Talk:Rolex: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Rolex/Archive 2) (bot Tag: Reverted |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Rolex/Archive 2) (bot |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes}} |
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes}} |
||
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes | bot = MiszaBot | age = 1 | units = year |index=/Archive index}} |
{{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes | bot = MiszaBot | age = 1 | units = year |index=/Archive index}} |
||
== Notable inventions and patents == |
|||
The "notable inventions and patents" section is not neutral in the way it is currently written. The content of this section should describe the things that Rolex invented/patented rather than highlighting the things that Rolex did not invent. For instance, the section notes the offering of a self-winding wristwatch in 1931 but then goes on to say that Rolex was not the first to do so and refers to the self-winding watch by Harwood. Instead, the section should mention the 360 degrees self-winding rotor which Rolex released in 1931. This invention is notable because it became the standard winding mechanism for automatic watches. For contrasting this to the preceding invention, the article could mention that Harwood offered a self-winding mechanism with a weight that moved in a 270 degrees arc hitting buffer springs on both sides<ref>http://www.harwood-watches.com/en/history/index.html</ref>. |
|||
The same principle applies to most of the listed points. Instead of listing the actual inventions/patents and where necessary contrasting them to previous inventions, the article lists broader classes of inventions and then goes on to say that actually Rolex was not the first. |
|||
[[User:Asnelt|Asnelt]] ([[User talk:Asnelt|talk]]) 22:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Here is a reference for the 360 degrees self-winding rotor patent: <ref>https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=CH&NR=157995A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19321031#</ref>. [[User:Asnelt|Asnelt]] ([[User talk:Asnelt|talk]]) 23:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
For the 1926 list point, the emphasis should be on the screw-down crown. In 1926, Rolex invented the Oyster case, the first reliable waterproof wristwatch case that was based on a screw-down crown. To this end, Rolex acquired the Perragaux-Perret screw-down patent and combined it with a threaded case back and bezel<ref>https://mitka.co.uk/2021/08/08/its-whats-inside-that-counts-but-packaging-matters-a-survey-of-notable-wristwatch-case-designs-2/</ref>. [[User:Asnelt|Asnelt]] ([[User talk:Asnelt|talk]]) 21:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
As nobody was replying to the discussion here, I made changes to the section according to the comments above. But my changes were reverted claiming biased opinions. I was trying reduce bias in the writing, not increase it. This should be discussed here. [[User:Asnelt|Asnelt]] ([[User talk:Asnelt|talk]]) 21:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{reflist-talk}} |
Revision as of 02:48, 3 March 2023
There is a request, submitted by Lionsdude148, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rolex article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
Rolex received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Categories:
- Spoken Wikipedia requests
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class company articles
- High-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Switzerland articles
- Mid-importance Switzerland articles
- All WikiProject Switzerland pages
- B-Class Watches articles
- WikiProject Watches articles
- B-Class Brands articles
- High-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles