Jump to content

Talk:Rumble seat: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Badger74 (talk | contribs)
Line 5: Line 5:


: AS far as I cen tell a dicky seat is for one extra person in a two seater while a rumble seat is for one or two (or more?) and may be in a four seater. // [[User:Liftarn|Liftarn]]
: AS far as I cen tell a dicky seat is for one extra person in a two seater while a rumble seat is for one or two (or more?) and may be in a four seater. // [[User:Liftarn|Liftarn]]

Liftarn: not so far as I know. British dicky seats are frequently for two people. I am not familiar with dicky or rumble seats in four seaters - the typical body design of these cars would not allow a dicky. The illustration of the rumble seat in a Ford A in the Rumble article is the classic British meaning of Dicky Seat, as found in many British two-seaters of the 1920s and a little later.[[User:Badger74|Badger74]] 17:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:22, 9 March 2007

Dicky seat and Rumble seat

Each of these articles states that these are not the same thing but does not explain the difference. I have always understood that Dicky (Dickey) was the British English and Rumble the US English phrase and so the two are actually synonymous.

Can anyone define the difference or should one of the pages be made a redirect? Malcolma 12:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AS far as I cen tell a dicky seat is for one extra person in a two seater while a rumble seat is for one or two (or more?) and may be in a four seater. // Liftarn

Liftarn: not so far as I know. British dicky seats are frequently for two people. I am not familiar with dicky or rumble seats in four seaters - the typical body design of these cars would not allow a dicky. The illustration of the rumble seat in a Ford A in the Rumble article is the classic British meaning of Dicky Seat, as found in many British two-seaters of the 1920s and a little later.Badger74 17:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]