Talk:Kristina Shea: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
ce |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The original text said that Shea won the 2001 [[Philip Leverhulme Prize]] in Engineering. |
The original text said that Shea won the 2001 [[Philip Leverhulme Prize]] in Engineering. |
||
The source is a university homepage, and no not necessarily reliable. The claim is not immediately consistent with https://web.archive.org/web/20170227211324/https://www.leverhulme.ac.uk/sites/default/files/imported_pdfs/2001.pdf [[User:Isabella21312123|Isabella21312123]] ([[User talk:Isabella21312123|talk]]) 19:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC) |
The source is a university homepage, and no not necessarily reliable. The claim is not immediately consistent with https://web.archive.org/web/20170227211324/https://www.leverhulme.ac.uk/sites/default/files/imported_pdfs/2001.pdf [[User:Isabella21312123|Isabella21312123]] ([[User talk:Isabella21312123|talk]]) 19:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Our '''Leverhulme Prize''' article (where that source is used for 2001) is not consistent with that source. Compare the names of the categories in the Leverhulme Prize article with the categories found in that source. Something is inconsistent here, but my |
:Our '''Leverhulme Prize''' article (where that source is used for 2001) is not consistent with that source. Compare the names of the categories in the Leverhulme Prize article with the categories found in that source. (Also, sources from near 2001 report that there were typically ~25 prizes a year, and this source lists far more names than that.) Something is inconsistent here, but my strong impression is that it's the wrong source, and that it describes some grant program that is not the actual Leverhulme Prize. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 20:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:06, 4 February 2023
Leverhulme Prize
The original text said that Shea won the 2001 Philip Leverhulme Prize in Engineering. The source is a university homepage, and no not necessarily reliable. The claim is not immediately consistent with https://web.archive.org/web/20170227211324/https://www.leverhulme.ac.uk/sites/default/files/imported_pdfs/2001.pdf Isabella21312123 (talk) 19:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Our Leverhulme Prize article (where that source is used for 2001) is not consistent with that source. Compare the names of the categories in the Leverhulme Prize article with the categories found in that source. (Also, sources from near 2001 report that there were typically ~25 prizes a year, and this source lists far more names than that.) Something is inconsistent here, but my strong impression is that it's the wrong source, and that it describes some grant program that is not the actual Leverhulme Prize. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC)