Talk:Side Effects (Mariah Carey song)/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: GA |
m →GA Review: [t. 1] fix font tags linter errors |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Side Effects (song)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Side Effects (song)/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Side Effects (song)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Side Effects (song)/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
||
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Calvin999|< |
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Calvin999|<span style="color:blue;font-family:Aharoni;">'''''Calvin '''''</span>]]• [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><span style="color:orange;">Na</span><span style="color:green;">Na</span><span style="color:red;">Na</span><span style="color:purple;">C'mon!</span></sup>]] 10:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC) Will start in a few days. |
||
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
# [http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=Side_Effects_(song) No problematic links]. |
# [http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=Side_Effects_(song) No problematic links]. |
||
'''Great article, again, was a mistake not to release this as a single. On holddd.''' [[User:Calvin999|< |
'''Great article, again, was a mistake not to release this as a single. On holddd.''' [[User:Calvin999|<span style="color:blue;font-family:Aharoni;">'''''Calvin '''''</span>]]• [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><span style="color:orange;">Na</span><span style="color:green;">Na</span><span style="color:red;">Na</span><span style="color:purple;">C'mon!</span></sup>]] 16:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Passed! [[User:Calvin999|< |
: Passed! [[User:Calvin999|<span style="color:blue;font-family:Aharoni;">'''''Calvin '''''</span>]]• [[User talk:Calvin999|<sup><span style="color:orange;">Na</span><span style="color:green;">Na</span><span style="color:red;">Na</span><span style="color:purple;">C'mon!</span></sup>]] 12:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:12, 25 February 2023
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 10:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC) Will start in a few days.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Info box
- No issues.
- Lead info
- "Several reviews" → or reviewers might be better?
- Background
- "In an interview with Interview" → Maybe for clarity, it would be best to say "In an interview with Interview magazine".
- Composition
- No issues.
- Reception
- No issues.
- Live performances
- At the Jimmy Kimmel concert, she actually sang I'll Be Lovin' You Long Time as part of a mix with Touch My Body, like on the MTV Teen Choice Awards and MTV VMAs in Japan, not as separate songs/performances.
- "Do date, it is the only live performance of the song." → This isn't needed, it's kinda irrelevant.
- Credits and personnel
- No issues.
- Charts
- No issues.
- References
Great article, again, was a mistake not to release this as a single. On holddd. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 16:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- Passed! Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 12:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)