Talk:Onimai/FAQ: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
known |
slight reword (since now one JP source is added) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|index=2 |
|index=2 |
||
|q=All the reviews cited in the reception section are trashing the anime and that's clearly expressing a bias! |
|q=All the reviews cited in the reception section are trashing the anime and that's clearly expressing a bias! |
||
|a=At the time of writing this, all known significant perspectives on ''Onimai'' from [[Open access citation advantage|online English-language]] reliable sources have been included. Reviews of the show from such sources have generally leaned negative, although individual writers within ANN have expressed differing opinions (some of them more or less positive than others). The goal of NPOV on Wikipedia is not to remove or erase any opinion that anyone has ever had about a topic, but to [[WP:ASSERT|detail those notable opinions neutrally]] without inserting editorial bias. |
|a=At the time of writing this, all known significant perspectives on ''Onimai'' from [[Open access citation advantage|online English-language]] reliable sources have been included. Reviews of the show from such sources have generally leaned negative, although individual writers within ANN have expressed differing opinions (some of them more or less positive than others). The goal of NPOV on Wikipedia is not to remove or erase any opinion that anyone has ever had about a topic, but to [[WP:ASSERT|detail those notable opinions neutrally]] without inserting editorial bias. Perspectives from reliable sources in other languages exist, and anyone with the appropriate language knowledge is [[WP:WORLDVIEW|encouraged to add them]]. |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Revision as of 20:10, 19 February 2023
 | Below are answers to frequently asked questions about the corresponding page Onimai. They address concerns, questions, and misconceptions which have repeatedly arisen on the talk page. Please update this material when needed. |
Q1: Why is Anime News Network cited in the article?
A1: Multiple discussions have deemed the site to be generally reliable with some caveats regarding their encyclopedia and "interest" pieces, which do not meet the same editorial standards (see WP:ANIME discussions 1 2 3 4 and RS/N discussions 1 2). As such they are listed under reliable sources at WP:ANIME/RS#Situational and used in many relevant articles. If you have any concerns about their reliability, this judgment can be challenged at the appropriate venues (i.e. WT:ANIME or WP:RS/N).
Q2: All the reviews cited in the reception section are trashing the anime and that's clearly expressing a bias!
A2: At the time of writing this, all known significant perspectives on Onimai from online English-language reliable sources have been included. Reviews of the show from such sources have generally leaned negative, although individual writers within ANN have expressed differing opinions (some of them more or less positive than others). The goal of NPOV on Wikipedia is not to remove or erase any opinion that anyone has ever had about a topic, but to detail those notable opinions neutrally without inserting editorial bias. Perspectives from reliable sources in other languages exist, and anyone with the appropriate language knowledge is encouraged to add them.