure constant]], a basic physical constant used to measure [[electromagnetism]] between charged particles, which indicates that there might be directionality with varying natural constants in the Universe which would have implications for [[Physical constant#Fine-tuned universe|theories on the emergence of habitability of the Universe]] and be at odds with the widely accepted theory of constant [[natural law]]s and the standard model of [[cosmology]] which is based on an [[Isotropy|isotropic]] Universe.<ref>{{cite news |title=The laws of physics may break down at the edge of the universe |url=https://futurism.com/the-byte/laws-physics-break-down-edge-universe |access-date=17 May 2020 |work=Futurism |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=New findings suggest laws of nature 'downright weird,' not as constant as previously thought |url=https://phys.org/news/2020-04-laws-nature-downright-weird-constant.html |access-date=17 May 2020 |work=phys.org |language=en}}</ref><ref name="SA-20200428">{{cite news |last=Field |first=David |title=New Tests Suggest a Fundamental Constant of Physics Isn't The Same Across The Universe |url=https://www.sciencealert.com/new-tests-suggest-the-fundamental-forces-of-nature-aren-t-constant-across-the-universe |date=28 April 2020 |work=ScienceAlert.com |access-date=29 April 2020 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wilczynska |first1=Michael R. |last2=Webb |first2=John K. |last3=Bainbridge |first3=Matthew |last4=Barrow |first4=John D. |last5=Bosman |first5=Sarah E. I. |last6=Carswell |first6=Robert F. |last7=Dąbrowski |first7=Mariusz P. |last8=Dumont |first8=Vincent |last9=Lee |first9=Chung-Chi |last10=Leite |first10=Ana Catarina |last11=Leszczyńska |first11=Katarzyna |last12=Liske |first12=Jochen |last13=Marosek |first13=Konrad |last14=Martins |first14=Carlos J. A. P. |last15=Milaković |first15=Dinko |last16=Molaro |first16=Paolo |last17=Pasquini |first17=Luca |title=Four direct measurements of the fine-structure constant 13 billion years ago |journal=Science Advances |date=1 April 2020 |volume=6 |issue=17 |pages=eaay9672 |doi=10.1126/sciadv.aay9672 |pmc=7182409  |pmid=32426462 |arxiv=2003.07627 |bibcode=2020SciA....6.9672W |doi-access=free }}</ref>
+* '''2020'''&nbsp;– Scientists report verifying measurements 2011–2014 via [[ULAS J1120+0641]] of what seem to be [[fine-structure constant#Potential time-variation|a spatial variation in four measurements of the fine-structure constant]], a basic physical constant used to measure [[electromagnetism]] between charged particles, which indicates that there might be directionality with varying natural constants in the Universe which would have implications for [[Physical constant#Fine-tuned universe|theories on the emergence of habitability of the Universe]] and be at odds with the widely accepted theory of constant [[natural law]]s and the standard model of [[cosmology]] which is based on an [[Isotropy|isotropic]] Universe.<ref>{{cite news |title=The laws of physics may break down at the edge of the universe |url=https://futurism.com/the-byte/laws-physics-break-down-edge-universe |access-date=17 May 2020 |work=Futurism |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=New findings suggest laws of nature 'downright weird,' not as constant as previously thought |url=https://phys.org/news/2020-04-laws-nature-downright-weird-constant.html |access-date=17 May 2020 |work=phys.org |language=en}}</ref><ref name="SA-20200428">{{cite news |last=Field |first=David |title=New Tests Suggest a Fundamental Constant of Physics Isn't The Same Across The Universe |url=https://www.sciencealert.com/new-tests-suggest-the-fundamental-forces-of-nature-aren-t-constant-across-the-universe |date=28 April 2020 |work=ScienceAlert.com |access-date=29 April 2020 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wilczynska |first1=Michael R. |last2=Webb |first2=John K. |last3=Bainbridge |first3=Matthew |last4=Barrow |first4=John D. |last5=Bosman |first5=Sarah E. I. |last6=Carswell |first6=Robert F. |last7=Dąbrowski |first7=Mariusz P. |last8=Dumont |first8=Vincent |last9=Lee |first9=Chung-Chi |last10=Leite |first10=Ana Catarina |last11=Leszczyńska |first11=Katarzyna |last12=Liske |first12=Jochen |last13=Marosek |first13=Konrad |last14=Martins |first14=Carlos J. A. P. |last15=Milaković |first15=Dinko |last16=Molaro |first16=Paolo |last17=Pasquini |first17=Luca |title=Four direct measurements of the fine-structure constant 13 billion years ago |journal=Science Advances |date=1 April 2020 |volume=6 |issue=17 |pages=eaay9672 |doi=10.1126/sciadv.aay9672 |pmc=7182409  |pmid=32426462 |arxiv=2003.07627 |bibcode=2020SciA....6.9672W |doi-access=free }}</ref>
 ==See also==

v t e History of physics (timeline)
Classical physics	Astronomy timeline Electromagnetism timeline Electrical engineering Maxwell's equations Fluid mechanics timeline Aerodynamics Field theory Gravitational theory timeline Material science timeline Metamaterials Mechanics timeline Variational principles Optics Spectroscopy Thermodynamics timeline Energy Entropy Perpetual motion
Modern physics	Computational physics timeline Condensed matter timeline Superconductivity Cosmology timeline Big Bang theory General relativity tests Geophysics Nuclear physics Fission Fusion Power Weapons Quantum mechanics timeline Atoms Molecules Quantum field theory Subatomic physics timeline Special relativity timeline Lorentz transformations tests
Recent developments	Quantum information timeline Loop quantum gravity Nanotechnology String theory
On specific discoveries	Cosmic microwave background Graphene Gravitational waves Subatomic particles timeline Higgs boson Neutron Speed of light
By periods	Copernican Revolution Golden age of physics Golden age of cosmology Medieval Islamic world Astronomy Noisy intermediate-scale quantum era
By groups	Harvard Computers The Martians Oxford Calculators Via Panisperna boys Women in physics
Scientific disputes	Bohr–Einstein Chandrasekhar–Eddington Galileo affair Leibniz–Newton Joule–von Mayer Shapley–Curtis Relativity priority Special relativity General relativity Transfermium Wars
Category

Timeline of cosmological theories: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:36, 27 January 2023

Antiquity

Middle Ages

Renaissance

Enlightenment to Victorian Era

1901–1950

1951–2000

2001–present

See also

Physical cosmology

Historical development of hypotheses

Belief systems

Others

References

Bibliography