Family economy: Difference between revisions
Flod logic (talk | contribs) Adding short description: "Economics concept" (Shortdesc helper) |
Anthroqueer (talk | contribs) m First two sentences of the second paragraph were attributed to Ross & Sawhill, while the latter three were incorrectly attributed to Parente et al. The entire second paragraph is a direct quote from Ross & Sawhill (1977). |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The term '''Family Economy''' can be used to describe the family as an economic unit. The early stages of development in many economies are characterized by family based production.<ref name=Parente>Parente, S.L., Rogerson, R. & Wright, R., (2000). Homework in Development Economics: Household Production and the Wealth of Nations. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 680-687.</ref> |
The term '''Family Economy''' can be used to describe the family as an economic unit. The early stages of development in many economies are characterized by family based production.<ref name=Parente>Parente, S.L., Rogerson, R. & Wright, R., (2000). Homework in Development Economics: Household Production and the Wealth of Nations. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 680-687.</ref> |
||
In the early, pre-industrial stage, technology was limited and unchanging. Most [[economic]] activity took place within the household, and production and distribution were organized by custom and tradition.<ref>Ross, H. L. , Sawhill, I.V.(1977).The Family as an Economic Unit. |
"In the early, pre-industrial stage, technology was limited and unchanging. Most [[economic]] activity took place within the household, and production and distribution were organized by custom and tradition. High mortality rates and low productivity meant that on the farms and in the towns life was short and living conditions were harsh – an existence which was accepted fatalistically. In this society the family played a central role, since economic and social status was defined by birth, family ties, and local custom. Most importantly, the family was a productive unit, and physical strength – typically a male attribute – was an essential element in survival."<ref>Ross, H. L. , Sawhill, I.V.(1977).The Family as an Economic Unit. |
||
The Wilson Quarterly,1,2.Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40255183</ref> |
|||
The Wilson Quarterly,1,2.Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40255183</ref> High mortality rates and low productivity meant that on the farms and in the towns life was short and living conditions were harsh – an existence which was accepted fatalistically. In this society the family played a central role, since economic and social status was defined by birth, family ties, and local custom. Most importantly, the family was a productive unit, and physical strength – typically a male attribute – was an essential element in survival.<ref name="Parente"/> |
|||
The [[family]] economic unit has always been dependent on specialized labor done by family members. The family was a multi-generational producer with capital and land provided by older generations and labor provided by younger generations. Goods were produced not only for home [[Consumption (economics)|consumption]] but to sell and trade in the market as well. Family production was not only limited to agricultural products but they also produced manufacturing goods and provided services.<ref>Sellers, C.(1991). The Market Revolution: Jacksonian America, 1815-1846 Oxford University Press, New York.</ref> |
The [[family]] economic unit has always been dependent on specialized labor done by family members. The family was a multi-generational producer with capital and land provided by older generations and labor provided by younger generations. Goods were produced not only for home [[Consumption (economics)|consumption]] but to sell and trade in the market as well. Family production was not only limited to agricultural products but they also produced manufacturing goods and provided services.<ref>Sellers, C.(1991). The Market Revolution: Jacksonian America, 1815-1846 Oxford University Press, New York.</ref> |
||
Revision as of 17:07, 13 March 2023
The term Family Economy can be used to describe the family as an economic unit. The early stages of development in many economies are characterized by family based production.[1]
"In the early, pre-industrial stage, technology was limited and unchanging. Most economic activity took place within the household, and production and distribution were organized by custom and tradition. High mortality rates and low productivity meant that on the farms and in the towns life was short and living conditions were harsh – an existence which was accepted fatalistically. In this society the family played a central role, since economic and social status was defined by birth, family ties, and local custom. Most importantly, the family was a productive unit, and physical strength – typically a male attribute – was an essential element in survival."[2]
The family economic unit has always been dependent on specialized labor done by family members. The family was a multi-generational producer with capital and land provided by older generations and labor provided by younger generations. Goods were produced not only for home consumption but to sell and trade in the market as well. Family production was not only limited to agricultural products but they also produced manufacturing goods and provided services.[3]
In order to sustain a viable family economy during the pre-industrial era labor was needed. The labor needed to operate the farm and provide old-age support came from family members, fertility was high. High fertility and guaranteed employment on the family farm made education, beyond the basic literacy needed to read the Bible, expensive and unnecessary.[4]
Around the time of the post industrial stage, the European family changed from a unit of production to a unit of consumption. The new era of industrialization that Europe now found itself in brought numerous change to Europe. Now farming could be done with less individuals, removing the need for children as economic assets and instead created a view in which they were seen as liabilities. In addition to this, new ideas and inventions that allowed for the Industrialization to take place further contributed to the demise of the family economy. The new social norms saw a capitalist market that encouraged production in large scale factories, farms and mines. Wage labor would become a staple of European society and saw family members no longer working together but instead using their wages they had earned to buy goods which they consumed as a family unit.[5] The industrial revolution, starting in the nineteenth and going into the twentieth century, is seen as the force that changed the economic family and is basically responsible for the "modern family."
Further reading
Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Paarlberg, Don. "The Future of the Family Farm." The Saturday Evening Post. March 1976, pp. 42–43.
References
- ^ Parente, S.L., Rogerson, R. & Wright, R., (2000). Homework in Development Economics: Household Production and the Wealth of Nations. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 680-687.
- ^ Ross, H. L. , Sawhill, I.V.(1977).The Family as an Economic Unit. The Wilson Quarterly,1,2.Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40255183
- ^ Sellers, C.(1991). The Market Revolution: Jacksonian America, 1815-1846 Oxford University Press, New York.
- ^ Carter, S.B., Ransom, R.L., & Sutch, R.(2003). Family Matters: The Life-Cycle Transition and the Unparalleled Fertility Decline in Antebellum America. In Craig, L.(Ed.), To Sow One Acre More(pp. 107-113)Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
- ^ Ruggles, S. (2001). Living Arrangements and the Well-being of Older Persons in the Past, Population Bulletin of the United Nations, 42/43, 111-161