Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleat: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jackliddle (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Jackliddle (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
*'''Comment'''. This could also become a disambiguation page by adding "cleat: a spike or wedge on the bottom of [[athletic shoe]]s designed to increase traction" to the nautical reference. --[[User:Allen3|Allen3]] 14:08, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. This could also become a disambiguation page by adding "cleat: a spike or wedge on the bottom of [[athletic shoe]]s designed to increase traction" to the nautical reference. --[[User:Allen3|Allen3]] 14:08, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', interesting article. [[User:Grue|Grue]] 18:18, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', interesting article. [[User:Grue|Grue]] 18:18, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', I think this really has a great deal of potential to be encyclopedic.
*'''Keep''', I think this really has a great deal of potential to be encyclopedic.[[User:Jackliddle|Jackliddle]] 20:04, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:04, 22 March 2005

This was tagged for speedy deletion because it has been moved to wiktionary. It should not be deleted because cleats are real things and this article coudl be expanded. Kappa 03:26, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Hard to see what useful things it could say. Transwiki to Wiktionary. Lacrimosus 03:38, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, since it's already been transwiki'd. From the looks of it, one sentance pretty much says all there is to be said on the topic. --InShaneee 04:04, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, already transwikied. In fact, it should be speedied.
  • Weird nomination, you don't normally nominate soething you want kept. This has been tranwikied, there is not that much else to say about cleats, delete--nixie 04:45, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Should I just take the speedy tag off then? Kappa 04:50, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • No. Listing it here was the right thing to do. -- Cyrius| 05:47, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
        • I thought that things were speedied after transwiki?--nixie 06:26, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
          • The transwikification process makes no distinction between speedy deletion and normal deletion. (There isn't such a distinction in other WikiMedia projects.) This is the source of the problem. The processes form a loop. The Wikipedia deletion process places transwikification as one possible end result of the normal deletion process. The transwikification process places a deletion request, per the source project's deletion mechanism, as the end result of transwikification. There are several ways to fix this, including making the end of the transwikification process be speedy deletion instead of normal deletion. However, thanks to the recent spate of exactly that being done, we've seen the problems that that incurs, with large numbers of articles having to be unspeedied. (It's also an abuse of the speedy deletion process. Being a dictionary definiton is not a criterion for speedy deletion. Abusing speedy deletion is not something to be encouraged.) Putting the (unencyclopaedic) articles through the normal deletion process a second time, but explicitly excluding "Transwiki" as a choice, is another option. But that's also problematic, as demonstrated by Lacrimosus above. ☺ Uncle G 11:09, 2005 Mar 22 (UTC)
  • There might be potential for expansion here. Weak keep. Uncle G 11:09, 2005 Mar 22 (UTC)
  • Agreed - weak keep. History of cleats - different types of cleats - the many uses of cleats... Grutness|hello? 12:02, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge/Redirect to ship construction, or something similar. Can be broken out if/when expansion is achieved. Radiant_* 12:26, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. This could also become a disambiguation page by adding "cleat: a spike or wedge on the bottom of athletic shoes designed to increase traction" to the nautical reference. --Allen3 14:08, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, interesting article. Grue 18:18, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, I think this really has a great deal of potential to be encyclopedic.Jackliddle 20:04, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)