Jump to content

Butch and Sundance: The Early Days: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m rvt changes made w/o explanation or sources
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Bots
5,379,875 edits
Add: newspaper, website, title. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 1273/2713
Line 64: Line 64:
[[Roger Ebert]] gave the film 2.5 stars out of 4 and said it was "technically fine ... But as we listen to the freewheeling dialog, as we watch young Butch and the Kid blunder through their first adventures and finesse their later ones, there's a nagging question bouncing about in the backs of our heads: Why are we in this theater at this time? Did we want to know about the early days? Now that we're here, does the movie make us care? Not really."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/butch-and-sundance-the-early-days-1969 |title=Butch and Sundance: The Early Days |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=June 18, 1979 |website=[[RogerEbert.com]] |accessdate=April 22, 2019 }}</ref> [[Gene Siskel]] of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' also gave it 2.5 stars, writing that "Fox succeeded in getting the actors but failed to provide them with a really fine script. Which is not to say that 'Butch and Sundance: The Early Days' is a bad picture. On the contrary, it's pleasant enough, but that's about all."<ref>{{cite news|author=Gene Siskel|author-link=Gene Siskel|date=June 20, 1979|title=Butch, Sundance 'prequel' is too cute to cut it|work=[[Chicago Tribune]]|department=Section 3|page=7}}</ref> [[Vincent Canby]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' called the film "so lifeless it's almost creepy ... You can't believe that Mr. Lester was in the same continent when it was made." Of the two leads Canby said, "There's nothing remarkably wrong about their performances but, for one reason or another, there's absolutely no rapport between them."<ref>{{cite news|author=Canby, Vincent|date=June 15, 1979|title=Film: 'Butch and Sundance' Goes Off the Trail|work=[[The New York Times]]|page=C10}}</ref>
[[Roger Ebert]] gave the film 2.5 stars out of 4 and said it was "technically fine ... But as we listen to the freewheeling dialog, as we watch young Butch and the Kid blunder through their first adventures and finesse their later ones, there's a nagging question bouncing about in the backs of our heads: Why are we in this theater at this time? Did we want to know about the early days? Now that we're here, does the movie make us care? Not really."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/butch-and-sundance-the-early-days-1969 |title=Butch and Sundance: The Early Days |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=June 18, 1979 |website=[[RogerEbert.com]] |accessdate=April 22, 2019 }}</ref> [[Gene Siskel]] of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' also gave it 2.5 stars, writing that "Fox succeeded in getting the actors but failed to provide them with a really fine script. Which is not to say that 'Butch and Sundance: The Early Days' is a bad picture. On the contrary, it's pleasant enough, but that's about all."<ref>{{cite news|author=Gene Siskel|author-link=Gene Siskel|date=June 20, 1979|title=Butch, Sundance 'prequel' is too cute to cut it|work=[[Chicago Tribune]]|department=Section 3|page=7}}</ref> [[Vincent Canby]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' called the film "so lifeless it's almost creepy ... You can't believe that Mr. Lester was in the same continent when it was made." Of the two leads Canby said, "There's nothing remarkably wrong about their performances but, for one reason or another, there's absolutely no rapport between them."<ref>{{cite news|author=Canby, Vincent|date=June 15, 1979|title=Film: 'Butch and Sundance' Goes Off the Trail|work=[[The New York Times]]|page=C10}}</ref>


''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' wrote, "Tom Berenger and William Katt acquit themselves admirably, but simply can't compete with the ghosts of two superstars ... There are some patented Lester hijinks in the first half-hour of the prequel, but these peter out surprisingly soon. What's left is a mishmash of effective stuntwork and visuals, and a story line that moseys along with little suspense or excitement."<ref>"Film Reviews: Butch and Sundance". ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]''. June 6, 1979. 20.</ref> [[Kevin Thomas (film critic)|Kevin Thomas]] of the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' called the film "pleasant though slight."<ref>{{cite news|author=Kevin Thomas|author-link=Kevin Thomas (film critic)|date=1979-06-15 |title=A Prequel to Butch, Sundance |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |department=Part IV |page=1}}</ref> Gary Arnold of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' declared it "the first attractive Western to mosey across the screen in several years. Not a great or even rousing Western, but at least a pleasant, warmly evocative one, beautifully visualized and incidentally enjoyable for its settings, texture, droll tone and sometimes amusing interplay of characters."<ref>{{cite news |author=Gary Arnold |date=1979-06-15 |title=Two for the Comeback Trail |work=[[The Washington Post]] |page=B1}}</ref>
''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' wrote, "Tom Berenger and William Katt acquit themselves admirably, but simply can't compete with the ghosts of two superstars ... There are some patented Lester hijinks in the first half-hour of the prequel, but these peter out surprisingly soon. What's left is a mishmash of effective stuntwork and visuals, and a story line that moseys along with little suspense or excitement."<ref>"Film Reviews: Butch and Sundance". ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]''. June 6, 1979. 20.</ref> [[Kevin Thomas (film critic)|Kevin Thomas]] of the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' called the film "pleasant though slight."<ref>{{cite news|author=Kevin Thomas|author-link=Kevin Thomas (film critic)|date=1979-06-15 |title=A Prequel to Butch, Sundance |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |department=Part IV |page=1}}</ref> Gary Arnold of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' declared it "the first attractive Western to mosey across the screen in several years. Not a great or even rousing Western, but at least a pleasant, warmly evocative one, beautifully visualized and incidentally enjoyable for its settings, texture, droll tone and sometimes amusing interplay of characters."<ref>{{cite news |author=Gary Arnold |date=1979-06-15 |title=Two for the Comeback Trail |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |page=B1}}</ref>


The film reportedly lost $4 million. "It was a terrible movie", said a retired Fox executive. "It was a parody of a satire and it was filmed by talentless people. Naturally it bombed.... It takes a lot of money to produce a western. It has to be shot on location. You need horses, a period town, costumes and other paraphernalia that a contemporary film such as '[[Kramer vs. Kramer]]' doesn't require. That's why studios are reluctant to finance them."<ref>{{cite news |title=WHY THEY'RE SLOW ON THE DRAW |author=Michael Blowen |work=The Boston Globe |date=1980-06-29 |page=1}}</ref>
The film reportedly lost $4 million. "It was a terrible movie", said a retired Fox executive. "It was a parody of a satire and it was filmed by talentless people. Naturally it bombed.... It takes a lot of money to produce a western. It has to be shot on location. You need horses, a period town, costumes and other paraphernalia that a contemporary film such as '[[Kramer vs. Kramer]]' doesn't require. That's why studios are reluctant to finance them."<ref>{{cite news |title=WHY THEY'RE SLOW ON THE DRAW |author=Michael Blowen |work=The Boston Globe |date=1980-06-29 |page=1}}</ref>


''Butch and Sundance: The Early Years'' holds a 33% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on six reviews.<ref>https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/butch_and_sundance_the_early_days</ref>
''Butch and Sundance: The Early Years'' holds a 33% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on six reviews.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/butch_and_sundance_the_early_days | title=Butch and Sundance: The Early Days | website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] }}</ref>


==Release==
==Release==

Revision as of 23:56, 4 March 2023

Butch and Sundance: The Early Days
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRichard Lester
Written byAllan Burns
Produced bySteven Bach
Jack B. Bernstein
William Goldman
Gabriel Katzka
StarringWilliam Katt
Tom Berenger
CinematographyLászló Kovács
Edited byGeorge Trirogoff
Music byPatrick Williams
Production
companies
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Release date
June 15, 1979
Running time
111 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$9 million[1]
Box office$5,136,913[2]

Butch and Sundance: The Early Days is a 1979 American Western film and prequel to the 1969 film. It stars Tom Berenger as Butch Cassidy and William Katt as the Sundance Kid, with Jeff Corey reprising his role as Sheriff Bledsoe.

It was directed by Richard Lester and written by Allan Burns. It generally received mixed reviews but was nominated for an Oscar for Best Costume Design.[3]

Plot

In Wyoming, wannabe outlaw Butch Cassidy joins forces with sharpshooter Harry Longabaugh (who renames himself the Sundance Kid) and they carry out a series of robberies. However, Butch is stalked by a member of his former gang, O.C. Hanks, who believes he betrayed the gang. The two spend the winter in Telluride until they hear O.C. is in town, then rush away to deliver diphtheria serum to snowbound farms and become heroes. O.C. ambushes them and wounds Sundance by mistake. He recovers in Butch's home, tended by Butch's wife Mary and their two sons, who don't know their father's real job (he takes up butchery to earn money). O.C. turns up for a showdown and Sundance unintentionally kills him. Returning to crime, the pair rob a bank and then decide to rob a money train guarded by cavalry, not knowing Butch has been promised an amnesty if he gives up crime. They get the money, free the cavalry horses to prevent pursuit, and ride away dreaming of being famous outlaws.

Cast

Production

Allan Burns worked on the script with William Goldman, who was on board as executive producer; Goldman added some scenes and moments he wanted to introduce in the first movie but the bulk of the script was Burns'.[4][5]

William Katt had recently made First Love and was being called "a young Robert Redford"[by whom?] so ended up being cast as Sundance. Tom Berenger was cast after the studio were impressed by his performance in Looking for Mr. Goodbar.[6]

Jeff Corey, portraying Sheriff Bledsoe, was the only actor to reprise his role from the original 1969 film.

Director Richard Lester stated he had never seen the first movie.[4]

Reception

Critical response

Roger Ebert gave the film 2.5 stars out of 4 and said it was "technically fine ... But as we listen to the freewheeling dialog, as we watch young Butch and the Kid blunder through their first adventures and finesse their later ones, there's a nagging question bouncing about in the backs of our heads: Why are we in this theater at this time? Did we want to know about the early days? Now that we're here, does the movie make us care? Not really."[7] Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune also gave it 2.5 stars, writing that "Fox succeeded in getting the actors but failed to provide them with a really fine script. Which is not to say that 'Butch and Sundance: The Early Days' is a bad picture. On the contrary, it's pleasant enough, but that's about all."[8] Vincent Canby of The New York Times called the film "so lifeless it's almost creepy ... You can't believe that Mr. Lester was in the same continent when it was made." Of the two leads Canby said, "There's nothing remarkably wrong about their performances but, for one reason or another, there's absolutely no rapport between them."[9]

Variety wrote, "Tom Berenger and William Katt acquit themselves admirably, but simply can't compete with the ghosts of two superstars ... There are some patented Lester hijinks in the first half-hour of the prequel, but these peter out surprisingly soon. What's left is a mishmash of effective stuntwork and visuals, and a story line that moseys along with little suspense or excitement."[10] Kevin Thomas of the Los Angeles Times called the film "pleasant though slight."[11] Gary Arnold of The Washington Post declared it "the first attractive Western to mosey across the screen in several years. Not a great or even rousing Western, but at least a pleasant, warmly evocative one, beautifully visualized and incidentally enjoyable for its settings, texture, droll tone and sometimes amusing interplay of characters."[12]

The film reportedly lost $4 million. "It was a terrible movie", said a retired Fox executive. "It was a parody of a satire and it was filmed by talentless people. Naturally it bombed.... It takes a lot of money to produce a western. It has to be shot on location. You need horses, a period town, costumes and other paraphernalia that a contemporary film such as 'Kramer vs. Kramer' doesn't require. That's why studios are reluctant to finance them."[13]

Butch and Sundance: The Early Years holds a 33% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on six reviews.[14]

Release

A DVD of the film was released by Anchor Bay Entertainment in February 2005. However, Anchor Bay has since lost distribution rights to the film and the DVD was forced to go out of print.[citation needed]

Shout! Factory acquired the rights to the film and released it on DVD as a double billing with Death Hunt on February 1, 2011.[citation needed]

It is currently available on Blu-ray through Timeless Media Group.[citation needed]

References

  1. ^ Solomon, Aubrey (1989). Twentieth Century Fox: A Corporate and Financial History. Scarecrow Press. p. 259.
  2. ^ "Butch and Sundance: The Early Days". Box Office Mojo.
  3. ^ "Academy Awards". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved September 9, 2010.
  4. ^ a b Grant Lee (April 23, 1978). "'Sundance': Meanwhile, Back at the Ranch". Los Angeles Times. p. M40.
  5. ^ Bill Davidson (May 29, 1977). "The 'Hyphenate' Is Television's Latest Breed of Mogul: The 'Hyphenates'". The New York Times. p. 47.
  6. ^ Gregg Kilday (November 16, 1977). "FILM CLIPS: DYAN CANNON'S SHOOTING STAR". Los Angeles Times. p. G19.
  7. ^ Ebert, Roger (June 18, 1979). "Butch and Sundance: The Early Days". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  8. ^ Gene Siskel (June 20, 1979). "Butch, Sundance 'prequel' is too cute to cut it". Section 3. Chicago Tribune. p. 7.
  9. ^ Canby, Vincent (June 15, 1979). "Film: 'Butch and Sundance' Goes Off the Trail". The New York Times. p. C10.
  10. ^ "Film Reviews: Butch and Sundance". Variety. June 6, 1979. 20.
  11. ^ Kevin Thomas (June 15, 1979). "A Prequel to Butch, Sundance". Part IV. Los Angeles Times. p. 1.
  12. ^ Gary Arnold (June 15, 1979). "Two for the Comeback Trail". The Washington Post. p. B1.
  13. ^ Michael Blowen (June 29, 1980). "WHY THEY'RE SLOW ON THE DRAW". The Boston Globe. p. 1.
  14. ^ "Butch and Sundance: The Early Days". Rotten Tomatoes.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Butch_and_Sundance:_The_Early_Days&oldid=1142908101"