Jump to content

Talk:Deloitte: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Deloitte/Archives/2019. (BOT)
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Deloitte/Archives/2020. (BOT)
Line 9: Line 9:
}}
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Deloitte/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Deloitte/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}

== Family ==

It's a French name. French ancestries? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.91.51.235|87.91.51.235]] ([[User talk:87.91.51.235#top|talk]]) 05:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:See [[William Welch Deloitte]] for the ancestry of the founder. [[User:Dormskirk|Dormskirk]] ([[User talk:Dormskirk|talk]]) 09:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)


== Lead doesn't cover all important aspects ==
== Lead doesn't cover all important aspects ==

Revision as of 11:18, 2 February 2023

Template:Vital article

Lead doesn't cover all important aspects

Sorry, I tagged it but then had to go out. Se WP:LEAD. As it stands, the lead doesn't mention anything about controversies. "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents." " It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies." @Dormskirk: I hope you see my point. Right now the is too short, doesn't cover all that it should, and stretches what should be at most two paragraphs out to three. Doug Weller talk 09:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I see your point and will add a bit more on history and something on controversies in particular. Thanks for explaining. Dormskirk (talk) 09:13, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller: I have had a go at expanding the lead. I hope it is OK now. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 10:35, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dormskirk: I'm really impressed. You've done an excellent job, it's a much better lead. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller: Great. Many thanks for your kind words. Dormskirk (talk) 11:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Krekel van der Woerd Wouterse" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Krekel van der Woerd Wouterse and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 30#Krekel van der Woerd Wouterse until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sandstein 16:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]