Talk:Presheaf with transfers: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Fourier-Deligne Transgirl|Fourier-Deligne Transgirl]] ([[User talk:Fourier-Deligne Transgirl|talk]]) 18:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC) |
--[[User:Fourier-Deligne Transgirl|Fourier-Deligne Transgirl]] ([[User talk:Fourier-Deligne Transgirl|talk]]) 18:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
P.S. For the motivation of presheaf with transfers, I think (from reading MO) it's to accommodate (fully faithfully embed) the test space category with finite correspondences, which in turn is about ensuring say that Gysin maps in realization come from |
P.S. For the motivation of presheaf with transfers, I think (from reading MO) it's to accommodate (fully faithfully embed) the test space category with finite correspondences, which in turn is about ensuring say that Gysin maps in realization come from morphisms in the motive category; though I'm not sure. |
Revision as of 19:16, 15 March 2023
Mathematics C‑class | ||||||||||
|
To-do list for Presheaf with transfers:
|
Typo
In the first paragraph of Presheaf with transfers § Finite correspondence, the projection that's supposed to be finite and surjective is not but , as the finite correspondences are supposed to be thought as finitely multi-valued functions, not functions with finite fibers, cf. Lecture 1 of Mazza-Voevodsky-Weibel.
--Fourier-Deligne Transgirl (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
P.S. For the motivation of presheaf with transfers, I think (from reading MO) it's to accommodate (fully faithfully embed) the test space category with finite correspondences, which in turn is about ensuring say that Gysin maps in realization come from morphisms in the motive category; though I'm not sure.