Jump to content

Talk:All About Love: New Visions: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
Line 8: Line 8:


There is an over-reliance on primary sources in this article [[User:Tenuous tree|Tenuous tree]] ([[User talk:Tenuous tree|talk]]) 14:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
There is an over-reliance on primary sources in this article [[User:Tenuous tree|Tenuous tree]] ([[User talk:Tenuous tree|talk]]) 14:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

== Grammar and structural problems ==

The format and content doesn't fit the usual Wikipedia structure for books. There are also multiple grammar errors such as sentences beginning without capitalization. Overall, it wasn't up to most Wikipedia article standards. [[User:TonyRoni|TonyRoni]] ([[User talk:TonyRoni|talk]]) 20:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:23, 22 March 2023

WikiProject iconBooks Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Literature Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophical literature

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More secondary sources needed

There is an over-reliance on primary sources in this article Tenuous tree (talk) 14:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar and structural problems

The format and content doesn't fit the usual Wikipedia structure for books. There are also multiple grammar errors such as sentences beginning without capitalization. Overall, it wasn't up to most Wikipedia article standards. TonyRoni (talk) 20:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]