Jump to content

Talk:Freespire: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
FOSS
Miketm (talk | contribs)
m {{WPLinux|class=Start}}
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPLinux|class=Start}}
{{Linuxproject}}


=Relation to Linspire?=
=Relation to Linspire?=

Revision as of 15:57, 8 March 2007

WikiProject iconLinux Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Relation to Linspire?

So is Freespire a project of Linspire, and has it always been?--Darrelljon 12:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the RTFA article provides sufficient information to answer that question. Chris Cunningham 16:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Should SquiggleOS have a seperate article then?--Darrelljon 19:37, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It didn't really exist for long enough to generate an article's worth of material. A redirect to here mght be justified, bu that's about it. Chris Cunningham 23:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dead references

Someone at Freespire has been dropping pages. The first ref is now dead. Chris Cunningham 18:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unfair deletion

I posted brief useful instructions for how to make Freespire more secure by making sudo require a password.

It was deleted by someone who commented "not a guide book." I think the deletion was totally unfair. I've seen a lot of configuration notes and instructions on a lot of Wikipedia pages about other Linux distributions and computer programs.

Perhaps you should write something about the controversy around their root/sudo methods - in a purely factual format; then provide a reference to the discussion. --Shawn McCuan 07:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

FOSS

Does the default installation really have no proprietary software? I find that highly unlikely. Does anyone have a source? Superm401 - Talk 01:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]