Jump to content

Talk:Particle decay: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Peelbot (talk | contribs)
(Plugin) Added {{physics}}. using AWB
m Quarks final state may not always be up or down.
Line 7: Line 7:
|[[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|Wikipedia|right|40px]]
|[[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|Wikipedia|right|40px]]
|}
|}

== Quarks final state may not always be up or down. ==

My comment will be specifically concerning the sentence:
<blockquote>
This process continues until stable particles (electrons, or up and down quarks) are produced.
</blockquote>
which might mislead some readers into thinking that up and down quarks are the final stable state for quarks. However this is not necessarily the case theoretically. See:
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_matter]].
I suggest this can be rectified by inserting the word usually before "electrons, or up ..." to account for such exceptions.

[[User:Billyziege|Billyziege]] 20:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Billyziege

Revision as of 20:33, 8 March 2007

WikiProject iconPhysics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Did You Know An entry from Particle decay appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 30 November, 2006.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Quarks final state may not always be up or down.

My comment will be specifically concerning the sentence:

This process continues until stable particles (electrons, or up and down quarks) are produced.

which might mislead some readers into thinking that up and down quarks are the final stable state for quarks. However this is not necessarily the case theoretically. See: [[1]]. I suggest this can be rectified by inserting the word usually before "electrons, or up ..." to account for such exceptions.

Billyziege 20:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Billyziege[reply]