Template:Did you know nominations/Palmwood shipwreck

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 02:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Palmwood shipwreck

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

The silk dress from the Palmwood wreck

image with background removed

• ... that two dresses (one pictured) recovered from a 17th-century shipwreck may be the only such items in existence? Source: https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/17/world/dutch-palmwood-shipwreck-finds-scn/index.html “There may only be two such dresses in the whole world. And they are both here, on Texel.”
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kae Miller
  • Comment: I feel very strongly that this hook needs its image, and this image besides being important to the hook and incredibly unusual and rare also helps address systemic bias, as it's both outside of the English-speaking world and is a subject that is typically associated with women. There's an alternate image with white background if we think that would be clearer at size, happy to swap it out at the article as I've been waffling.

Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 17:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Palmwood shipwreck; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - question
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image eligibility:

• Freely licensed:
• Used in article: - n
• Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Valereee: Good article. Though, should the youtube video from Museum Kaap Skil be used as a source? also the alt picture you suggested isn't used in the article which it needs to be. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Hey, Onegreatjoke, thanks for the review! I wouldn't normally use most youtube videos as a source, but this one is professionally produced by a museum; usually I would consider that a reliable source. I'm happy to change the images out if someone prefers one over the other! I just didn't think the article needed both. Valereee (talk) 20:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

You know what, changed my mind: I've included both images. No real reason not to. Valereee (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Approving under the assumption that the youtube source is ok. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)