Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranda Murphy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 23:48, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 00:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Miranda Murphy and Kayne Taylor

Both were musicians that were spawned off a television show, but checking their google hits, the majority of them date back to 2003-2004. Both hadnt really done anything notable since the Popstars Live tv show. But not have much knowledge on the two, I'm not sure whether those 2 pass the notability bar. NO VOTE -- Arnzy | Talk 01:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both under our music notability guidelines. Both have had a top 100 hit in a large or medium size country namely Australia. From memory, I created the first version of the Kayne Taylor article. Capitalistroadster 01:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 01:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Captialistroadster. --Ter e nc e Ong 05:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep well known. --Masssiveego 05:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per Capitalistroadster. Cnwb 09:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above Compu terjoe 10:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --Cymsdal e 15:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all Bucketsofg 15:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 19:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all above. --AaronS 20:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep on the grounds of unanimous consensus; even the nom didn't express an opinion to delete. -ikkyu2 (talk) 20:11, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no good reason not to. ProhibitOnions 20:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep you got that right --Khoikhoi 03:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems notable and look aboveNewyorktimescrossword 09:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, both are somewhat notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 23:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 * '''Keep''' per above [[User:Computerjoe|<span style="color:black">Compu</span>]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">terjoe</span>]] 10:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' per all. --<span style="background:gold;">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">S</span>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</span>[[User talk:Siva1979|<sup style="background:yellow;">Talk to me</sup>]] 14:49, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''' per above. --[[User:Cymsdale|Cymsdal]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]] 15:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' per above. --[[User:Cymsdale|Cymsdal]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">e</span>]] 15:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' per all [[User:Bucketsofg|Bucketsofg]] 15:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' per above --[[User:Dysepsion|<span style="color:#0000CC;">† Ðy§ep§ion †</span>]] <sup> [[User_talk:Dysepsion|<i style="color:#0000CC;">Speak your mind</i>]]</sup> 19:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)