Jump to content

Talk:Ghost: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 124.148.245.234 (talk) to last version by Hob Gadling
Line 76: Line 76:
I feel strongly that the word "spooky" needs to be included in the definition of a ghost. [[User:Mattcomputer|Mattcomputer]] ([[User talk:Mattcomputer|talk]]) 20:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
I feel strongly that the word "spooky" needs to be included in the definition of a ghost. [[User:Mattcomputer|Mattcomputer]] ([[User talk:Mattcomputer|talk]]) 20:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Cannolis|Cannolis]] ([[User talk:Cannolis|talk]]) 20:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Cannolis|Cannolis]] ([[User talk:Cannolis|talk]]) 20:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

== Please correct statistic for "seeing" ghosts. ==

The article incorrectly asserts "According to a 2009 study by the Pew Research Center, 18% of Americans say they have ''seen'' a ghost".

The citation misinterprets the Pew study. The study actually says 18% of Americans say they have "seen '''''or been in the presence of''''' a ghost".

Instead of citing an article ''about'' the research, it would be better to cite the actual research - https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2009/12/multiplefaiths.pdf [[User:Danjdanj|Danjdanj]] ([[User talk:Danjdanj|talk]]) 03:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:40, 21 February 2023

Former featured article candidateGhost is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 11, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
November 5, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 10, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Template:Vital article

Ghosts in video games

Maybe add a section about ghosts being in video/horror games for the media sections, like mentioning Boos in Mario, or The different ghost types in Phasmophobia WhoTheFluer (talk) 16:25, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would support this as ghosts have seen a revival in videogaming as an arts medium, especially due to games such as the mentioned Phasmophobia which also sparked other projects in return. Argacyan (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fiction tag

Owen250708, you added a tag to this article today indicating that it "may fail to make a clear distinction between fact and fiction." Which specific part of this article do you think fails to make a clear distinction between fact and fiction? The article appears to make clear that what is being discussed is a concept that has no scientific evidence for its existence, but which has existed in a wide variety of cultures and belief systems throughout human history. It discusses the (lack of) scientific evidence for ghosts, ghosts in the mythology of various cultures, ghosts in the mythology of various religions, the changing aspects of ghostlore in various historical eras. I do not see anywhere in the article where it asserts ghosts are "real" or fails to make clear that stories and beliefs are being discussed, rather than hard facts. I'm going to remove the template. If there is a specific section of the article that you think fails to make a clear distinction between fact and fiction, please replace the template in that section, rather than for the whole article. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2023

I feel strongly that the word "spooky" needs to be included in the definition of a ghost. Mattcomputer (talk) 20:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 20:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct statistic for "seeing" ghosts.

The article incorrectly asserts "According to a 2009 study by the Pew Research Center, 18% of Americans say they have seen a ghost".

The citation misinterprets the Pew study. The study actually says 18% of Americans say they have "seen or been in the presence of a ghost".

Instead of citing an article about the research, it would be better to cite the actual research - https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2009/12/multiplefaiths.pdf Danjdanj (talk) 03:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]