Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacksonian Indian Policy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 04:50, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacksonian Indian Policy

In accordance with WP:NOT#OR. This article is in debate/discussion format, with the research declared as being original in the article lead. Sesameball^Talk 03:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as seemingly pure original research. Bfigura ^(talk) 04:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probable OR, but it wouldn't surprise me if some of that were lifted directly from the books mentioned. Subject could perhaps be made into an article, but is already covered at Andrew Jackson#"Indian Removal" and Trail of Tears. faithless (^speak) 05:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Barf! Someone's debate topic and their essay for the different viewpoints. That type of intelligence insulting crap was a feature of The People's Almanac too. Mandsford 23:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Series of questions and answers with no conclusions, which is not encyclopedic as any conclusions, even if drawn, would be OR. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 23:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :{{la|Jacksonian Indian Policy}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacksonian Indian Policy|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 October 30#{{anchorencode:Jacksonian Indian Policy}}|View log]])</noinclude>
-In accordance with [[WP:NOT#OR]]. This article is in debate/discussion format, with the research declared as being original in the article lead. [[User:Sesameball|<font style="font-weight:bold;color:#D4AF37;">Sesame</font><font style="font-weight:bold;color:#000000;">ball</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Sesameball|Talk]]</sup> 03:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
+In accordance with [[WP:NOT#OR]]. This article is in debate/discussion format, with the research declared as being original in the article lead. [[User:Sesameball|<span style="font-weight:bold;color:#D4AF37;">Sesame</span><span style="font-weight:bold;color:#000000;">ball</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Sesameball|Talk]]</sup> 03:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * '''Delete''' as seemingly pure [[WP:OR|original research]]. [[User:Bfigura|<span style="color:green;">'''B'''</span><span style="color:blue;">figura</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Bfigura|talk]])</sup> 04:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Probable OR, but it wouldn't surprise me if some of that were lifted directly from the books mentioned. Subject could perhaps be made into an article, but is already covered at [[Andrew Jackson#"Indian Removal"]] and [[Trail of Tears]]. [[User:Faithlessthewonderboy|<span style="color:blue">'''faithless'''</span>]] [[User talk:Faithlessthewonderboy|<small><span style="color:black">(<sup>'''speak'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 05:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Barf!  Someone's debate topic and their essay for the different viewpoints.  That type of intelligence insulting crap was a feature of ''The People's Almanac'' too.  [[User:Mandsford|Mandsford]] 23:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' Series of questions and answers with no conclusions, which is not encyclopedic as any conclusions, even if drawn, would be OR. --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<font color="7F007F">'''Rodhullandemu'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rodhullandemu|contribs]]) 23:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' Series of questions and answers with no conclusions, which is not encyclopedic as any conclusions, even if drawn, would be OR. --'''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="color:#7F007F;">'''Rodhullandemu'''</span>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rodhullandemu|contribs]]) 23:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)