Talk:King's Bench jurisdiction: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:10, 29 January 2023

United States courts and judges Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Stub‑class

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New York?

I question the assertion in the article that "Kings Bench jurisdiction" exists in the New York. I've been a practicing litigation attorney in New York for 25 years and have never heard this term used, nor do I locate reference to it in my sources.

The link supporting the sentence in question is unfortunately dead. Can anyone put his or her hands on the source? Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's Bench jurisdiction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/62TSIk5BI?url=http://www.courts.state.pa.us/NR/rdonlyres/96F816DA-D829-4485-960E-642C92E866E5/0/8395AOPCChiefCounselTestifiesonKingsBenchAuthorityasSafetyValve.pdf to http://www.courts.state.pa.us/NR/rdonlyres/96F816DA-D829-4485-960E-642C92E866E5/0/8395AOPCChiefCounselTestifiesonKingsBenchAuthorityasSafetyValve.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject United States courts and judges|class=
+}}
 {{WikiProject Law|class=Stub|importance=}}