Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 33: Line 33:
It is true that I had to do many reverts because the article is constantly attacked by vandals. See the The talk page, where i have discussed reasons for every reverts([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:National_Development_Front#Marad_riots], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:National_Development_Front#Congress_campaigns_against_terrorism]). Some editors have tried to change the entire structure and content of the article([http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=110658555&oldid=110537150], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111078763&oldid=111047079]) in one stretch , for which I followed a step by step approach to keep the article in the same framework which was created by admins here and also push the POVs under critisism section so that there wont be constant fights regarding those issues. I don't think there was a need for me to breach 3RR. It doesn't make any sense that i have sock puppet just to prevent 3rr warnings. There are lot of people and lot of sock puppets trying to destroy the article of which few are already blocked.
It is true that I had to do many reverts because the article is constantly attacked by vandals. See the The talk page, where i have discussed reasons for every reverts([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:National_Development_Front#Marad_riots], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:National_Development_Front#Congress_campaigns_against_terrorism]). Some editors have tried to change the entire structure and content of the article([http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=110658555&oldid=110537150], [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111078763&oldid=111047079]) in one stretch , for which I followed a step by step approach to keep the article in the same framework which was created by admins here and also push the POVs under critisism section so that there wont be constant fights regarding those issues. I don't think there was a need for me to breach 3RR. It doesn't make any sense that i have sock puppet just to prevent 3rr warnings. There are lot of people and lot of sock puppets trying to destroy the article of which few are already blocked.


Regarding the first set, I see user [[User:NotBound]] involved in it. it looks like he was active just for that day in wikipedia. Maybe [[User:NotBound]] and [[User:wrongnot]](was listed as my sock puppet) are one. [[User:wrongnot]] was blocked and this might be his new ID. I have already said that i am working on a large LAN when I got the sock puppet warning from [[User:Thatcher131]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fear_the_Fire])
Regarding the first set, I see user [[User:NotBound]] involved in it. it looks like he was active just for that day in wikipedia. Maybe [[User:NotBound]] and [[User:Wrong_not]](was listed as my sock puppet) are one. [[User:Wrong_not]] was blocked and this might be his new ID. I have already said that i am working on a large LAN when I got the sock puppet warning from [[User:Thatcher131]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fear_the_Fire])
Regarding the second set, i am not involved and there is again a chance that [[User:Truehindu]] == [[User:NotBound]].
Regarding the second set, i am not involved and there is again a chance that [[User:Truehindu]] == [[User:NotBound]].
-- [[User:Fear the Fire|Fear the Fire]] 12:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
-- [[User:Fear the Fire|Fear the Fire]] 12:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:00, 12 March 2007

Sundaram7

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 08:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: D, E

The first 4 users voted the same way (keep) at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Popular_Front_of_India. Bharatson and Ramduke haven't made any edits outside of AfD. The others have also been involved in edit-warring at National Development Front. I had to fully protect the page today because of the constant edit-warring. See the history of the article to see the many instances where they have reverted to each others' version to evade 3RR. Aksi_great (talk) 08:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I was unaware of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn when I filed this case. It has already been proven that Bharatson is a sockpuppet of Sundaram7. But I would still like to know if Truehindu and NotBound are sockpuppets and if yes then who is still continuing sockpuppetry - Sundaram or Fear the Fire. - Aksi_great (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note:: Moved to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn. Real96 21:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed Per E (3RR violation using socks), please list four differences showing the 3RR violation. Real96 21:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from user: What User:Aksi_great argue is incorrect. There might be a lot of people in the same IP domain thinking in the same way and posting their comments. The administrator in previous case said Likely that Sundaram7 = Bharatson, but it was just based on his assumption and not confired and proved. Please see [1] where Thatcher131 is not sure that the others are my sock puppet but he has blocked me already. Thre is a 3RR related to the article National Development Front which is explained in a different stream[2] and [3]. The 3RR is not from me but related these cases. Fortunately the users were already being blocked based on other requests. Sundaram7 05:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Here are 2 sets of reverts made by the users. If they all are the same person, it would have breached 3RR.
3 reverts
Another set of 3 reverts
Both of the users Sundaram7 and Fear the Fire have been involved in previous sockpuppetry cases. Hence I suspect that either one, or both of them are still using socks to revert war. - Aksi_great (talk) 11:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that I had to do many reverts because the article is constantly attacked by vandals. See the The talk page, where i have discussed reasons for every reverts([10], [11]). Some editors have tried to change the entire structure and content of the article([12], [13]) in one stretch , for which I followed a step by step approach to keep the article in the same framework which was created by admins here and also push the POVs under critisism section so that there wont be constant fights regarding those issues. I don't think there was a need for me to breach 3RR. It doesn't make any sense that i have sock puppet just to prevent 3rr warnings. There are lot of people and lot of sock puppets trying to destroy the article of which few are already blocked.

Regarding the first set, I see user User:NotBound involved in it. it looks like he was active just for that day in wikipedia. Maybe User:NotBound and User:Wrong_not(was listed as my sock puppet) are one. User:Wrong_not was blocked and this might be his new ID. I have already said that i am working on a large LAN when I got the sock puppet warning from User:Thatcher131 ([14]) Regarding the second set, i am not involved and there is again a chance that User:Truehindu == User:NotBound. -- Fear the Fire 12:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Pens withdrawn

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 12:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Added by Bakasuprman (talk)
  • Code letter: B, C,E

BhaiSaab (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and TerryJ-Ho (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are banned for one year per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar, and have already been caught using sockpuppets at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MinaretDk. Pens withdrawn and Wrong_not are two new accounts that have been edit warring with an anonymous IP editor from the University of Texas at Austin (obviously Hkelkar) at National Development Front (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Thatcher131 12:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a better chance pens is related to the users I listed. They have engaged in votestacking here.Bakaman 01:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: Sockpuppets blocked, main accounts warned. Thanks Dmcdevit! Thatcher131 02:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Pens_withdrawn&oldid=114531197"