Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uppersia tour operator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per CSD R2: cross-namespace redirect from mainspace, after being userfied and nomination withdrawn. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Uppersia tour operator

Uppersia tour operator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Request Salt. Speedy deleted three times, keeps coming back complete with speedy tags and hangon already in place. Non-notable, spammy, no reliable sources. If no salt allowed, request AfD deletion instead of speedy this time so can do WP:G4 speedys in future. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 20:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Update: Page creator has partially userfied the page by copy–and–pasting a copy into his user space (q.v. discussion). If he/she completes the userfication by blanking, redirecting, and asking for a speedy of the existing mainspace page, I will withdraw this AfD/salt nomination. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Withdrawn — The article creator has shown good faith and come through and completed the userfication. I truly believe that this creator's struggle is with understanding, not tendentiousness. I would, therefore, request that this nomination be closed as withdrawn. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 13:49, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.