SIC-POVM: Difference between revisions
→Definition: simplify obscure notation |
m →Relation to MUBs: space inserted |
||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
==Relation to MUBs == |
==Relation to MUBs == |
||
In a ''d''-dimensional Hilbert space, two ''distinct'' bases <math> \left\{|\psi_i\rangle \right\}, \left\{ |\phi_j \rangle \right\} </math>are said to be [[mutually unbiased bases|mutually unbiased]] if |
In a ''d''-dimensional Hilbert space, two ''distinct'' bases <math> \left\{|\psi_i\rangle \right\}, \left\{ |\phi_j \rangle \right\} </math> are said to be [[mutually unbiased bases|mutually unbiased]] if |
||
: <math>\displaystyle |\langle \psi_i | \phi_j \rangle|^2 = \frac{1}{d}, \quad \forall i,j </math> |
: <math>\displaystyle |\langle \psi_i | \phi_j \rangle|^2 = \frac{1}{d}, \quad \forall i,j </math> |
||
This seems similar in nature to the symmetric property of SIC-POVMs. [[William Wootters|Wootters]] points out that a complete set of <math>d+1</math> unbiased bases yields a geometric structure known as a [[finite projective plane]], while a SIC-POVM (in any dimension that is a [[prime power]]) yields a [[Affine plane (incidence geometry)|finite affine plane]], a type of structure whose definition is identical to that of a finite projective plane with the roles of points and lines exchanged. In this sense, the problems of SIC-POVMs and of mutually unbiased bases are dual to one another.<ref>{{cite arXiv |eprint=quant-ph/0406032|last1= Wootters|first1= William K.|title= Quantum measurements and finite geometry|year= 2004}}</ref> |
This seems similar in nature to the symmetric property of SIC-POVMs. [[William Wootters|Wootters]] points out that a complete set of <math>d+1</math> unbiased bases yields a geometric structure known as a [[finite projective plane]], while a SIC-POVM (in any dimension that is a [[prime power]]) yields a [[Affine plane (incidence geometry)|finite affine plane]], a type of structure whose definition is identical to that of a finite projective plane with the roles of points and lines exchanged. In this sense, the problems of SIC-POVMs and of mutually unbiased bases are dual to one another.<ref>{{cite arXiv |eprint=quant-ph/0406032|last1= Wootters|first1= William K.|title= Quantum measurements and finite geometry|year= 2004}}</ref> |
Revision as of 08:11, 20 March 2023
A symmetric, informationally complete, positive operator-valued measure (SIC-POVM) is a special case of a generalized measurement on a Hilbert space, used in the field of quantum mechanics. A measurement of the prescribed form satisfies certain defining qualities that makes it an interesting candidate for a "standard quantum measurement", utilized in the study of foundational quantum mechanics, most notably in QBism. Furthermore, it has been shown that applications exist in quantum state tomography[1] and quantum cryptography,[2] and a possible connection has been discovered with Hilbert's twelfth problem.[3]
Definition
Due to the use of SIC-POVMs primarily in quantum mechanics, Dirac notation will be used throughout this article to represent elements in a Hilbert space.
A POVM over a -dimensional Hilbert space is a set of positive-semidefinite operators that sum to the identity: If a POVM consists of at least operators which span the space of self-adjoint operators , it is said to be an informationally complete POVM (IC-POVM). IC-POVMs consisting of exactly elements are called minimal. A set of rank-1 projectors which have equal pairwise Hilbert–Schmidt inner products, defines a minimal IC-POVM with elements called a SIC-POVM.
Properties
Symmetry
The condition that the projectors defined above have equal pairwise inner products actually fixes the value of this constant. Recall that and set . Then implies that . Thus, This property is what makes SIC-POVMs symmetric; with respect to the Hilbert–Schmidt inner product, any pair of elements is equivalent to any other pair.
Superoperator
In using the SIC-POVM elements, an interesting superoperator can be constructed, the likes of which map . This operator is most useful in considering the relation of SIC-POVMs with spherical t-designs. Consider the map
This operator acts on a SIC-POVM element in a way very similar to identity, in that
But since elements of a SIC-POVM can completely and uniquely determine any quantum state, this linear operator can be applied to the decomposition of any state, resulting in the ability to write the following:
- where
From here, the left inverse can be calculated[4] to be , and so with the knowledge that
- ,
an expression for a state can be created in terms of a quasi-probability distribution, as follows:
where is the Dirac notation for the density operator viewed in the Hilbert space . This shows that the appropriate quasi-probability distribution (termed as such because it may yield negative results) representation of the state is given by
Finding SIC sets
Simplest example
For the equations that define the SIC-POVM can be solved by hand, yielding the vectors
which form the vertices of a regular tetrahedron in the Bloch sphere. The projectors that define the SIC-POVM are given by , and the elements of the SIC-POVM are thus .
For higher dimensions this is not feasible, necessitating the use of a more sophisticated approach.
Group covariance
General group covariance
A SIC-POVM is said to be group covariant if there exists a group with a -dimensional unitary representation such that
The search for SIC-POVMs can be greatly simplified by exploiting the property of group covariance. Indeed, the problem is reduced to finding a normalized fiducial vector such that
- .
The SIC-POVM is then the set generated by the group action of on .
The case of Zd × Zd
So far, most SIC-POVM's have been found by considering group covariance under .[5] To construct the unitary representation, we map to , the group of unitary operators on d-dimensions. Several operators must first be introduced. Let be a basis for , then the phase operator is
- where is a root of unity
and the shift operator as
Combining these two operators yields the Weyl operator which generates the Heisenberg-Weyl group. This is a unitary operator since
It can be checked that the mapping is a projective unitary representation. It also satisfies all of the properties for group covariance,[6] and is useful for numerical calculation of SIC sets.
Zauner's conjecture
Given some of the useful properties of SIC-POVMs, it would be useful if it was positively known whether such sets could be constructed in a Hilbert space of arbitrary dimension. Originally proposed in the dissertation of Zauner,[7] a conjecture about the existence of a fiducial vector for arbitrary dimensions was hypothesized.
More specifically,
For every dimension there exists a SIC-POVM whose elements are the orbit of a positive rank-one operator under the Weyl–Heisenberg group . What is more, commutes with an element T of the Jacobi group . The action of T on modulo the center has order three.
Utilizing the notion of group covariance on , this can be restated as [8]
For any dimension , let be an orthonormal basis for , and define
Then such that the set is a SIC-POVM.
Partial results
The proof for the existence of SIC-POVMs for arbitrary dimensions remains an open question,[6] but is an ongoing field of research in the quantum information community.
Exact expressions for SIC sets have been found for Hilbert spaces of all dimensions from through inclusive, and in some higher dimensions as large as , for 115 values of in all.[a] Furthermore, using the Heisenberg group covariance on , numerical solutions have been found for all integers up through , and in some larger dimensions up to .[b]
Relation to spherical t-designs
A spherical t-design is a set of vectors on the d-dimensional generalized hypersphere, such that the average value of any -order polynomial over is equal to the average of over all normalized vectors . Defining as the t-fold tensor product of the Hilbert spaces, and
as the t-fold tensor product frame operator, it can be shown that[8] a set of normalized vectors with forms a spherical t-design if and only if
It then immediately follows that every SIC-POVM is a 2-design, since
which is precisely the necessary value that satisfies the above theorem.
Relation to MUBs
In a d-dimensional Hilbert space, two distinct bases are said to be mutually unbiased if
This seems similar in nature to the symmetric property of SIC-POVMs. Wootters points out that a complete set of unbiased bases yields a geometric structure known as a finite projective plane, while a SIC-POVM (in any dimension that is a prime power) yields a finite affine plane, a type of structure whose definition is identical to that of a finite projective plane with the roles of points and lines exchanged. In this sense, the problems of SIC-POVMs and of mutually unbiased bases are dual to one another.[17]
In dimension , the analogy can be taken further: a complete set of mutually unbiased bases can be directly constructed from a SIC-POVM.[18] The 9 vectors of the SIC-POVM, together with the 12 vectors of the mutually unbiased bases, form a set that can be used in a Kochen–Specker proof.[19] However, in 6-dimensional Hilbert space, a SIC-POVM is known, but no complete set of mutually unbiased bases has yet been discovered, and it is widely believed that no such set exists.[20][21]
See also
Notes
References
- ^ Caves, Carlton M.; Fuchs, Christopher A.; Schack, Rüdiger (September 2002). "Unknown quantum states: The quantum de Finetti representation". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 43 (9): 4537–4559. arXiv:quant-ph/0104088. Bibcode:2002JMP....43.4537C. doi:10.1063/1.1494475. ISSN 0022-2488. S2CID 17416262.
- ^ Fuchs, C. A.; Sasaki, M. (2003). "Squeezing Quantum Information through a Classical Channel: Measuring the 'Quantumness' of a Set of Quantum States". Quant. Info. Comp. 3: 377–404. arXiv:quant-ph/0302092. Bibcode:2003quant.ph..2092F.
- ^ Appleby, Marcus; Flammia, Steven; McConnell, Gary; Yard, Jon (2017-04-24). "SICs and Algebraic Number Theory". Foundations of Physics. 47 (8): 1042–1059. arXiv:1701.05200. Bibcode:2017FoPh...47.1042A. doi:10.1007/s10701-017-0090-7. ISSN 0015-9018. S2CID 119334103.
- ^ C.M. Caves (1999); http://info.phys.unm.edu/~caves/reports/infopovm.pdf
- ^ a b Fuchs, Christopher A.; Hoang, Michael C.; Stacey, Blake C. (2017-03-22). "The SIC Question: History and State of Play". Axioms. 6 (4): 21. arXiv:1703.07901. doi:10.3390/axioms6030021.
- ^ a b Appleby, D. M. (2005). "SIC-POVMs and the Extended Clifford Group". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 46 (5): 052107. arXiv:quant-ph/0412001. Bibcode:2005JMP....46e2107A. doi:10.1063/1.1896384.
- ^ a b G. Zauner, Quantendesigns – Grundzüge einer nichtkommutativen Designtheorie. Dissertation, Universität Wien, 1999. http://www.gerhardzauner.at/documents/gz-quantendesigns.pdf
- ^ a b c d Renes, Joseph M.; Blume-Kohout, Robin; Scott, A. J.; Caves, Carlton M. (2004). "Symmetric Informationally Complete Quantum Measurements". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 45 (6): 2171. arXiv:quant-ph/0310075. Bibcode:2004JMP....45.2171R. doi:10.1063/1.1737053. S2CID 17371881.
- ^ A. Koldobsky and H. König, “Aspects of the Isometric Theory of Banach Spaces,” in Handbook of the Geometry of Banach Spaces, Vol. 1, edited by W. B. Johnson and J. Lindenstrauss, (North Holland, Dordrecht, 2001), pp. 899–939.
- ^ a b Scott, A. J.; Grassl, M. (2010). "SIC-POVMs: A new computer study". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 51 (4): 042203. arXiv:0910.5784. Bibcode:2010JMP....51d2203S. doi:10.1063/1.3374022. S2CID 115159554.
- ^ TY Chien. ``Equiangular lines, projective symmetries and nice error frames. PhD thesis University of Auckland (2015); https://www.math.auckland.ac.nz/~waldron/Tuan/Thesis.pdf
- ^ "Exact SIC fiducial vectors". University of Sydney. Retrieved 2018-03-07.
- ^ Appleby, Marcus; Chien, Tuan-Yow; Flammia, Steven; Waldron, Shayne (2018). "Constructing exact symmetric informationally complete measurements from numerical solutions". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 51 (16): 165302. arXiv:1703.05981. Bibcode:2018JPhA...51p5302A. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aab4cd. S2CID 119736328.
- ^ a b Stacey, Blake C. (2021). A First Course in the Sporadic SICs. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. p. 6. ISBN 978-3-030-76104-2. OCLC 1253477267.
- ^ Fuchs, Christopher A.; Stacey, Blake C. (2016-12-21). "QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero's Handbook". arXiv:1612.07308 [quant-ph].
- ^ Scott, A. J. (2017-03-11). "SICs: Extending the list of solutions". arXiv:1703.03993 [quant-ph].
- ^ Wootters, William K. (2004). "Quantum measurements and finite geometry". arXiv:quant-ph/0406032.
- ^ Stacey, Blake C. (2016). "SIC-POVMs and Compatibility among Quantum States". Mathematics. 4 (2): 36. arXiv:1404.3774. doi:10.3390/math4020036.
- ^ Bengtsson, Ingemar; Blanchfield, Kate; Cabello, Adán (2012). "A Kochen–Specker inequality from a SIC". Physics Letters A. 376 (4): 374–376. arXiv:1109.6514. Bibcode:2012PhLA..376..374B. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2011.12.011. S2CID 55755390.
- ^ Grassl, Markus (2004). "On SIC-POVMs and MUBs in Dimension 6". arXiv:quant-ph/0406175.
- ^ Bengtsson, Ingemar; Życzkowski, Karol (2017). Geometry of quantum states : an introduction to quantum entanglement (Second ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 313–354. ISBN 9781107026254. OCLC 967938939.