Talk:Twitter: Difference between revisions
→Inclusion of a recent outage: new section |
|||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
Shouldn’t there be Controversy topic that explains Twitter’s left leaning bias under Jack Dorsey or maybe mentioned in the first few paragraphs? I’ve noticed Wiki has these sections on other pages. [[User:WhowinsIwins|WhowinsIwins]] ([[User talk:WhowinsIwins|talk]]) 05:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
Shouldn’t there be Controversy topic that explains Twitter’s left leaning bias under Jack Dorsey or maybe mentioned in the first few paragraphs? I’ve noticed Wiki has these sections on other pages. [[User:WhowinsIwins|WhowinsIwins]] ([[User talk:WhowinsIwins|talk]]) 05:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Actually, I would dispute that view. Multiple websites have actually reported that Twitter's algorithm tends to amplify right-wing voices: [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/twitter-admits-bias-in-algorithm-for-rightwing-politicians-and-news-outlets The Guardian: Twitter admits bias in algorithm for rightwing politicians and news outlets], [https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-59011271 BBC: Twitter's algorithm favours right-leaning politics, research finds], [https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2021/11/13/according-to-twitter-twitters-algorithm-favours-conservatives The Economist: According to Twitter, Twitter’s algorithm favours conservatives]. |
|||
:So, if you're going to make an argument about a social media platform having a political leaning, it would greatly help your case if you were actually truthful about which way the platform leans. But, I do agree with your basic idea that there should be a "Controversy" section about Twitter's political leaning; as people need to know that the way Twitter is coded actually tends to amplify right-wing voices. |
|||
:And, as far as your claim that this website has a "Controversy" section on other pages, care to elaborate on what articles about social media platforms on here have that section as it pertains to political leaning? [[Special:Contributions/2600:1700:C960:2270:5854:458C:454E:2788|2600:1700:C960:2270:5854:458C:454E:2788]] ([[User talk:2600:1700:C960:2270:5854:458C:454E:2788|talk]]) 10:42, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Inclusion of a recent outage == |
== Inclusion of a recent outage == |
Revision as of 10:42, 24 February 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Twitter article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
|
Twitter has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Other talk page banners | |||||||||
|
Dorsey's Resignation
Why is it that this article does not mention anything about Dorsey's resignation as CEO and from the board?--Cube b3 (talk) 03:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Home page image
Hello, the image used at the start of the article of twitter’s home page is inaccurate (as of the 22nd of December, 2022 in England).
The new homepage shows a ‘for you’ page. 209.93.228.189 (talk) 16:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Agree, I am in the UK and as of a few minutes ago this was my non logged in home page. Whether this is true in other countries is harder to say, but if this is commonplace the infobox image may need updating.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:05, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- This is in the news, but as we've already seen here, some people have had the "for you" tab for a while. As the Mashable article says, this is pretty much copying the idea of the "for you" link found on TikTok.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
New checkmark should be noted.
New checkmark seems to be yellow for news agencies. don't know when it was launched. please update, thanks. MarioFan324234 (talk) 16:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Controversy Topic
Shouldn’t there be Controversy topic that explains Twitter’s left leaning bias under Jack Dorsey or maybe mentioned in the first few paragraphs? I’ve noticed Wiki has these sections on other pages. WhowinsIwins (talk) 05:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, I would dispute that view. Multiple websites have actually reported that Twitter's algorithm tends to amplify right-wing voices: The Guardian: Twitter admits bias in algorithm for rightwing politicians and news outlets, BBC: Twitter's algorithm favours right-leaning politics, research finds, The Economist: According to Twitter, Twitter’s algorithm favours conservatives.
- So, if you're going to make an argument about a social media platform having a political leaning, it would greatly help your case if you were actually truthful about which way the platform leans. But, I do agree with your basic idea that there should be a "Controversy" section about Twitter's political leaning; as people need to know that the way Twitter is coded actually tends to amplify right-wing voices.
- And, as far as your claim that this website has a "Controversy" section on other pages, care to elaborate on what articles about social media platforms on here have that section as it pertains to political leaning? 2600:1700:C960:2270:5854:458C:454E:2788 (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Inclusion of a recent outage
This paragraph in the History section drew my attention: On February 8, 2023, Twitter users widely reported on various social media platforms that they were receiving error messages on Twitter such as "The content of your Tweet is invalid" or "You are over the daily limit for sending Tweets.” Twitter has not communicated the reasons why this outage occurred, but some believe the issue was caused by an engineer “unintentionally deleting data related to rate limiting”.
It doesn't seem notable enough to be included, as it's a short-lived technical issue that didn't cause any notable consequences. Devoting a paragraph to it feels a bit excessive, though I wouldn't go as far as shouting WP:Recentism. Still, its importance doesn't seem too great and I'd argue it could be removed or at least pared down substantially. Any opposition? ASpacemanFalls (talk) 14:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class Websites articles
- High-importance Websites articles
- GA-Class Websites articles of High-importance
- GA-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- GA-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- WikiProject Apps
- GA-Class apps articles
- High-importance apps articles
- WikiProject Apps articles
- GA-Class Freedom of speech articles
- Mid-importance Freedom of speech articles
- GA-Class Internet culture articles
- Top-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- GA-Class Brands articles
- Top-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- GA-Class California articles
- Mid-importance California articles
- GA-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- GA-Class Internet articles
- High-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report