Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martina Chukwuma-Ezike: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:53, 12 March 2023

Martina Chukwuma-Ezike

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP written by SPA author who has not responded to a COI request. The coverage in independent sources is largely about her appointment as rector, therefore I think that WP:BIO1E applies. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The nominator's attempts at WP:OUTING by demanding personal information of editors is both inappropriate and irrelevant. Aberdeen has an unusual governance structure, but it appears that their head academic officer is their pro-chancellor; the rector is an elected representative of the students. So this is not the kind of position that passes WP:PROF#C6, and aside from that Chukwuma-Ezike appears not to be an academic. To me this implies that the appropriate notability criterion is WP:GNG. We do have in-depth news coverage of her in her new position as rector [1] [2] [3] but we also have coverage of her asthma work [4] [5]. Although this additional non-rector coverage does not have as much depth about her, I think it's enough to save this from WP:BIO1E. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 BLP written by SPA author who has not responded to a COI request. The coverage in independent sources is largely about her appointment as rector, therefore I think that [[WP:BIO1E]] applies. [[User:MrsSnoozyTurtle|''MrsSnoozyTurtle'']] 23:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators|Academics and educators]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Nigeria|Nigeria]]. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood|talk]]) 23:35, 12 March 2023 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Keep'''. The nominator's attempts at [[WP:OUTING]] by demanding personal information of editors is both inappropriate and irrelevant. Aberdeen has an unusual governance structure, but it appears that their head academic officer is their pro-chancellor; the rector is an elected representative of the students. So this is not the kind of position that passes [[WP:PROF#C6]], and aside from that Chukwuma-Ezike appears not to be an academic. To me this implies that the appropriate notability criterion is [[WP:GNG]]. We do have in-depth news coverage of her in her new position as rector [https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeen-aberdeenshire/4097696/martina-chukwuma-ezike-installed-as-rector/] [https://www.holyrood.com/inside-politics/view,making-history-the-black-female-rectors-leading-scotlands-ancient-institutions-into-the-future] [https://news.stv.tv/north/asthma-charity-boss-martina-chukwuma-ezike-is-first-person-of-colour-elected-rector-of-aberdeen-university] but we also have coverage of her asthma work [https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/asthma-chief-demands-review-of-eco-inhalers-before-people-die-6v07qkzjn] [https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/asthma-boss-calls-urgent-meeting-28171368]. Although this additional non-rector coverage does not have as much depth about her, I think it's enough to save this from [[WP:BIO1E]]. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 23:53, 12 March 2023 (UTC)